Cargando…

Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR

PCR inhibitors are a formidable problem to the study of aged, degraded, and/or low copy number DNA. As a result, there is a need to find alternate methods that ameliorate the efficacy of PCR. In this study, we attempted to use genetic methods to identify the species of salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kemp, Brian M., Bingham, Brittany, Frome, Ryan, Labonte, Marie, Palmer, Erica, Parsons, Ella S., Gobalet, Kenneth W., Rosenthal, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32544213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234745
_version_ 1783546975989268480
author Kemp, Brian M.
Bingham, Brittany
Frome, Ryan
Labonte, Marie
Palmer, Erica
Parsons, Ella S.
Gobalet, Kenneth W.
Rosenthal, Jeffrey
author_facet Kemp, Brian M.
Bingham, Brittany
Frome, Ryan
Labonte, Marie
Palmer, Erica
Parsons, Ella S.
Gobalet, Kenneth W.
Rosenthal, Jeffrey
author_sort Kemp, Brian M.
collection PubMed
description PCR inhibitors are a formidable problem to the study of aged, degraded, and/or low copy number DNA. As a result, there is a need to find alternate methods that ameliorate the efficacy of PCR. In this study, we attempted to use genetic methods to identify the species of salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) remains recovered from archaeological sites along the Feather River located in northern California, United States. In the process of doing so, we compared the efficacy of a PCR enhancer cocktail called “PEC-P” and a reagent rich PCR recipe called “rescue PCR” over standard PCR. Across all treatments (full concentration and 1:10 dilute eluates subjected to standard PCR, PEC-P, and rescue PCR) species identification was possible for 74 of 93 archaeological fish specimens (79.6%). Overall, six of the 93 samples (6.5%) consistently yielded species identification across all treatments. The species of ten specimens (10.8%) were uniquely identified from amplicons produced with either PEC-P or rescue PCR or both. Notably, the species of seven samples (7.5%) were uniquely identified with standard PCR over the alternative treatments. Considering both full concentration and 1:10 dilute eluates (N = 186), standard PCR performed as well as PEC-P (p = 0.1451) and rescue (p = 0.6753). Yet, considering results from full concentration eluates alone (N = 93), PEC-P (60.2%) outperformed both standard PCR (44.1%; p = 0.0277) and rescue PCR (40.9%; p = 0.0046). Stochasticity observed in our study cautions us against choosing a “best” performing method of those explored here and suggests their respective potentials to improve success may be sample dependent. When working with samples compromised by PCR inhibitors, it is useful to have alternative methodologies for subduing the problem. Both PEC-P and rescue PCR represent useful alternative methods for the study of aged, degraded, and/or low copy number DNA samples compromised by PCR inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7297307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72973072020-06-19 Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR Kemp, Brian M. Bingham, Brittany Frome, Ryan Labonte, Marie Palmer, Erica Parsons, Ella S. Gobalet, Kenneth W. Rosenthal, Jeffrey PLoS One Research Article PCR inhibitors are a formidable problem to the study of aged, degraded, and/or low copy number DNA. As a result, there is a need to find alternate methods that ameliorate the efficacy of PCR. In this study, we attempted to use genetic methods to identify the species of salmonid (Oncorhynchus spp.) remains recovered from archaeological sites along the Feather River located in northern California, United States. In the process of doing so, we compared the efficacy of a PCR enhancer cocktail called “PEC-P” and a reagent rich PCR recipe called “rescue PCR” over standard PCR. Across all treatments (full concentration and 1:10 dilute eluates subjected to standard PCR, PEC-P, and rescue PCR) species identification was possible for 74 of 93 archaeological fish specimens (79.6%). Overall, six of the 93 samples (6.5%) consistently yielded species identification across all treatments. The species of ten specimens (10.8%) were uniquely identified from amplicons produced with either PEC-P or rescue PCR or both. Notably, the species of seven samples (7.5%) were uniquely identified with standard PCR over the alternative treatments. Considering both full concentration and 1:10 dilute eluates (N = 186), standard PCR performed as well as PEC-P (p = 0.1451) and rescue (p = 0.6753). Yet, considering results from full concentration eluates alone (N = 93), PEC-P (60.2%) outperformed both standard PCR (44.1%; p = 0.0277) and rescue PCR (40.9%; p = 0.0046). Stochasticity observed in our study cautions us against choosing a “best” performing method of those explored here and suggests their respective potentials to improve success may be sample dependent. When working with samples compromised by PCR inhibitors, it is useful to have alternative methodologies for subduing the problem. Both PEC-P and rescue PCR represent useful alternative methods for the study of aged, degraded, and/or low copy number DNA samples compromised by PCR inhibitors. Public Library of Science 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7297307/ /pubmed/32544213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234745 Text en © 2020 Kemp et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kemp, Brian M.
Bingham, Brittany
Frome, Ryan
Labonte, Marie
Palmer, Erica
Parsons, Ella S.
Gobalet, Kenneth W.
Rosenthal, Jeffrey
Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title_full Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title_fullStr Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title_full_unstemmed Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title_short Subduing the influence of PCR inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number DNA: PCR enhancer cocktail-p and rescue PCR
title_sort subduing the influence of pcr inhibitors on amplifying aged, degraded, and low copy number dna: pcr enhancer cocktail-p and rescue pcr
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32544213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234745
work_keys_str_mv AT kempbrianm subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT binghambrittany subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT fromeryan subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT labontemarie subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT palmererica subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT parsonsellas subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT gobaletkennethw subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr
AT rosenthaljeffrey subduingtheinfluenceofpcrinhibitorsonamplifyingageddegradedandlowcopynumberdnapcrenhancercocktailpandrescuepcr