Cargando…
Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study
PURPOSE: There is growing interest in low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective case–control analysis, we compared the efficacy of LDMC and conventional chemotherapy (CCT) in MBC. METHODS: Each LDMC patient receiving oral cyclophosphamide (CTX)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05711-5 |
_version_ | 1783547061758590976 |
---|---|
author | Krajnak, S. Schnatz, C. Almstedt, K. Brenner, W. Haertner, F. Heimes, A.-S. Lebrecht, A. Makris, G.-M. Schwab, R. Hasenburg, A. Schmidt, M. Battista, M. J. |
author_facet | Krajnak, S. Schnatz, C. Almstedt, K. Brenner, W. Haertner, F. Heimes, A.-S. Lebrecht, A. Makris, G.-M. Schwab, R. Hasenburg, A. Schmidt, M. Battista, M. J. |
author_sort | Krajnak, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is growing interest in low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective case–control analysis, we compared the efficacy of LDMC and conventional chemotherapy (CCT) in MBC. METHODS: Each LDMC patient receiving oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (50 mg daily) and methotrexate (MTX) (2.5 mg every other day) was matched with two controls who received CCT. Age, number of chemotherapy lines and metastatic sites as well as hormone receptor (HR) status were considered as matching criteria. Primary endpoint was disease control rate longer than 24 weeks (DCR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR) and subgroup analyses using the matching criteria. RESULTS: 40 cases and 80 controls entered the study. 30.0% patients with LDMC and 22.5% patients with CCT showed DCR (p = 0.380). The median PFS was 12.0 weeks in both groups (p = 0.218) and the median DoR was 31.0 vs. 20.5 weeks (p = 0.383), respectively. Among younger patients, DCR was 40.0% in LDMC vs. 25.0% in the CCT group (p = 0.249). DCR was achieved in 33.3% vs. 26.2% non-heavily pretreated patients (p = 0.568) and in 36.0% vs. 18.0% patients without multiple metastases (p = 0.096), respectively. In the HR-positive group, 30.0% LDMC vs. 28.3% CCT patients showed DCR (p = 1.000). Among triple-negative patients, DCR was achieved in 30.0% LDMC and 5.0% CCT patients (p = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a similar efficacy of LDMC compared to CCT in the treatment of MBC. Thus, LDMC may be a valuable treatment option in selected MBC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7297707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72977072020-06-19 Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study Krajnak, S. Schnatz, C. Almstedt, K. Brenner, W. Haertner, F. Heimes, A.-S. Lebrecht, A. Makris, G.-M. Schwab, R. Hasenburg, A. Schmidt, M. Battista, M. J. Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial PURPOSE: There is growing interest in low-dose metronomic chemotherapy (LDMC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this retrospective case–control analysis, we compared the efficacy of LDMC and conventional chemotherapy (CCT) in MBC. METHODS: Each LDMC patient receiving oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) (50 mg daily) and methotrexate (MTX) (2.5 mg every other day) was matched with two controls who received CCT. Age, number of chemotherapy lines and metastatic sites as well as hormone receptor (HR) status were considered as matching criteria. Primary endpoint was disease control rate longer than 24 weeks (DCR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR) and subgroup analyses using the matching criteria. RESULTS: 40 cases and 80 controls entered the study. 30.0% patients with LDMC and 22.5% patients with CCT showed DCR (p = 0.380). The median PFS was 12.0 weeks in both groups (p = 0.218) and the median DoR was 31.0 vs. 20.5 weeks (p = 0.383), respectively. Among younger patients, DCR was 40.0% in LDMC vs. 25.0% in the CCT group (p = 0.249). DCR was achieved in 33.3% vs. 26.2% non-heavily pretreated patients (p = 0.568) and in 36.0% vs. 18.0% patients without multiple metastases (p = 0.096), respectively. In the HR-positive group, 30.0% LDMC vs. 28.3% CCT patients showed DCR (p = 1.000). Among triple-negative patients, DCR was achieved in 30.0% LDMC and 5.0% CCT patients (p = 0.095). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a similar efficacy of LDMC compared to CCT in the treatment of MBC. Thus, LDMC may be a valuable treatment option in selected MBC patients. Springer US 2020-06-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7297707/ /pubmed/32495001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05711-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Krajnak, S. Schnatz, C. Almstedt, K. Brenner, W. Haertner, F. Heimes, A.-S. Lebrecht, A. Makris, G.-M. Schwab, R. Hasenburg, A. Schmidt, M. Battista, M. J. Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title | Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title_full | Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title_fullStr | Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title_short | Low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
title_sort | low-dose metronomic chemotherapy as an efficient treatment option in metastatic breast cancer—results of an exploratory case–control study |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05711-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krajnaks lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT schnatzc lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT almstedtk lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT brennerw lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT haertnerf lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT heimesas lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT lebrechta lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT makrisgm lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT schwabr lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT hasenburga lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT schmidtm lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy AT battistamj lowdosemetronomicchemotherapyasanefficienttreatmentoptioninmetastaticbreastcancerresultsofanexploratorycasecontrolstudy |