Cargando…
Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation
The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer, thus improving the diagnosis is the primary concern. This article shows a comparison of the results in the identification of computed tomography scans with pulmonary nodules, through the use of different opti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297567/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49076-8_23 |
_version_ | 1783547032898633728 |
---|---|
author | Loeza Mejía, Cecilia Irene Biswal, R. R. Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto |
author_facet | Loeza Mejía, Cecilia Irene Biswal, R. R. Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto |
author_sort | Loeza Mejía, Cecilia Irene |
collection | PubMed |
description | The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer, thus improving the diagnosis is the primary concern. This article shows a comparison of the results in the identification of computed tomography scans with pulmonary nodules, through the use of different optimizers (Adam and Nadam); the effect of the use of pre-processing and segmentation techniques using CNNs is also thoroughly explored. The dataset employed was Lung TIME which is publicly available. When no preprocessing or segmentation was applied, training accuracy above 90.24% and test accuracy above 86.8% were obtained. In contrast, when segmentation was applied without preprocessing, a training accuracy above 97.19% and test accuracy above 95.07% were reached. On the other hand, when preprocessing and segmentation was applied, a training accuracy above 96.41% and test accuracy above 94.71% were achieved. On average, the Adam optimizer scored a training accuracy of 96.17% and a test accuracy of 95.23%. Whereas, the Nadam optimizer obtained 96.25% and 95.2%, respectively. It is concluded that CNN has a good performance even when working with images with noise. The performance of the network was similar when working with preprocessing and segmentation than when using only segmentation. Also, it can be inferred that, the application of preprocessing and segmentation is an excellent option when it is required to improve accuracy in CNNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7297567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72975672020-06-17 Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation Loeza Mejía, Cecilia Irene Biswal, R. R. Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto Pattern Recognition Article The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules plays an important role in the treatment of lung cancer, thus improving the diagnosis is the primary concern. This article shows a comparison of the results in the identification of computed tomography scans with pulmonary nodules, through the use of different optimizers (Adam and Nadam); the effect of the use of pre-processing and segmentation techniques using CNNs is also thoroughly explored. The dataset employed was Lung TIME which is publicly available. When no preprocessing or segmentation was applied, training accuracy above 90.24% and test accuracy above 86.8% were obtained. In contrast, when segmentation was applied without preprocessing, a training accuracy above 97.19% and test accuracy above 95.07% were reached. On the other hand, when preprocessing and segmentation was applied, a training accuracy above 96.41% and test accuracy above 94.71% were achieved. On average, the Adam optimizer scored a training accuracy of 96.17% and a test accuracy of 95.23%. Whereas, the Nadam optimizer obtained 96.25% and 95.2%, respectively. It is concluded that CNN has a good performance even when working with images with noise. The performance of the network was similar when working with preprocessing and segmentation than when using only segmentation. Also, it can be inferred that, the application of preprocessing and segmentation is an excellent option when it is required to improve accuracy in CNNs. 2020-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7297567/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49076-8_23 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Loeza Mejía, Cecilia Irene Biswal, R. R. Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo Ochoa-Ruiz, Gilberto Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title | Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title_full | Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title_fullStr | Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title_short | Accurate Identification of Tomograms of Lung Nodules Using CNN: Influence of the Optimizer, Preprocessing and Segmentation |
title_sort | accurate identification of tomograms of lung nodules using cnn: influence of the optimizer, preprocessing and segmentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297567/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49076-8_23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loezamejiaceciliairene accurateidentificationoftomogramsoflungnodulesusingcnninfluenceoftheoptimizerpreprocessingandsegmentation AT biswalrr accurateidentificationoftomogramsoflungnodulesusingcnninfluenceoftheoptimizerpreprocessingandsegmentation AT rodrigueztelloeduardo accurateidentificationoftomogramsoflungnodulesusingcnninfluenceoftheoptimizerpreprocessingandsegmentation AT ochoaruizgilberto accurateidentificationoftomogramsoflungnodulesusingcnninfluenceoftheoptimizerpreprocessingandsegmentation |