Cargando…
Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness
Widespread implementation of electronic health records has led to the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) and computer modeling in clinical medicine. The early recognition and treatment of critical illness are central to good outcomes but are made difficult by, among other things, the comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577412 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.13 |
_version_ | 1783547234591178752 |
---|---|
author | Lal, Amos Pinevich, Yuliya Gajic, Ognjen Herasevich, Vitaly Pickering, Brian |
author_facet | Lal, Amos Pinevich, Yuliya Gajic, Ognjen Herasevich, Vitaly Pickering, Brian |
author_sort | Lal, Amos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Widespread implementation of electronic health records has led to the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) and computer modeling in clinical medicine. The early recognition and treatment of critical illness are central to good outcomes but are made difficult by, among other things, the complexity of the environment and the often non-specific nature of the clinical presentation. Increasingly, AI applications are being proposed as decision supports for busy or distracted clinicians, to address this challenge. Data driven “associative” AI models are built from retrospective data registries with missing data and imprecise timing. Associative AI models lack transparency, often ignore causal mechanisms, and, while potentially useful in improved prognostication, have thus far had limited clinical applicability. To be clinically useful, AI tools need to provide bedside clinicians with actionable knowledge. Explicitly addressing causal mechanisms not only increases validity and replicability of the model, but also adds transparency and helps gain trust from the bedside clinicians for real world use of AI models in teaching and patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7298588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72985882020-06-22 Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness Lal, Amos Pinevich, Yuliya Gajic, Ognjen Herasevich, Vitaly Pickering, Brian World J Crit Care Med Minireviews Widespread implementation of electronic health records has led to the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) and computer modeling in clinical medicine. The early recognition and treatment of critical illness are central to good outcomes but are made difficult by, among other things, the complexity of the environment and the often non-specific nature of the clinical presentation. Increasingly, AI applications are being proposed as decision supports for busy or distracted clinicians, to address this challenge. Data driven “associative” AI models are built from retrospective data registries with missing data and imprecise timing. Associative AI models lack transparency, often ignore causal mechanisms, and, while potentially useful in improved prognostication, have thus far had limited clinical applicability. To be clinically useful, AI tools need to provide bedside clinicians with actionable knowledge. Explicitly addressing causal mechanisms not only increases validity and replicability of the model, but also adds transparency and helps gain trust from the bedside clinicians for real world use of AI models in teaching and patient care. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7298588/ /pubmed/32577412 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.13 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Lal, Amos Pinevich, Yuliya Gajic, Ognjen Herasevich, Vitaly Pickering, Brian Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title | Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title_full | Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title_short | Artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
title_sort | artificial intelligence and computer simulation models in critical illness |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577412 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lalamos artificialintelligenceandcomputersimulationmodelsincriticalillness AT pinevichyuliya artificialintelligenceandcomputersimulationmodelsincriticalillness AT gajicognjen artificialintelligenceandcomputersimulationmodelsincriticalillness AT herasevichvitaly artificialintelligenceandcomputersimulationmodelsincriticalillness AT pickeringbrian artificialintelligenceandcomputersimulationmodelsincriticalillness |