Cargando…
Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis
BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405 |
_version_ | 1783546729226829824 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Yun Dorsch, Michael P Ding, Yuting Vydiswaran, V G Vinod Lester, Corey A |
author_facet | Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Yun Dorsch, Michael P Ding, Yuting Vydiswaran, V G Vinod Lester, Corey A |
author_sort | Zheng, Yifan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescribed. However, little is known about the quality of these transcribed directions received by patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of 529 990 e-prescription directions processed at a mail-order pharmacy in the USA. We measured pharmacy staff editing of directions using string edit distance and execution time using the Keystroke-Level Model. Using the New Dale-Chall (NDC) readability formula, we calculated NDC cloze scores of the patient directions before and after transcription. We also evaluated the quality of directions (eg, included a dose, dose unit, frequency of administration) before and after transcription with a random sample of 966 patient directions. RESULTS: Pharmacy staff edited 83.8% of all e-prescription directions received with a median edit distance of 18 per e-prescription. We estimated a median of 6.64 s of transcribing each e-prescription. The median NDC score increased by 68.6% after transcription (26.12 vs 44.03, p<0.001), which indicated a significant readability improvement. In our sample, 51.4% of patient directions on e-prescriptions contained at least one pre-defined direction quality issue. Pharmacy staff corrected 79.5% of the quality issues. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy staff put significant effort into transcribing e-prescription directions. Manual transcription removed the majority of quality issues; however, pharmacy staff still miss or introduce following their manual transcription processes. The development of tools and techniques such as a comprehensive set of structured direction components or machine learning–based natural language processing techniques may help produce clear directions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7295863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72958632020-06-16 Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Yun Dorsch, Michael P Ding, Yuting Vydiswaran, V G Vinod Lester, Corey A BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Free-text directions generated by prescribers in electronic prescriptions can be difficult for patients to understand due to their variability, complexity and ambiguity. Pharmacy staff are responsible for transcribing these directions so that patients can take their medication as prescribed. However, little is known about the quality of these transcribed directions received by patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of 529 990 e-prescription directions processed at a mail-order pharmacy in the USA. We measured pharmacy staff editing of directions using string edit distance and execution time using the Keystroke-Level Model. Using the New Dale-Chall (NDC) readability formula, we calculated NDC cloze scores of the patient directions before and after transcription. We also evaluated the quality of directions (eg, included a dose, dose unit, frequency of administration) before and after transcription with a random sample of 966 patient directions. RESULTS: Pharmacy staff edited 83.8% of all e-prescription directions received with a median edit distance of 18 per e-prescription. We estimated a median of 6.64 s of transcribing each e-prescription. The median NDC score increased by 68.6% after transcription (26.12 vs 44.03, p<0.001), which indicated a significant readability improvement. In our sample, 51.4% of patient directions on e-prescriptions contained at least one pre-defined direction quality issue. Pharmacy staff corrected 79.5% of the quality issues. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy staff put significant effort into transcribing e-prescription directions. Manual transcription removed the majority of quality issues; however, pharmacy staff still miss or introduce following their manual transcription processes. The development of tools and techniques such as a comprehensive set of structured direction components or machine learning–based natural language processing techniques may help produce clear directions. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7295863/ /pubmed/32451350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zheng, Yifan Jiang, Yun Dorsch, Michael P Ding, Yuting Vydiswaran, V G Vinod Lester, Corey A Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title | Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title_full | Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title_fullStr | Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title_short | Work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
title_sort | work effort, readability and quality of pharmacy transcription of patient directions from electronic prescriptions: a retrospective observational cohort analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhengyifan workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis AT jiangyun workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis AT dorschmichaelp workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis AT dingyuting workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis AT vydiswaranvgvinod workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis AT lestercoreya workeffortreadabilityandqualityofpharmacytranscriptionofpatientdirectionsfromelectronicprescriptionsaretrospectiveobservationalcohortanalysis |