Cargando…

Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fast acquisition MRI in suspected cases of paediatric appendicitis presenting to a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken between May and October 2017 of 52 children who presented with suspected appendici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Karl, Duffy, Patrick, Kavanagh, Richard G., Carey, Brian W., Power, Stephen, Ryan, David, Joyce, Stella, Feeley, Aoife, Murphy, Peter, Andrews, Emmet, McEntee, Mark F., Moore, Michael, Bogue, Conor, Maher, Michael M., O’ Connor, Owen J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00882-7
_version_ 1783547101056073728
author James, Karl
Duffy, Patrick
Kavanagh, Richard G.
Carey, Brian W.
Power, Stephen
Ryan, David
Joyce, Stella
Feeley, Aoife
Murphy, Peter
Andrews, Emmet
McEntee, Mark F.
Moore, Michael
Bogue, Conor
Maher, Michael M.
O’ Connor, Owen J.
author_facet James, Karl
Duffy, Patrick
Kavanagh, Richard G.
Carey, Brian W.
Power, Stephen
Ryan, David
Joyce, Stella
Feeley, Aoife
Murphy, Peter
Andrews, Emmet
McEntee, Mark F.
Moore, Michael
Bogue, Conor
Maher, Michael M.
O’ Connor, Owen J.
author_sort James, Karl
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fast acquisition MRI in suspected cases of paediatric appendicitis presenting to a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken between May and October 2017 of 52 children who presented with suspected appendicitis and were referred for an abdominal ultrasound. All patients included in this study received both an abdominal ultrasound and five-sequence MRI consisting of axial and coronal gradient echo T2 scans, fat-saturated SSFSE and a diffusion-weighted scan. Participants were randomised into groups of MRI with breath-holds or MRI with free breathing. A patient satisfaction survey was also carried out. Histopathology findings, where available, were used as a gold standard for the purposes of data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity of 25% and 92.9%, respectively. MRI with breath-hold had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 66.7%, respectively, whilst MRI with free breathing was superior with sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 84.2%, respectively. MRI with free breathing was also more time efficient (p < 0.0001). Group statistics were comparable (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of fast acquisition MRI protocols, particularly free breathing sequences, for patients admitted with suspected appendicitis can result in faster diagnosis, treatment and discharge. It also has a statistically significant diagnostic advantage over ultrasound. Additionally, the higher specificity of MR can reduce the number of negative appendectomies performed in tertiary centres.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7297877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72978772020-06-22 Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients James, Karl Duffy, Patrick Kavanagh, Richard G. Carey, Brian W. Power, Stephen Ryan, David Joyce, Stella Feeley, Aoife Murphy, Peter Andrews, Emmet McEntee, Mark F. Moore, Michael Bogue, Conor Maher, Michael M. O’ Connor, Owen J. Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fast acquisition MRI in suspected cases of paediatric appendicitis presenting to a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken between May and October 2017 of 52 children who presented with suspected appendicitis and were referred for an abdominal ultrasound. All patients included in this study received both an abdominal ultrasound and five-sequence MRI consisting of axial and coronal gradient echo T2 scans, fat-saturated SSFSE and a diffusion-weighted scan. Participants were randomised into groups of MRI with breath-holds or MRI with free breathing. A patient satisfaction survey was also carried out. Histopathology findings, where available, were used as a gold standard for the purposes of data analysis. Statistical analysis was performed, and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ultrasound had a sensitivity and specificity of 25% and 92.9%, respectively. MRI with breath-hold had a sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 66.7%, respectively, whilst MRI with free breathing was superior with sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 84.2%, respectively. MRI with free breathing was also more time efficient (p < 0.0001). Group statistics were comparable (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of fast acquisition MRI protocols, particularly free breathing sequences, for patients admitted with suspected appendicitis can result in faster diagnosis, treatment and discharge. It also has a statistically significant diagnostic advantage over ultrasound. Additionally, the higher specificity of MR can reduce the number of negative appendectomies performed in tertiary centres. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7297877/ /pubmed/32548771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00882-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
James, Karl
Duffy, Patrick
Kavanagh, Richard G.
Carey, Brian W.
Power, Stephen
Ryan, David
Joyce, Stella
Feeley, Aoife
Murphy, Peter
Andrews, Emmet
McEntee, Mark F.
Moore, Michael
Bogue, Conor
Maher, Michael M.
O’ Connor, Owen J.
Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title_full Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title_fullStr Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title_short Fast acquisition abdominal MRI study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
title_sort fast acquisition abdominal mri study for the investigation of suspected acute appendicitis in paediatric patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7297877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32548771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00882-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jameskarl fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT duffypatrick fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT kavanaghrichardg fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT careybrianw fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT powerstephen fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT ryandavid fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT joycestella fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT feeleyaoife fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT murphypeter fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT andrewsemmet fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT mcenteemarkf fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT mooremichael fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT bogueconor fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT mahermichaelm fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients
AT oconnorowenj fastacquisitionabdominalmristudyfortheinvestigationofsuspectedacuteappendicitisinpaediatricpatients