Cargando…

Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists

PURPOSE: To characterise the physiological profiles of trained handcyclists, during recumbent handcycling, to describe the physiological responses during a 16 km time trial (TT) and to identify the determinants of this TT performance. METHODS: Eleven male handcyclists performed a sub-maximal and max...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stone, Benjamin, Mason, Barry S., Stephenson, Ben T., Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04390-w
_version_ 1783546695918813184
author Stone, Benjamin
Mason, Barry S.
Stephenson, Ben T.
Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
author_facet Stone, Benjamin
Mason, Barry S.
Stephenson, Ben T.
Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
author_sort Stone, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To characterise the physiological profiles of trained handcyclists, during recumbent handcycling, to describe the physiological responses during a 16 km time trial (TT) and to identify the determinants of this TT performance. METHODS: Eleven male handcyclists performed a sub-maximal and maximal incremental exercise test in their recumbent handbike, attached to a Cyclus II ergometer. A physiological profile, including peak aerobic power output (PO(Peak)), peak rate of oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2Peak)), aerobic lactate threshold (AeLT) and PO at 4 mmol L(−1) (PO(4)), were determined. Participants also completed a 16 km simulated TT using the same experimental set-up. Determinants of TT performance were identified using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean values of PO(Peak) = 252 ± 9 W, [Formula: see text] O(2Peak) = 3.30 ± 0.36 L min(−1) (47.0 ± 6.8 mL kg(−1) min(−1)), AeLT = 87 ± 13 W and PO(4) = 154 ± 14 W were recorded. The TT was completed in 29:21 ± 0:59 min:s at an intensity equivalent to 69 ± 4% PO(Peak) and 87 ± 5% [Formula: see text] O(2Peak). PO(Peak) (r = − 0.77, P = 0.006), PO(4) (r = − 0.77, P = 0.006) and AeLT (r = − 0.68, P = 0.022) were significantly correlated with TT performance. PO(4) and PO(Peak) were identified as the best predictors of TT performance (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PO(Peak), PO(4) and AeLT are important physiological TT performance determinants in trained handcyclists, differentiating between superior and inferior performance, whereas [Formula: see text] O(2peak) was not. The TT took place at an intensity corresponding to 69% PO(Peak) and 87% [Formula: see text] O(2peak).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72957122020-06-19 Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists Stone, Benjamin Mason, Barry S. Stephenson, Ben T. Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L. Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: To characterise the physiological profiles of trained handcyclists, during recumbent handcycling, to describe the physiological responses during a 16 km time trial (TT) and to identify the determinants of this TT performance. METHODS: Eleven male handcyclists performed a sub-maximal and maximal incremental exercise test in their recumbent handbike, attached to a Cyclus II ergometer. A physiological profile, including peak aerobic power output (PO(Peak)), peak rate of oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text] O(2Peak)), aerobic lactate threshold (AeLT) and PO at 4 mmol L(−1) (PO(4)), were determined. Participants also completed a 16 km simulated TT using the same experimental set-up. Determinants of TT performance were identified using stepwise multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean values of PO(Peak) = 252 ± 9 W, [Formula: see text] O(2Peak) = 3.30 ± 0.36 L min(−1) (47.0 ± 6.8 mL kg(−1) min(−1)), AeLT = 87 ± 13 W and PO(4) = 154 ± 14 W were recorded. The TT was completed in 29:21 ± 0:59 min:s at an intensity equivalent to 69 ± 4% PO(Peak) and 87 ± 5% [Formula: see text] O(2Peak). PO(Peak) (r = − 0.77, P = 0.006), PO(4) (r = − 0.77, P = 0.006) and AeLT (r = − 0.68, P = 0.022) were significantly correlated with TT performance. PO(4) and PO(Peak) were identified as the best predictors of TT performance (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PO(Peak), PO(4) and AeLT are important physiological TT performance determinants in trained handcyclists, differentiating between superior and inferior performance, whereas [Formula: see text] O(2peak) was not. The TT took place at an intensity corresponding to 69% PO(Peak) and 87% [Formula: see text] O(2peak). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7295712/ /pubmed/32435985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04390-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Stone, Benjamin
Mason, Barry S.
Stephenson, Ben T.
Goosey-Tolfrey, Vicky L.
Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title_full Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title_fullStr Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title_full_unstemmed Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title_short Physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
title_sort physiological responses during simulated 16 km recumbent handcycling time trial and determinants of performance in trained handcyclists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32435985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04390-w
work_keys_str_mv AT stonebenjamin physiologicalresponsesduringsimulated16kmrecumbenthandcyclingtimetrialanddeterminantsofperformanceintrainedhandcyclists
AT masonbarrys physiologicalresponsesduringsimulated16kmrecumbenthandcyclingtimetrialanddeterminantsofperformanceintrainedhandcyclists
AT stephensonbent physiologicalresponsesduringsimulated16kmrecumbenthandcyclingtimetrialanddeterminantsofperformanceintrainedhandcyclists
AT gooseytolfreyvickyl physiologicalresponsesduringsimulated16kmrecumbenthandcyclingtimetrialanddeterminantsofperformanceintrainedhandcyclists