Cargando…

Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy

In late February and early March 2020, Italy became the European epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite increasingly stringent containment measures enforced by the government, the health system faced an enormous pressure, and extraordinary efforts were made in order to increase overall hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Craxì, Lucia, Vergano, Marco, Savulescu, Julian, Wilkinson, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00127-1
_version_ 1783547251426066432
author Craxì, Lucia
Vergano, Marco
Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_facet Craxì, Lucia
Vergano, Marco
Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
author_sort Craxì, Lucia
collection PubMed
description In late February and early March 2020, Italy became the European epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite increasingly stringent containment measures enforced by the government, the health system faced an enormous pressure, and extraordinary efforts were made in order to increase overall hospital beds’ availability and especially ICU capacity. Nevertheless, the hardest-hit hospitals in Northern Italy experienced a shortage of ICU beds and resources that led to hard allocating choices. At the beginning of March 2020, the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) issued recommendations aimed at supporting physicians in prioritizing patients when the number of critically ill patients overwhelm the capacity of ICUs. One motivating concern for the SIAARTI guidance was that, if no balanced and consistent allocation procedures were applied to prioritize patients, there would be a concrete risk for unfair choices, and that the prevalent “first come, first served” principle would lead to many avoidable deaths. Among the drivers of decision for admission to ICUs, age, comorbidities, and preexisting functional status were included. The recommendations were criticized as ageist and potentially discriminatory against elderly patients. Looking forward to the next steps, the Italian experience can be relevant to other parts of the world that are yet to see a significant surge of COVID-19: the need for transparent triage criteria and commonly shared values give the Italian recommendations even greater legitimacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7298692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72986922020-06-17 Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy Craxì, Lucia Vergano, Marco Savulescu, Julian Wilkinson, Dominic Asian Bioeth Rev Perspective In late February and early March 2020, Italy became the European epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite increasingly stringent containment measures enforced by the government, the health system faced an enormous pressure, and extraordinary efforts were made in order to increase overall hospital beds’ availability and especially ICU capacity. Nevertheless, the hardest-hit hospitals in Northern Italy experienced a shortage of ICU beds and resources that led to hard allocating choices. At the beginning of March 2020, the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) issued recommendations aimed at supporting physicians in prioritizing patients when the number of critically ill patients overwhelm the capacity of ICUs. One motivating concern for the SIAARTI guidance was that, if no balanced and consistent allocation procedures were applied to prioritize patients, there would be a concrete risk for unfair choices, and that the prevalent “first come, first served” principle would lead to many avoidable deaths. Among the drivers of decision for admission to ICUs, age, comorbidities, and preexisting functional status were included. The recommendations were criticized as ageist and potentially discriminatory against elderly patients. Looking forward to the next steps, the Italian experience can be relevant to other parts of the world that are yet to see a significant surge of COVID-19: the need for transparent triage criteria and commonly shared values give the Italian recommendations even greater legitimacy. Springer Singapore 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7298692/ /pubmed/32837554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00127-1 Text en © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
spellingShingle Perspective
Craxì, Lucia
Vergano, Marco
Savulescu, Julian
Wilkinson, Dominic
Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title_full Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title_fullStr Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title_full_unstemmed Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title_short Rationing in a Pandemic: Lessons from Italy
title_sort rationing in a pandemic: lessons from italy
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00127-1
work_keys_str_mv AT craxilucia rationinginapandemiclessonsfromitaly
AT verganomarco rationinginapandemiclessonsfromitaly
AT savulescujulian rationinginapandemiclessonsfromitaly
AT wilkinsondominic rationinginapandemiclessonsfromitaly