Cargando…

Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data

BACKGROUND: In meta-analyses of a binary outcome, double zero events in some studies cause a critical methodology problem. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) has been proposed as a valid statistical tool for pooling such data. Three parameter estimation methods, including the Laplace approxim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ju, Ke, Lin, Lifeng, Chu, Haitao, Cheng, Liang-Liang, Xu, Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01035-6
_version_ 1783546892889620480
author Ju, Ke
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Cheng, Liang-Liang
Xu, Chang
author_facet Ju, Ke
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Cheng, Liang-Liang
Xu, Chang
author_sort Ju, Ke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In meta-analyses of a binary outcome, double zero events in some studies cause a critical methodology problem. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) has been proposed as a valid statistical tool for pooling such data. Three parameter estimation methods, including the Laplace approximation (LA), penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature (AGHQ) were frequently used in the GLMM. However, the performance of GLMM via these estimation methods is unclear in meta-analysis with zero events. METHODS: A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance. We fitted five random-effects GLMMs and estimated the results through the LA, PQL and AGHQ methods, respectively. Each scenario conducted 20,000 simulation iterations. The data from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were collected to form the simulation settings. The estimation methods were compared in terms of the convergence rate, bias, mean square error, and coverage probability. RESULTS: Our results suggested that when the total events were insufficient in either of the arms, the GLMMs did not show good point estimation to pool studies of rare events. The AGHQ method did not show better properties than the LA estimation in terms of convergence rate, bias, coverage, and possibility to produce very large odds ratios. In addition, although the PQL had some advantages, it was not the preferred option due to its low convergence rate in some situations, and the suboptimal point and variance estimation compared to the LA. CONCLUSION: The GLMM is an alternative for meta-analysis of rare events and is especially useful in the presence of zero-events studies, while at least 10 total events in both arms is recommended when employing GLMM for meta-analysis. The penalized quasi-likelihood and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature are not superior to the Laplace approximation for rare events and thus they are not recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7296731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72967312020-06-16 Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data Ju, Ke Lin, Lifeng Chu, Haitao Cheng, Liang-Liang Xu, Chang BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: In meta-analyses of a binary outcome, double zero events in some studies cause a critical methodology problem. The generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) has been proposed as a valid statistical tool for pooling such data. Three parameter estimation methods, including the Laplace approximation (LA), penalized quasi-likelihood (PQL) and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature (AGHQ) were frequently used in the GLMM. However, the performance of GLMM via these estimation methods is unclear in meta-analysis with zero events. METHODS: A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance. We fitted five random-effects GLMMs and estimated the results through the LA, PQL and AGHQ methods, respectively. Each scenario conducted 20,000 simulation iterations. The data from Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were collected to form the simulation settings. The estimation methods were compared in terms of the convergence rate, bias, mean square error, and coverage probability. RESULTS: Our results suggested that when the total events were insufficient in either of the arms, the GLMMs did not show good point estimation to pool studies of rare events. The AGHQ method did not show better properties than the LA estimation in terms of convergence rate, bias, coverage, and possibility to produce very large odds ratios. In addition, although the PQL had some advantages, it was not the preferred option due to its low convergence rate in some situations, and the suboptimal point and variance estimation compared to the LA. CONCLUSION: The GLMM is an alternative for meta-analysis of rare events and is especially useful in the presence of zero-events studies, while at least 10 total events in both arms is recommended when employing GLMM for meta-analysis. The penalized quasi-likelihood and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature are not superior to the Laplace approximation for rare events and thus they are not recommended. BioMed Central 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7296731/ /pubmed/32539721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01035-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ju, Ke
Lin, Lifeng
Chu, Haitao
Cheng, Liang-Liang
Xu, Chang
Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title_full Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title_fullStr Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title_full_unstemmed Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title_short Laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive Gauss–Hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
title_sort laplace approximation, penalized quasi-likelihood, and adaptive gauss–hermite quadrature for generalized linear mixed models: towards meta-analysis of binary outcome with sparse data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01035-6
work_keys_str_mv AT juke laplaceapproximationpenalizedquasilikelihoodandadaptivegausshermitequadratureforgeneralizedlinearmixedmodelstowardsmetaanalysisofbinaryoutcomewithsparsedata
AT linlifeng laplaceapproximationpenalizedquasilikelihoodandadaptivegausshermitequadratureforgeneralizedlinearmixedmodelstowardsmetaanalysisofbinaryoutcomewithsparsedata
AT chuhaitao laplaceapproximationpenalizedquasilikelihoodandadaptivegausshermitequadratureforgeneralizedlinearmixedmodelstowardsmetaanalysisofbinaryoutcomewithsparsedata
AT chengliangliang laplaceapproximationpenalizedquasilikelihoodandadaptivegausshermitequadratureforgeneralizedlinearmixedmodelstowardsmetaanalysisofbinaryoutcomewithsparsedata
AT xuchang laplaceapproximationpenalizedquasilikelihoodandadaptivegausshermitequadratureforgeneralizedlinearmixedmodelstowardsmetaanalysisofbinaryoutcomewithsparsedata