Cargando…
Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure
A cautious gait (CG), marked by wider and shorter steps, is typically employed to mitigate expected perturbations proactively. However, it is not well understood if and how CG is informed by the task requirements. Therefore, we assessed how CG is adjusted to these requirements. Three groups of ten h...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66305-1 |
_version_ | 1783546709969731584 |
---|---|
author | Swart, Sander B. den Otter, Rob Lamoth, Claudine J. C. |
author_facet | Swart, Sander B. den Otter, Rob Lamoth, Claudine J. C. |
author_sort | Swart, Sander B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A cautious gait (CG), marked by wider and shorter steps, is typically employed to mitigate expected perturbations proactively. However, it is not well understood if and how CG is informed by the task requirements. Therefore, we assessed how CG is adjusted to these requirements. Three groups of ten healthy young adults were exposed to a single uninterrupted protocol of treadmill walking that consisted of three distinct phases. Spatiotemporal step characteristics and margins of stability of the unperturbed strides were compared when participants were (i) only warned of a perturbation, (ii) exposed to fifty unilateral (right) slip-like perturbations and (iii) kept unaware of perturbation removal. Only the perturbation intensity predictability differed between groups. This was either kept consistent or pseudo-randomly or randomly varied. Participants walked with wider and shorter steps following the perturbation warning. However, this extinguished in continuing perturbation absence. Next, during perturbation exposure, participants shortened the step of the perturbed but increased the step of the unperturbed leg. This did not differ between groups. Finally, participants persisted in displaying CG on perturbation removal, but this extinguished over time. Collectively, we show that CG is functionally adjusted to the task requirements. These findings may have practical implications for fall-prevention training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72957742020-06-17 Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure Swart, Sander B. den Otter, Rob Lamoth, Claudine J. C. Sci Rep Article A cautious gait (CG), marked by wider and shorter steps, is typically employed to mitigate expected perturbations proactively. However, it is not well understood if and how CG is informed by the task requirements. Therefore, we assessed how CG is adjusted to these requirements. Three groups of ten healthy young adults were exposed to a single uninterrupted protocol of treadmill walking that consisted of three distinct phases. Spatiotemporal step characteristics and margins of stability of the unperturbed strides were compared when participants were (i) only warned of a perturbation, (ii) exposed to fifty unilateral (right) slip-like perturbations and (iii) kept unaware of perturbation removal. Only the perturbation intensity predictability differed between groups. This was either kept consistent or pseudo-randomly or randomly varied. Participants walked with wider and shorter steps following the perturbation warning. However, this extinguished in continuing perturbation absence. Next, during perturbation exposure, participants shortened the step of the perturbed but increased the step of the unperturbed leg. This did not differ between groups. Finally, participants persisted in displaying CG on perturbation removal, but this extinguished over time. Collectively, we show that CG is functionally adjusted to the task requirements. These findings may have practical implications for fall-prevention training. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7295774/ /pubmed/32541837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66305-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Swart, Sander B. den Otter, Rob Lamoth, Claudine J. C. Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title | Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title_full | Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title_fullStr | Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title_full_unstemmed | Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title_short | Anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
title_sort | anticipatory control of human gait following simulated slip exposure |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32541837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66305-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swartsanderb anticipatorycontrolofhumangaitfollowingsimulatedslipexposure AT denotterrob anticipatorycontrolofhumangaitfollowingsimulatedslipexposure AT lamothclaudinejc anticipatorycontrolofhumangaitfollowingsimulatedslipexposure |