Cargando…

Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis

OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis often coexist. This confounds the assessment of outcomes of both sepsis and AKI in these patients. Hence, in this study, we compare the outcomes of AKI with sepsis, AKI without sepsis, and sepsis without AKI against a contr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nandagopal, Nithyashree, Reddy, Pavan K, Ranganathan, Lakshmi, Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan, Annigeri, Rajiv, Venkataraman, Ramesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565636
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23386
_version_ 1783546969164087296
author Nandagopal, Nithyashree
Reddy, Pavan K
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Annigeri, Rajiv
Venkataraman, Ramesh
author_facet Nandagopal, Nithyashree
Reddy, Pavan K
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Annigeri, Rajiv
Venkataraman, Ramesh
author_sort Nandagopal, Nithyashree
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis often coexist. This confounds the assessment of outcomes of both sepsis and AKI in these patients. Hence, in this study, we compare the outcomes of AKI with sepsis, AKI without sepsis, and sepsis without AKI against a control cohort comprising patients with neither AKI nor sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in our critical care unit (CCU) between January and July 2009. Data including demographic details, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score, presence of AKI, presence of sepsis, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and outcomes were collected for all patients. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria were used to define the presence of AKI and American College of Critical Care Medicine 2001 definition was used to define the presence of sepsis. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were included in the study and 8 patients were excluded from analysis as they were discharged from hospital against medical advice. The remaining 242 patients (mean age 52.8 ± 17 years; 61.6% male; APACHE III score: 48.2 ± 24.1) were analyzed, and AKI was seen in 111 patients (45.8%). Among the patients with AKI, 55.8% (62/111) had sepsis and 44.2% (49/111) had nonseptic AKI. There was a higher need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) among patients with septic AKI in comparison to those with nonseptic AKI (19.3% vs 6.1%; p = 0.04), but no mortality difference was seen between the two groups (25.8% vs 20.4%, p = 0.5). Patients with sepsis and AKI had a significantly higher mortality (25.8%) compared to the patients with sepsis alone (5.6%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with septic AKI had a higher RRT requirement compared to patients with nonseptic AKI, but no significant differences in mortality were seen between the groups. Occurrence of AKI in septic patients substantially increases their mortality. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Nandagopal N, Reddy PK, Ranganathan L, Ramakrishnan N, Annigeri R, Venkataraman R. Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(4):258–262.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7297243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72972432020-06-20 Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis Nandagopal, Nithyashree Reddy, Pavan K Ranganathan, Lakshmi Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Annigeri, Rajiv Venkataraman, Ramesh Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: In critically ill patients, acute kidney injury (AKI) and sepsis often coexist. This confounds the assessment of outcomes of both sepsis and AKI in these patients. Hence, in this study, we compare the outcomes of AKI with sepsis, AKI without sepsis, and sepsis without AKI against a control cohort comprising patients with neither AKI nor sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in our critical care unit (CCU) between January and July 2009. Data including demographic details, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III score, presence of AKI, presence of sepsis, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and outcomes were collected for all patients. Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria were used to define the presence of AKI and American College of Critical Care Medicine 2001 definition was used to define the presence of sepsis. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients were included in the study and 8 patients were excluded from analysis as they were discharged from hospital against medical advice. The remaining 242 patients (mean age 52.8 ± 17 years; 61.6% male; APACHE III score: 48.2 ± 24.1) were analyzed, and AKI was seen in 111 patients (45.8%). Among the patients with AKI, 55.8% (62/111) had sepsis and 44.2% (49/111) had nonseptic AKI. There was a higher need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) among patients with septic AKI in comparison to those with nonseptic AKI (19.3% vs 6.1%; p = 0.04), but no mortality difference was seen between the two groups (25.8% vs 20.4%, p = 0.5). Patients with sepsis and AKI had a significantly higher mortality (25.8%) compared to the patients with sepsis alone (5.6%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with septic AKI had a higher RRT requirement compared to patients with nonseptic AKI, but no significant differences in mortality were seen between the groups. Occurrence of AKI in septic patients substantially increases their mortality. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Nandagopal N, Reddy PK, Ranganathan L, Ramakrishnan N, Annigeri R, Venkataraman R. Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(4):258–262. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7297243/ /pubmed/32565636 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23386 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nandagopal, Nithyashree
Reddy, Pavan K
Ranganathan, Lakshmi
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Annigeri, Rajiv
Venkataraman, Ramesh
Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title_full Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title_fullStr Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title_short Comparison of Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with and without Sepsis
title_sort comparison of epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with and without sepsis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565636
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23386
work_keys_str_mv AT nandagopalnithyashree comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis
AT reddypavank comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis
AT ranganathanlakshmi comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis
AT ramakrishnannagarajan comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis
AT annigerirajiv comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis
AT venkataramanramesh comparisonofepidemiologyandoutcomesofacutekidneyinjuryincriticallyillpatientswithandwithoutsepsis