Cargando…

Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients

PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breheny, Katie, Hollingworth, William, Kandiyali, Rebecca, Dixon, Padraig, Loose, Abi, Craggs, Pippa, Grzeda, Mariusz, Sparrow, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3
_version_ 1783546723111534592
author Breheny, Katie
Hollingworth, William
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Dixon, Padraig
Loose, Abi
Craggs, Pippa
Grzeda, Mariusz
Sparrow, John
author_facet Breheny, Katie
Hollingworth, William
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Dixon, Padraig
Loose, Abi
Craggs, Pippa
Grzeda, Mariusz
Sparrow, John
author_sort Breheny, Katie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population. METHODS: The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4–8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman’s rs =  − 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs =  − 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs =  − 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34–0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20–0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13–0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17–0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72958302020-06-19 Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients Breheny, Katie Hollingworth, William Kandiyali, Rebecca Dixon, Padraig Loose, Abi Craggs, Pippa Grzeda, Mariusz Sparrow, John Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population. METHODS: The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4–8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman’s rs =  − 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs =  − 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs =  − 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34–0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20–0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13–0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17–0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7295830/ /pubmed/32080789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Breheny, Katie
Hollingworth, William
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Dixon, Padraig
Loose, Abi
Craggs, Pippa
Grzeda, Mariusz
Sparrow, John
Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title_full Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title_fullStr Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title_short Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
title_sort assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based measures (pbms) in cataract surgery patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brehenykatie assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT hollingworthwilliam assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT kandiyalirebecca assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT dixonpadraig assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT looseabi assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT craggspippa assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT grzedamariusz assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients
AT sparrowjohn assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients