Cargando…

The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research

BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research entails doing research ‘with’ the public. Successful PPI requires a diversity of patients’ perspectives and experiences. In Singapore, including the public’s voice in research is still in its infancy and different ways of involving...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luna Puerta, L., Smith, H. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00205-6
_version_ 1783547277103595520
author Luna Puerta, L.
Smith, H. E.
author_facet Luna Puerta, L.
Smith, H. E.
author_sort Luna Puerta, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research entails doing research ‘with’ the public. Successful PPI requires a diversity of patients’ perspectives and experiences. In Singapore, including the public’s voice in research is still in its infancy and different ways of involving the public have to be explored. Our aims were to describe a PPI initiative that enables members of the public to share their ideas and opinions about health research, and to assess the feasibility, accessibility and utility of the initiative. METHODS: Building on the concept of the PPI Café used in the west we designed a “PPI Hawker” for Singapore. Here Hawker Centres rather than cafes are used frequently for eating and socialising, providing a one-stop destination for a wide section of society. The PPI facilitators approached people sitting at tables and joined them to discuss questions of relevance to a local research study. Observations and reflexive field notes were used to evaluate the “PPI Hawker’s” feasibility, acceptability and utility in the Singaporean community. RESULTS: In three “PPI Hawkers” we approached 96 people and 72 (75%) engaged in discussions about the design of a population-based research study. The majority (75%) of participants willingly discussed all of the questions posed to them by the researchers, indicating the feasibility of PPI. The PPI participants came from the three major ethnic groups in Singapore and appeared to be broad in age, suggesting “PPI Hawkers” are easily accessible. Both participants and researchers recognised the utility of the “PPI Hawker”, reflecting on people’s willingness to talk about the research issues, engaging in informative conversations and posing relevant questions. CONCLUSION: The “PPI Hawkers” succeeded in engaging the public in conversations about a local population-based study. The public brought to the researchers’ attention a variety of previously unheard perspectives about the research. Each event fostered connectivity between professionals and the public, generating among researchers a more positive perception of the power of public involvement. “PPI Hawkers” provide an opportunity for co-informed conduct of research studies with diverse members of the public. They create a focus within a community setting for researchers to engage with the public. The resources needed (costs and preparatory time) are relatively few. Not only do “PPI Hawkers” have potential in Singapore, but also for the rest of Asia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7298814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72988142020-06-17 The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research Luna Puerta, L. Smith, H. E. Res Involv Engagem Methodology BACKGROUND: Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in health research entails doing research ‘with’ the public. Successful PPI requires a diversity of patients’ perspectives and experiences. In Singapore, including the public’s voice in research is still in its infancy and different ways of involving the public have to be explored. Our aims were to describe a PPI initiative that enables members of the public to share their ideas and opinions about health research, and to assess the feasibility, accessibility and utility of the initiative. METHODS: Building on the concept of the PPI Café used in the west we designed a “PPI Hawker” for Singapore. Here Hawker Centres rather than cafes are used frequently for eating and socialising, providing a one-stop destination for a wide section of society. The PPI facilitators approached people sitting at tables and joined them to discuss questions of relevance to a local research study. Observations and reflexive field notes were used to evaluate the “PPI Hawker’s” feasibility, acceptability and utility in the Singaporean community. RESULTS: In three “PPI Hawkers” we approached 96 people and 72 (75%) engaged in discussions about the design of a population-based research study. The majority (75%) of participants willingly discussed all of the questions posed to them by the researchers, indicating the feasibility of PPI. The PPI participants came from the three major ethnic groups in Singapore and appeared to be broad in age, suggesting “PPI Hawkers” are easily accessible. Both participants and researchers recognised the utility of the “PPI Hawker”, reflecting on people’s willingness to talk about the research issues, engaging in informative conversations and posing relevant questions. CONCLUSION: The “PPI Hawkers” succeeded in engaging the public in conversations about a local population-based study. The public brought to the researchers’ attention a variety of previously unheard perspectives about the research. Each event fostered connectivity between professionals and the public, generating among researchers a more positive perception of the power of public involvement. “PPI Hawkers” provide an opportunity for co-informed conduct of research studies with diverse members of the public. They create a focus within a community setting for researchers to engage with the public. The resources needed (costs and preparatory time) are relatively few. Not only do “PPI Hawkers” have potential in Singapore, but also for the rest of Asia. BioMed Central 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7298814/ /pubmed/32551135 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00205-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Luna Puerta, L.
Smith, H. E.
The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title_full The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title_fullStr The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title_full_unstemmed The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title_short The “PPI Hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research
title_sort “ppi hawker”: an innovative method for patient and public involvement (ppi) in health research
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32551135
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00205-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lunapuertal theppihawkeraninnovativemethodforpatientandpublicinvolvementppiinhealthresearch
AT smithhe theppihawkeraninnovativemethodforpatientandpublicinvolvementppiinhealthresearch
AT lunapuertal ppihawkeraninnovativemethodforpatientandpublicinvolvementppiinhealthresearch
AT smithhe ppihawkeraninnovativemethodforpatientandpublicinvolvementppiinhealthresearch