Cargando…

Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis

BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yifan, Jiang, Yun, Dorsch, Michael P, Ding, Yuting, Vydiswaran, V G Vinod, Lester, Corey A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405
_version_ 1783546729226829824
author Zheng, Yifan
Jiang, Yun
Dorsch, Michael P
Ding, Yuting
Vydiswaran, V G Vinod
Lester, Corey A
author_facet Zheng, Yifan
Jiang, Yun
Dorsch, Michael P
Ding, Yuting
Vydiswaran, V G Vinod
Lester, Corey A
author_sort Zheng, Yifan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescribed. However, little is known about the quality of these transcribed directions received by patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of 529 990 e-prescription directions processed at a mail-order pharmacy in the USA. We measured pharmacy staff editing of directions using string edit distance and execution time using the Keystroke-Level Model. Using the New Dale-Chall (NDC) readability formula, we calculated NDC cloze scores of the patient directions before and after transcription. We also evaluated the quality of directions (eg, included a dose, dose unit, frequency of administration) before and after transcription with a random sample of 966 patient directions. RESULTS: Pharmacy staff edited 83.8% of all e-prescription directions received with a median edit distance of 18 per e-prescription. We estimated a median of 6.64 s of transcribing each e-prescription. The median NDC score increased by 68.6% after transcription (26.12 vs 44.03, p<0.001), which indicated a significant readability improvement. In our sample, 51.4% of patient directions on e-prescriptions contained at least one pre-defined direction quality issue. Pharmacy staff corrected 79.5% of the quality issues. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy staff put significant effort into transcribing e-prescription directions. Manual transcription removed the majority of quality issues; however, pharmacy staff still miss or introduce following their manual transcription processes. The development of tools and techniques such as a comprehensive set of structured direction components or machine learning–based natural language processing techniques may help produce clear directions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72958632020-06-16 Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Yun Dorsch, Michael P Ding, Yuting Vydiswaran, V G Vinod Lester, Corey A BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescribed. However, little is known about the quality of these transcribed directions received by patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of 529 990 e-prescription directions processed at a mail-order pharmacy in the USA. We measured pharmacy staff editing of directions using string edit distance and execution time using the Keystroke-Level Model. Using the New Dale-Chall (NDC) readability formula, we calculated NDC cloze scores of the patient directions before and after transcription. We also evaluated the quality of directions (eg, included a dose, dose unit, frequency of administration) before and after transcription with a random sample of 966 patient directions. RESULTS: Pharmacy staff edited 83.8% of all e-prescription directions received with a median edit distance of 18 per e-prescription. We estimated a median of 6.64 s of transcribing each e-prescription. The median NDC score increased by 68.6% after transcription (26.12 vs 44.03, p<0.001), which indicated a significant readability improvement. In our sample, 51.4% of patient directions on e-prescriptions contained at least one pre-defined direction quality issue. Pharmacy staff corrected 79.5% of the quality issues. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy staff put significant effort into transcribing e-prescription directions. Manual transcription removed the majority of quality issues; however, pharmacy staff still miss or introduce following their manual transcription processes. The development of tools and techniques such as a comprehensive set of structured direction components or machine learning–based natural language processing techniques may help produce clear directions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7295863/ /pubmed/32451350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Yifan
Jiang, Yun
Dorsch, Michael P
Ding, Yuting
Vydiswaran, V G Vinod
Lester, Corey A
Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title_full Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title_fullStr Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title_full_unstemmed Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title_short Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
title_sort work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyifan workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis
AT jiangyun workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis
AT dorschmichaelp workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis
AT dingyuting workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis
AT vydiswaranvgvinod workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis
AT lestercoreya workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis