Cargando…

Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) are alternatives to traditional combustion cigarettes (TCC) with an expanding consumer base. Yet, their cardiovascular health risks are still unclear. We aimed to summarize...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peruzzi, Mariangela, Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe, Carnevale, Roberto, Cavarretta, Elena, Frati, Giacomo, Versaci, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40138-020-00219-0
_version_ 1783546818448064512
author Peruzzi, Mariangela
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Roberto
Cavarretta, Elena
Frati, Giacomo
Versaci, Francesco
author_facet Peruzzi, Mariangela
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Roberto
Cavarretta, Elena
Frati, Giacomo
Versaci, Francesco
author_sort Peruzzi, Mariangela
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) are alternatives to traditional combustion cigarettes (TCC) with an expanding consumer base. Yet, their cardiovascular health risks are still unclear. We aimed to summarize the evidence base on this topic by conducting an updated umbrella review. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 7 systematic reviews, totaling 183 studies and reports, ranging from in vitro and in animal studies to clinical studies in apparently healthy volunteers and patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. Overall, acute EVC use was associated with several toxic effects at molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and system level. In addition, EVC impacted adversely on blood pressure (BP) management, caused tachycardia, and worsened arterial stiffness. Finally, EVC use was associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events, including atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction, even if the causal link is still debated. Most reviews highlighted that the detrimental impact of EVC was of lesser magnitude of that of TCC. In addition, the differential impact of liquids and nicotine was not clearly disentangled. Finally, no review included studies on HNBC. SUMMARY: The present umbrella review suggests that EVC, and likely HNBC, despite clearly causing an increase in overall cardiovascular risk, may represent a temporary lesser evil than TCC in a risk-reduction or risk-modification strategy, aiming for eventual abstinence from all tobacco or nicotine products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7296287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72962872020-06-16 Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review Peruzzi, Mariangela Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe Carnevale, Roberto Cavarretta, Elena Frati, Giacomo Versaci, Francesco Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep Cardiovascular Care (L Roever, Section Editor) PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Modified risk products (MRP) such as electronic vaping cigarettes (EVC) and heat-not-burn cigarettes (HNBC) are alternatives to traditional combustion cigarettes (TCC) with an expanding consumer base. Yet, their cardiovascular health risks are still unclear. We aimed to summarize the evidence base on this topic by conducting an updated umbrella review. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified 7 systematic reviews, totaling 183 studies and reports, ranging from in vitro and in animal studies to clinical studies in apparently healthy volunteers and patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. Overall, acute EVC use was associated with several toxic effects at molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and system level. In addition, EVC impacted adversely on blood pressure (BP) management, caused tachycardia, and worsened arterial stiffness. Finally, EVC use was associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical events, including atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction, even if the causal link is still debated. Most reviews highlighted that the detrimental impact of EVC was of lesser magnitude of that of TCC. In addition, the differential impact of liquids and nicotine was not clearly disentangled. Finally, no review included studies on HNBC. SUMMARY: The present umbrella review suggests that EVC, and likely HNBC, despite clearly causing an increase in overall cardiovascular risk, may represent a temporary lesser evil than TCC in a risk-reduction or risk-modification strategy, aiming for eventual abstinence from all tobacco or nicotine products. Springer US 2020-06-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7296287/ /pubmed/32837803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40138-020-00219-0 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Care (L Roever, Section Editor)
Peruzzi, Mariangela
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
Carnevale, Roberto
Cavarretta, Elena
Frati, Giacomo
Versaci, Francesco
Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title_full Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title_fullStr Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title_full_unstemmed Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title_short Vaping Cardiovascular Health Risks: an Updated Umbrella Review
title_sort vaping cardiovascular health risks: an updated umbrella review
topic Cardiovascular Care (L Roever, Section Editor)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40138-020-00219-0
work_keys_str_mv AT peruzzimariangela vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview
AT biondizoccaigiuseppe vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview
AT carnevaleroberto vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview
AT cavarrettaelena vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview
AT fratigiacomo vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview
AT versacifrancesco vapingcardiovascularhealthrisksanupdatedumbrellareview