Cargando…
Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes
BACKGROUND: The presence of insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been called “double diabetes”. This entity increases the risk for development of micro and macrovascular complications and cardiovascular mortality. The gold standard for IR qua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00570-z |
_version_ | 1783546931780255744 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira-Hermosillo, Aldo Ibarra-Salce, Raúl Rodríguez-Malacara, Joshua Molina-Ayala, Mario Antonio |
author_facet | Ferreira-Hermosillo, Aldo Ibarra-Salce, Raúl Rodríguez-Malacara, Joshua Molina-Ayala, Mario Antonio |
author_sort | Ferreira-Hermosillo, Aldo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The presence of insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been called “double diabetes”. This entity increases the risk for development of micro and macrovascular complications and cardiovascular mortality. The gold standard for IR quantification is the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) but it is invasive, time-consuming and not available in the majority of the clinical settings. Because of this, some formulas for IR quantification have been proposed. We aimed to compare the utility of those methods for MS detection in patients with T1D. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 112 patients with T1D and determined the presence of MS using the Joint Statement Criteria. We calculated the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), estimated insulin sensitivity index (eIS), natural logarithm of glucose disposal rate (lnGDR), triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-c), visceral adipose index (VAI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and compared among patients with and without MS using Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver Operating Characteristics curves for the different indexes were used to identify the best cut-off points for MS detection. RESULTS: Thirty three percent of the patients were considered to have MS. The patients with MS had lower eGDR (5.49 [4.37–6.80] vs. 8.93 [8.03–9.94] mg/kg/min), eIS (2.89 [1.54–3.54] vs. 3.51 [2.68–4.68]) and lnGDR (1.69 ± 0.27 vs. 1.95 ± 0.21 mg/kg/min), and higher WHtR (0.55 ± 0.05 vs. 0.50 ± 0.05), VAI (3.4 [1.92–5.70] vs. 1.39 [0.97–1.92]) and TG/HDL-c (3.78 [2.63–5.73] vs. 1.77 [1.18–2.75]) in comparison with patients without MS. The cut-off points of TG-HDL-c > 2.0, eGDR < 7.32 mg/kg/min, lnGDR < 1.8 mg/kg/min, VAI > 1.84, WHtR > 0.52 and eIS < 2.92 had a sensitivity of 86, 85, 82, 77 and 70% respectively, for MS detection. The TG/HDL-c, lnGDR and eIS sensitivity changed depending on sex meanwhile eGDR, WHtR and VAI did not need adjust by sex. CONCLUSION: Our data show that an eGDR < 7.32 mg/kg/min have the highest sensitivity and specificity to detect the presence of MS in patients with T1D. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7296956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72969562020-06-16 Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes Ferreira-Hermosillo, Aldo Ibarra-Salce, Raúl Rodríguez-Malacara, Joshua Molina-Ayala, Mario Antonio BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The presence of insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic syndrome (MS) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been called “double diabetes”. This entity increases the risk for development of micro and macrovascular complications and cardiovascular mortality. The gold standard for IR quantification is the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) but it is invasive, time-consuming and not available in the majority of the clinical settings. Because of this, some formulas for IR quantification have been proposed. We aimed to compare the utility of those methods for MS detection in patients with T1D. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 112 patients with T1D and determined the presence of MS using the Joint Statement Criteria. We calculated the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), estimated insulin sensitivity index (eIS), natural logarithm of glucose disposal rate (lnGDR), triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (TG/HDL-c), visceral adipose index (VAI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), and compared among patients with and without MS using Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver Operating Characteristics curves for the different indexes were used to identify the best cut-off points for MS detection. RESULTS: Thirty three percent of the patients were considered to have MS. The patients with MS had lower eGDR (5.49 [4.37–6.80] vs. 8.93 [8.03–9.94] mg/kg/min), eIS (2.89 [1.54–3.54] vs. 3.51 [2.68–4.68]) and lnGDR (1.69 ± 0.27 vs. 1.95 ± 0.21 mg/kg/min), and higher WHtR (0.55 ± 0.05 vs. 0.50 ± 0.05), VAI (3.4 [1.92–5.70] vs. 1.39 [0.97–1.92]) and TG/HDL-c (3.78 [2.63–5.73] vs. 1.77 [1.18–2.75]) in comparison with patients without MS. The cut-off points of TG-HDL-c > 2.0, eGDR < 7.32 mg/kg/min, lnGDR < 1.8 mg/kg/min, VAI > 1.84, WHtR > 0.52 and eIS < 2.92 had a sensitivity of 86, 85, 82, 77 and 70% respectively, for MS detection. The TG/HDL-c, lnGDR and eIS sensitivity changed depending on sex meanwhile eGDR, WHtR and VAI did not need adjust by sex. CONCLUSION: Our data show that an eGDR < 7.32 mg/kg/min have the highest sensitivity and specificity to detect the presence of MS in patients with T1D. BioMed Central 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7296956/ /pubmed/32539854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00570-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferreira-Hermosillo, Aldo Ibarra-Salce, Raúl Rodríguez-Malacara, Joshua Molina-Ayala, Mario Antonio Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title | Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title_full | Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title_short | Comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with Double Diabetes |
title_sort | comparison of indirect markers of insulin resistance in adult patients with double diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00570-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreirahermosilloaldo comparisonofindirectmarkersofinsulinresistanceinadultpatientswithdoublediabetes AT ibarrasalceraul comparisonofindirectmarkersofinsulinresistanceinadultpatientswithdoublediabetes AT rodriguezmalacarajoshua comparisonofindirectmarkersofinsulinresistanceinadultpatientswithdoublediabetes AT molinaayalamarioantonio comparisonofindirectmarkersofinsulinresistanceinadultpatientswithdoublediabetes |