Cargando…
Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for all US residents aged ≥6 months. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) varies by age, circulating influenza strains, and the presence of high‐risk medical conditions. We examined site‐specific VE in the US Influenza VE Network, which evaluates annual influen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12741 |
_version_ | 1783547178336124928 |
---|---|
author | Balasubramani, Goundappa K. Nowalk, Mary Patricia Sax, Theresa M. Suyama, Joe Bobyock, Emily Rinaldo, Charles R. Martin, Emily T. Monto, Arnold S. Jackson, Michael L. Gaglani, Manjusha J. Flannery, Brendan Chung, Jessie R. Zimmerman, Richard K. |
author_facet | Balasubramani, Goundappa K. Nowalk, Mary Patricia Sax, Theresa M. Suyama, Joe Bobyock, Emily Rinaldo, Charles R. Martin, Emily T. Monto, Arnold S. Jackson, Michael L. Gaglani, Manjusha J. Flannery, Brendan Chung, Jessie R. Zimmerman, Richard K. |
author_sort | Balasubramani, Goundappa K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for all US residents aged ≥6 months. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) varies by age, circulating influenza strains, and the presence of high‐risk medical conditions. We examined site‐specific VE in the US Influenza VE Network, which evaluates annual influenza VE at ambulatory clinics in geographically diverse sites. METHODS: Analyses were conducted on 27 180 outpatients ≥6 months old presenting with an acute respiratory infection (ARI) with cough of ≤7‐day duration during the 2011‐2016 influenza seasons. A test‐negative design was used with vaccination status defined as receipt of ≥1 dose of any influenza vaccine according to medical records, registries, and/or self‐report. Influenza infection was determined by reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction. VE estimates were calculated using odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, time from illness onset to enrollment, high‐risk conditions, calendar time, and vaccination status‐site interaction. RESULTS: For all sites combined, VE was statistically significant every season against all influenza and against the predominant circulating strains (VE = 19%‐50%) Few differences among four sites in the US Flu VE Network were evident in five seasons. However, in 2015‐16, overall VE in one site was 24% (95% CI = −4%‐44%), while VE in two other sites was significantly higher (61%, 95% CI = 49%‐71%; P = .002, and 53%, 95% CI = 33,67; P = .034). CONCLUSION: With few exceptions, site‐specific VE estimates aligned with each other and overall VE estimates. Observed VE may reflect inherent differences in community characteristics of the sites and highlights the importance of diverse settings for studying influenza vaccine effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7298285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72982852020-07-01 Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 Balasubramani, Goundappa K. Nowalk, Mary Patricia Sax, Theresa M. Suyama, Joe Bobyock, Emily Rinaldo, Charles R. Martin, Emily T. Monto, Arnold S. Jackson, Michael L. Gaglani, Manjusha J. Flannery, Brendan Chung, Jessie R. Zimmerman, Richard K. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Original Articles BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended for all US residents aged ≥6 months. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) varies by age, circulating influenza strains, and the presence of high‐risk medical conditions. We examined site‐specific VE in the US Influenza VE Network, which evaluates annual influenza VE at ambulatory clinics in geographically diverse sites. METHODS: Analyses were conducted on 27 180 outpatients ≥6 months old presenting with an acute respiratory infection (ARI) with cough of ≤7‐day duration during the 2011‐2016 influenza seasons. A test‐negative design was used with vaccination status defined as receipt of ≥1 dose of any influenza vaccine according to medical records, registries, and/or self‐report. Influenza infection was determined by reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction. VE estimates were calculated using odds ratios from multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, time from illness onset to enrollment, high‐risk conditions, calendar time, and vaccination status‐site interaction. RESULTS: For all sites combined, VE was statistically significant every season against all influenza and against the predominant circulating strains (VE = 19%‐50%) Few differences among four sites in the US Flu VE Network were evident in five seasons. However, in 2015‐16, overall VE in one site was 24% (95% CI = −4%‐44%), while VE in two other sites was significantly higher (61%, 95% CI = 49%‐71%; P = .002, and 53%, 95% CI = 33,67; P = .034). CONCLUSION: With few exceptions, site‐specific VE estimates aligned with each other and overall VE estimates. Observed VE may reflect inherent differences in community characteristics of the sites and highlights the importance of diverse settings for studying influenza vaccine effectiveness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-16 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7298285/ /pubmed/32298048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12741 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Balasubramani, Goundappa K. Nowalk, Mary Patricia Sax, Theresa M. Suyama, Joe Bobyock, Emily Rinaldo, Charles R. Martin, Emily T. Monto, Arnold S. Jackson, Michael L. Gaglani, Manjusha J. Flannery, Brendan Chung, Jessie R. Zimmerman, Richard K. Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title | Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title_full | Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title_fullStr | Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title_short | Influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network by study site 2011‐2016 |
title_sort | influenza vaccine effectiveness among outpatients in the us influenza vaccine effectiveness network by study site 2011‐2016 |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32298048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balasubramanigoundappak influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT nowalkmarypatricia influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT saxtheresam influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT suyamajoe influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT bobyockemily influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT rinaldocharlesr influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT martinemilyt influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT montoarnolds influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT jacksonmichaell influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT gaglanimanjushaj influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT flannerybrendan influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT chungjessier influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 AT zimmermanrichardk influenzavaccineeffectivenessamongoutpatientsintheusinfluenzavaccineeffectivenessnetworkbystudysite20112016 |