Cargando…

Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction

Objective The goal of this survey-based study is to explore patients’ knowledge of and expectations for radiologists in the outpatient setting.  Materials and Methods A comprehensive survey was distributed to adult patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a one-year period from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Andrew W, Landon, Rebecca A, Stacy, Gregory S, Dixon, Larry, Magee, Andrea L, Thomas, Stephen D, Dai, Xi, Straus, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550085
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8172
_version_ 1783546916715364352
author Phillips, Andrew W
Landon, Rebecca A
Stacy, Gregory S
Dixon, Larry
Magee, Andrea L
Thomas, Stephen D
Dai, Xi
Straus, Christopher
author_facet Phillips, Andrew W
Landon, Rebecca A
Stacy, Gregory S
Dixon, Larry
Magee, Andrea L
Thomas, Stephen D
Dai, Xi
Straus, Christopher
author_sort Phillips, Andrew W
collection PubMed
description Objective The goal of this survey-based study is to explore patients’ knowledge of and expectations for radiologists in the outpatient setting.  Materials and Methods A comprehensive survey was distributed to adult patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a one-year period from September 2015 through August 2016 at an urban, quaternary care academic medical center. Results The survey results demonstrate that only a subset of patients undergoing knee MRI at the institution during the survey period are aware of the role of the radiologist, which is a well-documented fact described in the literature. Approximately one-third of patients expected to meet the radiologist during their visit to the department of radiology to undergo a knee MRI. The vast majority of patients surveyed wanted to be able to contact the person who read their exam, but only one patient actually contacted the radiologist during the study period.  Conclusion While the vast majority of surveyed patients wanted to be able to contact the person who read their knee MRI, only one patient actually did reach out to the radiologist to discuss findings. However, six of 36 follow-up respondents reported that they had contacted the person “who interpreted/read your exam:” two in person, one by email, three by phone, and one by other. Survey results demonstrated that only a subset of patients correctly understood the role of the radiologist (46% in the 1(st )survey and 63% in the 2(nd )survey, which does not represent a statistically significant difference), which suggests that perhaps the patients did have a conversation with a member of the radiology department staff whom they believed was actually the radiologist. The fact that patients expressed a desire to communicate with the person reading their reports, but then did not take advantage of the opportunity to contact the radiologist, suggests that the issue is more complicated than just a lack of a pathway for communication between patients and radiologists. Perhaps the lack of a clear understanding of the role of the radiologist hinders patients from contacting radiologists, as they feel uncertain as to whom they are actually attempting to reach. Or perhaps patients are sufficiently reassured by having a means through which they could contact the radiologist and do not require the actual communication in order to feel comfortable. There remains a significant amount of work to be done in understanding the barriers in patient-radiologist communications. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7296885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72968852020-06-16 Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction Phillips, Andrew W Landon, Rebecca A Stacy, Gregory S Dixon, Larry Magee, Andrea L Thomas, Stephen D Dai, Xi Straus, Christopher Cureus Medical Education Objective The goal of this survey-based study is to explore patients’ knowledge of and expectations for radiologists in the outpatient setting.  Materials and Methods A comprehensive survey was distributed to adult patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a one-year period from September 2015 through August 2016 at an urban, quaternary care academic medical center. Results The survey results demonstrate that only a subset of patients undergoing knee MRI at the institution during the survey period are aware of the role of the radiologist, which is a well-documented fact described in the literature. Approximately one-third of patients expected to meet the radiologist during their visit to the department of radiology to undergo a knee MRI. The vast majority of patients surveyed wanted to be able to contact the person who read their exam, but only one patient actually contacted the radiologist during the study period.  Conclusion While the vast majority of surveyed patients wanted to be able to contact the person who read their knee MRI, only one patient actually did reach out to the radiologist to discuss findings. However, six of 36 follow-up respondents reported that they had contacted the person “who interpreted/read your exam:” two in person, one by email, three by phone, and one by other. Survey results demonstrated that only a subset of patients correctly understood the role of the radiologist (46% in the 1(st )survey and 63% in the 2(nd )survey, which does not represent a statistically significant difference), which suggests that perhaps the patients did have a conversation with a member of the radiology department staff whom they believed was actually the radiologist. The fact that patients expressed a desire to communicate with the person reading their reports, but then did not take advantage of the opportunity to contact the radiologist, suggests that the issue is more complicated than just a lack of a pathway for communication between patients and radiologists. Perhaps the lack of a clear understanding of the role of the radiologist hinders patients from contacting radiologists, as they feel uncertain as to whom they are actually attempting to reach. Or perhaps patients are sufficiently reassured by having a means through which they could contact the radiologist and do not require the actual communication in order to feel comfortable. There remains a significant amount of work to be done in understanding the barriers in patient-radiologist communications.  Cureus 2020-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7296885/ /pubmed/32550085 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8172 Text en Copyright © 2020, Phillips et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Phillips, Andrew W
Landon, Rebecca A
Stacy, Gregory S
Dixon, Larry
Magee, Andrea L
Thomas, Stephen D
Dai, Xi
Straus, Christopher
Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title_full Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title_fullStr Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title_short Optimizing the Radiology Experience through Radiologist–Patient Interaction
title_sort optimizing the radiology experience through radiologist–patient interaction
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32550085
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8172
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsandreww optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT landonrebeccaa optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT stacygregorys optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT dixonlarry optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT mageeandreal optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT thomasstephend optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT daixi optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction
AT strauschristopher optimizingtheradiologyexperiencethroughradiologistpatientinteraction