Cargando…

The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study

Radiation oncology technology continues to evolve rapidly, resulting in advanced versions frequently being brought to market. Before a new product is used standard tests are carried out to reduce the risks associated with failure of the equipment to comply with well-established technical specificati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralston, Anna, Graham, Peter, Poder, Joel, Yuen, Johnson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.04.003
_version_ 1783546845566337024
author Ralston, Anna
Graham, Peter
Poder, Joel
Yuen, Johnson
author_facet Ralston, Anna
Graham, Peter
Poder, Joel
Yuen, Johnson
author_sort Ralston, Anna
collection PubMed
description Radiation oncology technology continues to evolve rapidly, resulting in advanced versions frequently being brought to market. Before a new product is used standard tests are carried out to reduce the risks associated with failure of the equipment to comply with well-established technical specifications. It is much harder to identify and reduce the risks associated with how the new technology is used clinically, such as those related to poor communication and high workload. To ensure that new technology and techniques are used safely and appropriately the implementation project should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) made up of representatives from all the relevant professions. The MDT’s role is to agree on the project scope, identify and rank all risks and benefits, and direct resources towards mitigating the highest risks. Before clinical release there should be consensus from the MDT that the benefits of the new technology outweigh the residual risks. The introduction of initiatives to optimise current practice may involve major changes which can be met with barriers such as limited support from management, insufficient time for MDT meetings, and staff fearful of being shown to have poor practices. To help overcome these challenges our team at St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre has developed a Risk and Benefit Balance Impact Template (RABBIT), which guides an MDT through the rapid implementation and safe use of new technology and techniques with an easy to follow Microsoft Word document. The implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery is used as a case study to illustrate the RABBIT methodology. The RABBIT is a user-friendly method for a busy radiotherapy clinic to transition to a risk-based MDT approach for the implementation of new technologies and techniques. When staff from all disciplines feel empowered to raise concerns about risks the workplace become inherently safer for patients and staff alike.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7296429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72964292020-06-18 The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study Ralston, Anna Graham, Peter Poder, Joel Yuen, Johnson Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Special Issue Paper Radiation oncology technology continues to evolve rapidly, resulting in advanced versions frequently being brought to market. Before a new product is used standard tests are carried out to reduce the risks associated with failure of the equipment to comply with well-established technical specifications. It is much harder to identify and reduce the risks associated with how the new technology is used clinically, such as those related to poor communication and high workload. To ensure that new technology and techniques are used safely and appropriately the implementation project should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) made up of representatives from all the relevant professions. The MDT’s role is to agree on the project scope, identify and rank all risks and benefits, and direct resources towards mitigating the highest risks. Before clinical release there should be consensus from the MDT that the benefits of the new technology outweigh the residual risks. The introduction of initiatives to optimise current practice may involve major changes which can be met with barriers such as limited support from management, insufficient time for MDT meetings, and staff fearful of being shown to have poor practices. To help overcome these challenges our team at St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre has developed a Risk and Benefit Balance Impact Template (RABBIT), which guides an MDT through the rapid implementation and safe use of new technology and techniques with an easy to follow Microsoft Word document. The implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery is used as a case study to illustrate the RABBIT methodology. The RABBIT is a user-friendly method for a busy radiotherapy clinic to transition to a risk-based MDT approach for the implementation of new technologies and techniques. When staff from all disciplines feel empowered to raise concerns about risks the workplace become inherently safer for patients and staff alike. Elsevier 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7296429/ /pubmed/32566770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.04.003 Text en Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Special Issue Paper
Ralston, Anna
Graham, Peter
Poder, Joel
Yuen, Johnson
The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title_full The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title_fullStr The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title_full_unstemmed The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title_short The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study
title_sort rabbit risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: srs as a case study
topic Special Issue Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.04.003
work_keys_str_mv AT ralstonanna therabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT grahampeter therabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT poderjoel therabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT yuenjohnson therabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT ralstonanna rabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT grahampeter rabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT poderjoel rabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy
AT yuenjohnson rabbitriskbasedapproachtoclinicalimplementationofnewtechnologysrsasacasestudy