Cargando…

Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer

The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cirenajwis, Helena, Lauss, Martin, Planck, Maria, Vallon-Christersson, Johan, Staaf, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30721923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008
_version_ 1783547357312319488
author Cirenajwis, Helena
Lauss, Martin
Planck, Maria
Vallon-Christersson, Johan
Staaf, Johan
author_facet Cirenajwis, Helena
Lauss, Martin
Planck, Maria
Vallon-Christersson, Johan
Staaf, Johan
author_sort Cirenajwis, Helena
collection PubMed
description The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different preprocessing needs like normalization and data centering. In response, a new breed of classifiers, single sample predictors (SSPs), has emerged. SSPs classify samples in an N-of-1 fashion, relying on, e.g. gene rules comparing expression values within a sample. To date, several methods have been reported, but there is a lack of head-to-head performance comparison for typical cancer classification problems, representing an unmet methodological need in cancer bioinformatics. To resolve this need, we performed an evaluation of two SSPs [k-top-scoring pair classifier (kTSP) and absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS)] for two case examples of different magnitude of difficulty in non-small cell lung cancer: gene expression–based classification of (i) tumor histology and (ii) molecular subtype. Through the analysis of ~2000 lung cancer samples for each case example (n = 1918 and n = 2106, respectively), we compared the performance of the methods for different sample compositions, training data set sizes, gene expression platforms and gene rule selections. Three main conclusions are drawn from the comparisons: both methods are platform independent, they select largely overlapping gene rules associated with actual underlying tumor biology and, for large training data sets, they behave interchangeably performance-wise. While SSPs like AIMS and kTSP offer new possibilities to move gene expression signatures/predictors closer to a clinical context, they are still importantly limited by the difficultness of the classification problem at hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72992912020-06-22 Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer Cirenajwis, Helena Lauss, Martin Planck, Maria Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf, Johan Brief Bioinform Case Study The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different preprocessing needs like normalization and data centering. In response, a new breed of classifiers, single sample predictors (SSPs), has emerged. SSPs classify samples in an N-of-1 fashion, relying on, e.g. gene rules comparing expression values within a sample. To date, several methods have been reported, but there is a lack of head-to-head performance comparison for typical cancer classification problems, representing an unmet methodological need in cancer bioinformatics. To resolve this need, we performed an evaluation of two SSPs [k-top-scoring pair classifier (kTSP) and absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS)] for two case examples of different magnitude of difficulty in non-small cell lung cancer: gene expression–based classification of (i) tumor histology and (ii) molecular subtype. Through the analysis of ~2000 lung cancer samples for each case example (n = 1918 and n = 2106, respectively), we compared the performance of the methods for different sample compositions, training data set sizes, gene expression platforms and gene rule selections. Three main conclusions are drawn from the comparisons: both methods are platform independent, they select largely overlapping gene rules associated with actual underlying tumor biology and, for large training data sets, they behave interchangeably performance-wise. While SSPs like AIMS and kTSP offer new possibilities to move gene expression signatures/predictors closer to a clinical context, they are still importantly limited by the difficultness of the classification problem at hand. Oxford University Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7299291/ /pubmed/30721923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Study
Cirenajwis, Helena
Lauss, Martin
Planck, Maria
Vallon-Christersson, Johan
Staaf, Johan
Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title_full Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title_short Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
title_sort performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30721923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008
work_keys_str_mv AT cirenajwishelena performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT laussmartin performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT planckmaria performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT vallonchristerssonjohan performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT staafjohan performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer