Cargando…

Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)

BACKGROUND: A diverse country like India may have variable intensive care units (ICUs) practices at state and city levels. AIM: To gain insight into clinical services and processes of care in ICUs in India, this would help plan for potential educational and quality improvement interventions. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kashyap, Rahul, Vashistha, Kirtivardhan, Saini, Chetan, Dutt, Taru, Raman, Dileep, Bansal, Vikas, Singh, Harpreet, Bhandari, Geeta, Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan, Seth, Harshit, Sharma, Divya, Seshadri, Premkumar, Daga, Mradul Kumar, Gurjar, Mohan, Javeri, Yash, Surani, Salim, Varon, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.31
_version_ 1783547234825011200
author Kashyap, Rahul
Vashistha, Kirtivardhan
Saini, Chetan
Dutt, Taru
Raman, Dileep
Bansal, Vikas
Singh, Harpreet
Bhandari, Geeta
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Seth, Harshit
Sharma, Divya
Seshadri, Premkumar
Daga, Mradul Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Javeri, Yash
Surani, Salim
Varon, Joseph
author_facet Kashyap, Rahul
Vashistha, Kirtivardhan
Saini, Chetan
Dutt, Taru
Raman, Dileep
Bansal, Vikas
Singh, Harpreet
Bhandari, Geeta
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Seth, Harshit
Sharma, Divya
Seshadri, Premkumar
Daga, Mradul Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Javeri, Yash
Surani, Salim
Varon, Joseph
author_sort Kashyap, Rahul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A diverse country like India may have variable intensive care units (ICUs) practices at state and city levels. AIM: To gain insight into clinical services and processes of care in ICUs in India, this would help plan for potential educational and quality improvement interventions. METHODS: The Indian ICU needs assessment research group of diverse-skilled individuals was formed. A pan- India survey "Indian National ICU Needs" assessment (ININ 2018-I) was designed on google forms and deployed from July 23(rd)-August 25(th), 2018. The survey was sent to select distribution lists of ICU providers from all 29 states and 7 union territories (UTs). In addition to emails and phone calls, social medial applications-WhatsApp™, Facebook™ and LinkedIn™ were used to remind and motivate providers. By completing and submitting the survey, providers gave their consent for research purposes. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULTS: There were total 134 adult/adult-pediatrics ICU responses from 24 (83% out of 29) states, and two (28% out of 7) UTs in 61 cities. They had median (IQR) 16 (10-25) beds and most, were mixed medical-surgical, 111(83%), with 108(81%) being adult-only ICUs. Representative responders were young, median (IQR), 38 (32-44) years age and majority, n = 108 (81%) were males. The consultants were, n = 101 (75%). A total of 77 (57%) reported to have 24 h in-house intensivist. A total of 68 (51%) ICUs reported to have either 2:1 or 2≥:1 patient:nurse ratio. More than 80% of the ICUs were open, and mixed type. Protocols followed regularly by the ICUs included sepsis care, ventilator- associated pneumonia (83% each); nutrition (82%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (87%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (88%) and glycemic control (92%). Digital infrastructure was found to be poor, with only 46 % of the ICUs reporting high-speed internet availability. CONCLUSION: In this large, national, semi-structured, need-assessment survey, the need for improved manpower including; in-house intensivists, and decreasing patient-to-nurse ratios was evident. Sepsis was the most common diagnosis and quality and research initiatives to decrease sepsis mortality and ICU length of stay could be prioritized. Additionally, subsequent surveys can focus on digital infrastructure for standardized care and efficient resource utilization and enhancing compliance with existing protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7298589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72985892020-06-22 Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018) Kashyap, Rahul Vashistha, Kirtivardhan Saini, Chetan Dutt, Taru Raman, Dileep Bansal, Vikas Singh, Harpreet Bhandari, Geeta Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Seth, Harshit Sharma, Divya Seshadri, Premkumar Daga, Mradul Kumar Gurjar, Mohan Javeri, Yash Surani, Salim Varon, Joseph World J Crit Care Med Observational Study BACKGROUND: A diverse country like India may have variable intensive care units (ICUs) practices at state and city levels. AIM: To gain insight into clinical services and processes of care in ICUs in India, this would help plan for potential educational and quality improvement interventions. METHODS: The Indian ICU needs assessment research group of diverse-skilled individuals was formed. A pan- India survey "Indian National ICU Needs" assessment (ININ 2018-I) was designed on google forms and deployed from July 23(rd)-August 25(th), 2018. The survey was sent to select distribution lists of ICU providers from all 29 states and 7 union territories (UTs). In addition to emails and phone calls, social medial applications-WhatsApp™, Facebook™ and LinkedIn™ were used to remind and motivate providers. By completing and submitting the survey, providers gave their consent for research purposes. This study was deemed eligible for category-2 Institutional Review Board exempt status. RESULTS: There were total 134 adult/adult-pediatrics ICU responses from 24 (83% out of 29) states, and two (28% out of 7) UTs in 61 cities. They had median (IQR) 16 (10-25) beds and most, were mixed medical-surgical, 111(83%), with 108(81%) being adult-only ICUs. Representative responders were young, median (IQR), 38 (32-44) years age and majority, n = 108 (81%) were males. The consultants were, n = 101 (75%). A total of 77 (57%) reported to have 24 h in-house intensivist. A total of 68 (51%) ICUs reported to have either 2:1 or 2≥:1 patient:nurse ratio. More than 80% of the ICUs were open, and mixed type. Protocols followed regularly by the ICUs included sepsis care, ventilator- associated pneumonia (83% each); nutrition (82%), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (87%), stress ulcer prophylaxis (88%) and glycemic control (92%). Digital infrastructure was found to be poor, with only 46 % of the ICUs reporting high-speed internet availability. CONCLUSION: In this large, national, semi-structured, need-assessment survey, the need for improved manpower including; in-house intensivists, and decreasing patient-to-nurse ratios was evident. Sepsis was the most common diagnosis and quality and research initiatives to decrease sepsis mortality and ICU length of stay could be prioritized. Additionally, subsequent surveys can focus on digital infrastructure for standardized care and efficient resource utilization and enhancing compliance with existing protocols. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7298589/ /pubmed/32577414 http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.31 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Kashyap, Rahul
Vashistha, Kirtivardhan
Saini, Chetan
Dutt, Taru
Raman, Dileep
Bansal, Vikas
Singh, Harpreet
Bhandari, Geeta
Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan
Seth, Harshit
Sharma, Divya
Seshadri, Premkumar
Daga, Mradul Kumar
Gurjar, Mohan
Javeri, Yash
Surani, Salim
Varon, Joseph
Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title_full Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title_fullStr Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title_full_unstemmed Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title_short Critical care practice in India: Results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (ININ2018)
title_sort critical care practice in india: results of the intensive care unit need assessment survey (inin2018)
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577414
http://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v9.i2.31
work_keys_str_mv AT kashyaprahul criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT vashisthakirtivardhan criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT sainichetan criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT dutttaru criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT ramandileep criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT bansalvikas criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT singhharpreet criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT bhandarigeeta criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT ramakrishnannagarajan criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT sethharshit criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT sharmadivya criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT seshadripremkumar criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT dagamradulkumar criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT gurjarmohan criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT javeriyash criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT suranisalim criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT varonjoseph criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018
AT criticalcarepracticeinindiaresultsoftheintensivecareunitneedassessmentsurveyinin2018