Cargando…

Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus infection is the most frequent viral congenital infection, with possible consequences such as deafness, or psychomotor retardation. In 2016, the French High Council of Public Health was mandated to update recommendations regarding prevention of cytomegalovirus infection i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Billette de Villemeur, Agathe, Tattevin, Pierre, Salmi, Louis-Rachid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05139-8
_version_ 1783547303268712448
author Billette de Villemeur, Agathe
Tattevin, Pierre
Salmi, Louis-Rachid
author_facet Billette de Villemeur, Agathe
Tattevin, Pierre
Salmi, Louis-Rachid
author_sort Billette de Villemeur, Agathe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus infection is the most frequent viral congenital infection, with possible consequences such as deafness, or psychomotor retardation. In 2016, the French High Council of Public Health was mandated to update recommendations regarding prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women. We summarize a critical appraisal of knowledge and deterministic decision analysis comparing the current no-screening situation to serological screening during pregnancy, and to hygiene promotion. METHODS: Screening was defined as systematic serological testing, during the first trimester, with repeated tests as needed, to all pregnant women. Outcomes were: 1) severe sequela: intellectual deficiency with IQ ≤ 50 or hearing impairment < 70 dB or sight impairment (≤ 3/10 at best eye); 2) moderate sequela: any level of intellectual, hearing or sight deficiency; and 3) death or termination of pregnancy. We simulated the one-year course of cytomegalovirus infection in a cohort of 800,000 pregnant women. We developed a deterministic decision model, using best and min-max estimates, extracted from systematic reviews or original studies. RESULTS: Relevant data were scarce or imprecise. We estimated that 4352 maternal primary infections would result in 1741 foetal infections, and an unknown number of maternal reinfections would result in 1699 foetal infections. There would be 788 cytomegalovirus-related consequences, including 316 foetal deaths or terminations of pregnancy, and 424 moderate and 48 severe sequelae. Screening would result in a 1.66-fold increase of poor outcomes, mostly related to a 2.93-fold increase in deaths and terminations of pregnancy, not compensated by the decrease in severe symptomatic newborns. The promotion of hygiene would result in a 0.75-fold decrease of poor outcomes, related to both a decrease in severe sequelae among symptomatic newborns (RR = 0.75; min-max: 1.00–0.68), and in deaths and terminations of pregnancy (RR = 0.75; min-max: 0.97–0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy should promote hygiene; serological screening should not be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7298945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72989452020-06-18 Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis Billette de Villemeur, Agathe Tattevin, Pierre Salmi, Louis-Rachid BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus infection is the most frequent viral congenital infection, with possible consequences such as deafness, or psychomotor retardation. In 2016, the French High Council of Public Health was mandated to update recommendations regarding prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women. We summarize a critical appraisal of knowledge and deterministic decision analysis comparing the current no-screening situation to serological screening during pregnancy, and to hygiene promotion. METHODS: Screening was defined as systematic serological testing, during the first trimester, with repeated tests as needed, to all pregnant women. Outcomes were: 1) severe sequela: intellectual deficiency with IQ ≤ 50 or hearing impairment < 70 dB or sight impairment (≤ 3/10 at best eye); 2) moderate sequela: any level of intellectual, hearing or sight deficiency; and 3) death or termination of pregnancy. We simulated the one-year course of cytomegalovirus infection in a cohort of 800,000 pregnant women. We developed a deterministic decision model, using best and min-max estimates, extracted from systematic reviews or original studies. RESULTS: Relevant data were scarce or imprecise. We estimated that 4352 maternal primary infections would result in 1741 foetal infections, and an unknown number of maternal reinfections would result in 1699 foetal infections. There would be 788 cytomegalovirus-related consequences, including 316 foetal deaths or terminations of pregnancy, and 424 moderate and 48 severe sequelae. Screening would result in a 1.66-fold increase of poor outcomes, mostly related to a 2.93-fold increase in deaths and terminations of pregnancy, not compensated by the decrease in severe symptomatic newborns. The promotion of hygiene would result in a 0.75-fold decrease of poor outcomes, related to both a decrease in severe sequelae among symptomatic newborns (RR = 0.75; min-max: 1.00–0.68), and in deaths and terminations of pregnancy (RR = 0.75; min-max: 0.97–0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy should promote hygiene; serological screening should not be recommended. BioMed Central 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7298945/ /pubmed/32546244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05139-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Billette de Villemeur, Agathe
Tattevin, Pierre
Salmi, Louis-Rachid
Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title_full Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title_fullStr Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title_short Hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with Cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
title_sort hygiene promotion might be better than serological screening to deal with cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy: a methodological appraisal and decision analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7298945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32546244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05139-8
work_keys_str_mv AT billettedevillemeuragathe hygienepromotionmightbebetterthanserologicalscreeningtodealwithcytomegalovirusinfectionduringpregnancyamethodologicalappraisalanddecisionanalysis
AT tattevinpierre hygienepromotionmightbebetterthanserologicalscreeningtodealwithcytomegalovirusinfectionduringpregnancyamethodologicalappraisalanddecisionanalysis
AT salmilouisrachid hygienepromotionmightbebetterthanserologicalscreeningtodealwithcytomegalovirusinfectionduringpregnancyamethodologicalappraisalanddecisionanalysis
AT hygienepromotionmightbebetterthanserologicalscreeningtodealwithcytomegalovirusinfectionduringpregnancyamethodologicalappraisalanddecisionanalysis