Cargando…

Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to assess the nominal tip diameter, taper and true pilot tip length of three nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files before and after use. METHODS: Three brands of NiTi files of size 25.08 were evaluated: ProTaper Uni-versal (Dentsply Tulsa Specialties, Tulsa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islambasic, Melita, Coelho, Marcelo Santos, Pettiette, Mary T., Tawil, Peter Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566899
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eej.2016.16014
_version_ 1783547327952191488
author Islambasic, Melita
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Pettiette, Mary T.
Tawil, Peter Z.
author_facet Islambasic, Melita
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Pettiette, Mary T.
Tawil, Peter Z.
author_sort Islambasic, Melita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to assess the nominal tip diameter, taper and true pilot tip length of three nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files before and after use. METHODS: Three brands of NiTi files of size 25.08 were evaluated: ProTaper Uni-versal (Dentsply Tulsa Specialties, Tulsa, USA), Channels PT (Insight Endo for Henry Schein, Melville, NY) and ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Specialties), with ten files from each brand (total n=30). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the files at 50x magnification were acquired before and after the files were used on endodontic training blocks, and the images were analysed by two independent investigators using ImageJ software. The nominal tip diameter (D0), taper and true pilot tip length (measured as the distance from the advertised diameter size of the file to the tip of the file) were recorded for each file and were analysed for statistical differences using repeated measures of analysis of variance (r-ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test (P<0.05). RESULTS: The marginal means of the nominal size showed statistically significant differences between brands of the same size; statistically significant differences were also observed between the advertised sizes and the actual sizes (P<0.001). The mean taper values showed statistically significant differences from the advertised (p<0.001) sizes, except for the ProTaper Gold (P=0.023) group. The changes in the true pilot tip length before and after use were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The pilot tip lengths varied between brands. CONCLUSION: All nominal tip diameters and most taper sizes of the analysed brands show statistically significant differences from the nominal sizes advertised by the manufacturers. The differences in true pilot tip lengths between brands indicate a current lack of standardization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72990562020-06-18 Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files Islambasic, Melita Coelho, Marcelo Santos Pettiette, Mary T. Tawil, Peter Z. Eur Endod J Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to assess the nominal tip diameter, taper and true pilot tip length of three nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files before and after use. METHODS: Three brands of NiTi files of size 25.08 were evaluated: ProTaper Uni-versal (Dentsply Tulsa Specialties, Tulsa, USA), Channels PT (Insight Endo for Henry Schein, Melville, NY) and ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Specialties), with ten files from each brand (total n=30). Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the files at 50x magnification were acquired before and after the files were used on endodontic training blocks, and the images were analysed by two independent investigators using ImageJ software. The nominal tip diameter (D0), taper and true pilot tip length (measured as the distance from the advertised diameter size of the file to the tip of the file) were recorded for each file and were analysed for statistical differences using repeated measures of analysis of variance (r-ANOVA) and Tukey’s post-hoc test (P<0.05). RESULTS: The marginal means of the nominal size showed statistically significant differences between brands of the same size; statistically significant differences were also observed between the advertised sizes and the actual sizes (P<0.001). The mean taper values showed statistically significant differences from the advertised (p<0.001) sizes, except for the ProTaper Gold (P=0.023) group. The changes in the true pilot tip length before and after use were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The pilot tip lengths varied between brands. CONCLUSION: All nominal tip diameters and most taper sizes of the analysed brands show statistically significant differences from the nominal sizes advertised by the manufacturers. The differences in true pilot tip lengths between brands indicate a current lack of standardization. Kare Publishing 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7299056/ /pubmed/32566899 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eej.2016.16014 Text en Copyright: © 2016 European Endodontic Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Islambasic, Melita
Coelho, Marcelo Santos
Pettiette, Mary T.
Tawil, Peter Z.
Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title_full Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title_fullStr Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title_full_unstemmed Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title_short Nominal Size and Taper Analysis of Novel Metallurgy NiTi Files
title_sort nominal size and taper analysis of novel metallurgy niti files
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566899
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/eej.2016.16014
work_keys_str_mv AT islambasicmelita nominalsizeandtaperanalysisofnovelmetallurgynitifiles
AT coelhomarcelosantos nominalsizeandtaperanalysisofnovelmetallurgynitifiles
AT pettiettemaryt nominalsizeandtaperanalysisofnovelmetallurgynitifiles
AT tawilpeterz nominalsizeandtaperanalysisofnovelmetallurgynitifiles