Cargando…

Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice

BACKGROUND: In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Litchfield, Ian, Spencer, Rachel, Bell, Brian G., Avery, Anthony, Perryman, Katherine, Marsden, Kate, Greenfield, Sheila, Campbell, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y
_version_ 1783546934556884992
author Litchfield, Ian
Spencer, Rachel
Bell, Brian G.
Avery, Anthony
Perryman, Katherine
Marsden, Kate
Greenfield, Sheila
Campbell, Stephen
author_facet Litchfield, Ian
Spencer, Rachel
Bell, Brian G.
Avery, Anthony
Perryman, Katherine
Marsden, Kate
Greenfield, Sheila
Campbell, Stephen
author_sort Litchfield, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of a prototype checklist designed to be used in busy general practice environments to provide an overview of key patient safety related processes and prompt practice wide-discussion. METHODS: An extensive narrative review and a survey of world-wide general practice organisations were used to identify existing primary care patient safety issues and tools. A RAND panel of international experts rated the results, summarising the findings for importance and relevance. The checklist was created to include areas that are not part of established patient safety tools or mandatory and legal requirements. Four main themes were identified: information flow, practice safety information, prescribing, and use of IT systems from which a 13 item checklist was trialled in 16 practices resulting in a nine item prototype checklist, which was tested in eight practices. Qualitative data on the utility and usability of the prototype was collected through a series of semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: In testing the prototype four of nine items on the checklist were achieved by all eight practices. Three items were achieved by seven of eight practices and two items by six of eight practices. Participants welcomed the brevity and ease of use of the prototype, that it might be used within time scales at their discretion and its ability to engage a range of practice staff in relevant discussions on the safety of existing processes. The items relating to prescribing safety were considered particularly useful. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this work the concise patient safety checklist tool, specifically designed for general practice, has now been made available as part of an online Patient Safety Toolkit hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Senior practice staff such as practice managers and GP partners should find it a useful tool to understand the safety of less explored yet important safety processes within the practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7296969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72969692020-06-16 Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice Litchfield, Ian Spencer, Rachel Bell, Brian G. Avery, Anthony Perryman, Katherine Marsden, Kate Greenfield, Sheila Campbell, Stephen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In the course of producing a patient safety toolkit for primary care, we identified the need for a concise safe-systems checklist designed to address areas of patient safety which are under-represented in mandatory requirements and existing tools. This paper describes the development of a prototype checklist designed to be used in busy general practice environments to provide an overview of key patient safety related processes and prompt practice wide-discussion. METHODS: An extensive narrative review and a survey of world-wide general practice organisations were used to identify existing primary care patient safety issues and tools. A RAND panel of international experts rated the results, summarising the findings for importance and relevance. The checklist was created to include areas that are not part of established patient safety tools or mandatory and legal requirements. Four main themes were identified: information flow, practice safety information, prescribing, and use of IT systems from which a 13 item checklist was trialled in 16 practices resulting in a nine item prototype checklist, which was tested in eight practices. Qualitative data on the utility and usability of the prototype was collected through a series of semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: In testing the prototype four of nine items on the checklist were achieved by all eight practices. Three items were achieved by seven of eight practices and two items by six of eight practices. Participants welcomed the brevity and ease of use of the prototype, that it might be used within time scales at their discretion and its ability to engage a range of practice staff in relevant discussions on the safety of existing processes. The items relating to prescribing safety were considered particularly useful. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this work the concise patient safety checklist tool, specifically designed for general practice, has now been made available as part of an online Patient Safety Toolkit hosted by the Royal College of General Practitioners. Senior practice staff such as practice managers and GP partners should find it a useful tool to understand the safety of less explored yet important safety processes within the practice. BioMed Central 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7296969/ /pubmed/32546167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Litchfield, Ian
Spencer, Rachel
Bell, Brian G.
Avery, Anthony
Perryman, Katherine
Marsden, Kate
Greenfield, Sheila
Campbell, Stephen
Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_full Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_fullStr Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_full_unstemmed Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_short Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
title_sort development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7296969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y
work_keys_str_mv AT litchfieldian developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT spencerrachel developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT bellbriang developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT averyanthony developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT perrymankatherine developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT marsdenkate developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT greenfieldsheila developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice
AT campbellstephen developmentoftheprototypeconcisesafesystemschecklisttoolforgeneralpractice