Cargando…
Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3 |
_version_ | 1783546723111534592 |
---|---|
author | Breheny, Katie Hollingworth, William Kandiyali, Rebecca Dixon, Padraig Loose, Abi Craggs, Pippa Grzeda, Mariusz Sparrow, John |
author_facet | Breheny, Katie Hollingworth, William Kandiyali, Rebecca Dixon, Padraig Loose, Abi Craggs, Pippa Grzeda, Mariusz Sparrow, John |
author_sort | Breheny, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population. METHODS: The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4–8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman’s rs = − 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs = − 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs = − 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34–0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20–0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13–0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17–0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72958302020-06-19 Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients Breheny, Katie Hollingworth, William Kandiyali, Rebecca Dixon, Padraig Loose, Abi Craggs, Pippa Grzeda, Mariusz Sparrow, John Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in visual conditions has been questioned, inspiring development of a vision ‘bolt-on’ domain (EQ-5D-3L + VIS). Developments in preference-based measures (PBM) also includes the EQ-5D-5L and the ICECAP-O capability wellbeing measure. This study aimed to examine the construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L + VIS and ICECAP-O in cataract surgery patients for the first time, to inform choice of PBM for economic evaluation in this population. METHODS: The analyses used data from the UK Predict-CAT cataract surgery cohort study. PBMs and the Cat-PROM5 [a validated measure of cataract quality of life (QOL)] were completed before surgery and 4–8 weeks after. Construct validity was assessed using correlations and known-group differences evaluated using regression. Responsiveness was evaluated using effect sizes and analysis of variance to compare change scores between groups, defined by patient-reported and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The sample comprised 1315 patients at baseline. No PBMs were associated with visual acuity and only the ICECAP-O (Spearman’s rs = − 0.35), EQ-5D-3L + VIS (rs = − 0.42) and EQ-5D-5L (Value Set for England rs = − 0.31) correlated at least moderately with the Cat-PROM5. Effect sizes of change were consistently largest for the EQ-5D-3L + VIS (range 0.34–0.41), followed by the ICECAP-O (range 0.20–0.34). Results indicated no improvement in responsiveness using the EQ-5D-5L (range 0.13–0.16) compared to the EQ-5D-3L (range 0.17–0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst no PBMs comprehensively demonstrated evidence of construct validity and responsiveness in cataract surgery patients, the ICECAP-O was the most responsive generic PBM to improvements in QOL. Surprisingly the EQ-5D-5L was not more responsive than the EQ-5D-3L in this setting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7295830/ /pubmed/32080789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Breheny, Katie Hollingworth, William Kandiyali, Rebecca Dixon, Padraig Loose, Abi Craggs, Pippa Grzeda, Mariusz Sparrow, John Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title | Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title_full | Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title_fullStr | Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title_short | Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients |
title_sort | assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based measures (pbms) in cataract surgery patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32080789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02443-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brehenykatie assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT hollingworthwilliam assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT kandiyalirebecca assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT dixonpadraig assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT looseabi assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT craggspippa assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT grzedamariusz assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients AT sparrowjohn assessingtheconstructvalidityandresponsivenessofpreferencebasedmeasurespbmsincataractsurgerypatients |