Cargando…
Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE
BACKGROUND: Pediatric ambulatory diagnostic errors (DEs) occur frequently. We used root cause analyses (RCAs) to identify their failure points and contributing factors. METHODS: Thirty-one practices were enrolled in a national QI collaborative to reduce 3 DEs occurring at different stages of the dia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299 |
_version_ | 1783546996819230720 |
---|---|
author | Dadlez, Nina M. Adelman, Jason Bundy, David G. Singh, Hardeep Applebaum, Jo R. Rinke, Michael L. |
author_facet | Dadlez, Nina M. Adelman, Jason Bundy, David G. Singh, Hardeep Applebaum, Jo R. Rinke, Michael L. |
author_sort | Dadlez, Nina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pediatric ambulatory diagnostic errors (DEs) occur frequently. We used root cause analyses (RCAs) to identify their failure points and contributing factors. METHODS: Thirty-one practices were enrolled in a national QI collaborative to reduce 3 DEs occurring at different stages of the diagnostic process: missed adolescent depression, missed elevated blood pressure (BP), and missed actionable laboratory values. Practices were encouraged to perform monthly “mini-RCAs” to identify failure points and prioritize interventions. Information related to process steps involved, specific contributing factors, and recommended interventions were reported monthly. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pareto charts. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (90%) practices submitted 184 mini-RCAs. The median number of mini-RCAs submitted was 6 (interquartile range, 2–9). For missed adolescent depression, the process step most commonly identified was the failure to screen (68%). For missed elevated BP, it was the failure to recognize (36%) and act on (28%) abnormal BP. For missed actionable laboratories, failure to notify families (23%) and document actions on (19%) abnormal results were the process steps most commonly identified. Top contributing factors to missed adolescent depression included patient volume (16%) and inadequate staffing (13%). Top contributing factors to missed elevated BP included patient volume (12%), clinic milieu (9%), and electronic health records (EHRs) (8%). Top contributing factors to missed actionable laboratories included written communication (13%), EHR (9%), and provider knowledge (8%). Recommended interventions were similar across errors. CONCLUSIONS: EHR-based interventions, standardization of processes, and cross-training may help decrease DEs in the pediatric ambulatory setting. Mini-RCAs are useful tools to identify their contributing factors and interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7297397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72973972020-07-09 Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE Dadlez, Nina M. Adelman, Jason Bundy, David G. Singh, Hardeep Applebaum, Jo R. Rinke, Michael L. Pediatr Qual Saf Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research BACKGROUND: Pediatric ambulatory diagnostic errors (DEs) occur frequently. We used root cause analyses (RCAs) to identify their failure points and contributing factors. METHODS: Thirty-one practices were enrolled in a national QI collaborative to reduce 3 DEs occurring at different stages of the diagnostic process: missed adolescent depression, missed elevated blood pressure (BP), and missed actionable laboratory values. Practices were encouraged to perform monthly “mini-RCAs” to identify failure points and prioritize interventions. Information related to process steps involved, specific contributing factors, and recommended interventions were reported monthly. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pareto charts. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (90%) practices submitted 184 mini-RCAs. The median number of mini-RCAs submitted was 6 (interquartile range, 2–9). For missed adolescent depression, the process step most commonly identified was the failure to screen (68%). For missed elevated BP, it was the failure to recognize (36%) and act on (28%) abnormal BP. For missed actionable laboratories, failure to notify families (23%) and document actions on (19%) abnormal results were the process steps most commonly identified. Top contributing factors to missed adolescent depression included patient volume (16%) and inadequate staffing (13%). Top contributing factors to missed elevated BP included patient volume (12%), clinic milieu (9%), and electronic health records (EHRs) (8%). Top contributing factors to missed actionable laboratories included written communication (13%), EHR (9%), and provider knowledge (8%). Recommended interventions were similar across errors. CONCLUSIONS: EHR-based interventions, standardization of processes, and cross-training may help decrease DEs in the pediatric ambulatory setting. Mini-RCAs are useful tools to identify their contributing factors and interventions. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7297397/ /pubmed/32656467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research Dadlez, Nina M. Adelman, Jason Bundy, David G. Singh, Hardeep Applebaum, Jo R. Rinke, Michael L. Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title | Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title_full | Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title_fullStr | Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title_full_unstemmed | Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title_short | Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE |
title_sort | contributing factors for pediatric ambulatory diagnostic process errors: project redde |
topic | Multi-Institutional Collaborative and QI Network Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32656467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dadlezninam contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde AT adelmanjason contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde AT bundydavidg contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde AT singhhardeep contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde AT applebaumjor contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde AT rinkemichaell contributingfactorsforpediatricambulatorydiagnosticprocesserrorsprojectredde |