Cargando…

What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues

Olfactory cues play an important role in mammalian biology, but have been challenging to assess in the field. Current methods pose problematic issues with sample storage and transportation, limiting our ability to connect chemical variation in scents with relevant ecological and behavioral contexts....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Cynthia L., Bottenberg, Kimberly N., Lantz, Andrew W., de Oliveira, Maria A. B., Melo, Leonardo C. O., Vinyard, Christopher J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6224
_version_ 1783547080372912128
author Thompson, Cynthia L.
Bottenberg, Kimberly N.
Lantz, Andrew W.
de Oliveira, Maria A. B.
Melo, Leonardo C. O.
Vinyard, Christopher J.
author_facet Thompson, Cynthia L.
Bottenberg, Kimberly N.
Lantz, Andrew W.
de Oliveira, Maria A. B.
Melo, Leonardo C. O.
Vinyard, Christopher J.
author_sort Thompson, Cynthia L.
collection PubMed
description Olfactory cues play an important role in mammalian biology, but have been challenging to assess in the field. Current methods pose problematic issues with sample storage and transportation, limiting our ability to connect chemical variation in scents with relevant ecological and behavioral contexts. Real‐time, in‐field analysis via portable gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) has the potential to overcome these issues, but with trade‐offs of reduced sensitivity and compound mass range. We field‐tested the ability of portable GC‐MS to support two representative applications of chemical ecology research with a wild arboreal primate, common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). We developed methods to (a) evaluate the chemical composition of marmoset scent marks deposited at feeding sites and (b) characterize the scent profiles of exudates eaten by marmosets. We successfully collected marmoset scent marks across several canopy heights, with the portable GC‐MS detecting known components of marmoset glandular secretions and differentiating these from in‐field controls. Likewise, variation in the chemical profile of scent marks demonstrated a significant correlation with marmoset feeding behavior, indicating these scents’ biological relevance. The portable GC‐MS also delineated species‐specific olfactory signatures of exudates fed on by marmosets. Despite the trade‐offs, portable GC‐MS represents a viable option for characterizing olfactory compounds used by wild mammals, yielding biologically relevant data. While the decision to adopt portable GC‐MS will likely depend on site‐ and project‐specific needs, our ability to conduct two example applications under relatively challenging field conditions bodes well for the versatility of in‐field GC‐MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7297786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72977862020-06-17 What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues Thompson, Cynthia L. Bottenberg, Kimberly N. Lantz, Andrew W. de Oliveira, Maria A. B. Melo, Leonardo C. O. Vinyard, Christopher J. Ecol Evol Original Research Olfactory cues play an important role in mammalian biology, but have been challenging to assess in the field. Current methods pose problematic issues with sample storage and transportation, limiting our ability to connect chemical variation in scents with relevant ecological and behavioral contexts. Real‐time, in‐field analysis via portable gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC‐MS) has the potential to overcome these issues, but with trade‐offs of reduced sensitivity and compound mass range. We field‐tested the ability of portable GC‐MS to support two representative applications of chemical ecology research with a wild arboreal primate, common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus). We developed methods to (a) evaluate the chemical composition of marmoset scent marks deposited at feeding sites and (b) characterize the scent profiles of exudates eaten by marmosets. We successfully collected marmoset scent marks across several canopy heights, with the portable GC‐MS detecting known components of marmoset glandular secretions and differentiating these from in‐field controls. Likewise, variation in the chemical profile of scent marks demonstrated a significant correlation with marmoset feeding behavior, indicating these scents’ biological relevance. The portable GC‐MS also delineated species‐specific olfactory signatures of exudates fed on by marmosets. Despite the trade‐offs, portable GC‐MS represents a viable option for characterizing olfactory compounds used by wild mammals, yielding biologically relevant data. While the decision to adopt portable GC‐MS will likely depend on site‐ and project‐specific needs, our ability to conduct two example applications under relatively challenging field conditions bodes well for the versatility of in‐field GC‐MS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7297786/ /pubmed/32551053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6224 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thompson, Cynthia L.
Bottenberg, Kimberly N.
Lantz, Andrew W.
de Oliveira, Maria A. B.
Melo, Leonardo C. O.
Vinyard, Christopher J.
What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title_full What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title_fullStr What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title_full_unstemmed What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title_short What smells? Developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
title_sort what smells? developing in‐field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6224
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsoncynthial whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues
AT bottenbergkimberlyn whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues
AT lantzandreww whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues
AT deoliveiramariaab whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues
AT meloleonardoco whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues
AT vinyardchristopherj whatsmellsdevelopinginfieldmethodstocharacterizethechemicalcompositionofwildmammalianscentcues