Cargando…
Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer
The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30721923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008 |
_version_ | 1783547357312319488 |
---|---|
author | Cirenajwis, Helena Lauss, Martin Planck, Maria Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf, Johan |
author_facet | Cirenajwis, Helena Lauss, Martin Planck, Maria Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf, Johan |
author_sort | Cirenajwis, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different preprocessing needs like normalization and data centering. In response, a new breed of classifiers, single sample predictors (SSPs), has emerged. SSPs classify samples in an N-of-1 fashion, relying on, e.g. gene rules comparing expression values within a sample. To date, several methods have been reported, but there is a lack of head-to-head performance comparison for typical cancer classification problems, representing an unmet methodological need in cancer bioinformatics. To resolve this need, we performed an evaluation of two SSPs [k-top-scoring pair classifier (kTSP) and absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS)] for two case examples of different magnitude of difficulty in non-small cell lung cancer: gene expression–based classification of (i) tumor histology and (ii) molecular subtype. Through the analysis of ~2000 lung cancer samples for each case example (n = 1918 and n = 2106, respectively), we compared the performance of the methods for different sample compositions, training data set sizes, gene expression platforms and gene rule selections. Three main conclusions are drawn from the comparisons: both methods are platform independent, they select largely overlapping gene rules associated with actual underlying tumor biology and, for large training data sets, they behave interchangeably performance-wise. While SSPs like AIMS and kTSP offer new possibilities to move gene expression signatures/predictors closer to a clinical context, they are still importantly limited by the difficultness of the classification problem at hand. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7299291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72992912020-06-22 Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer Cirenajwis, Helena Lauss, Martin Planck, Maria Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf, Johan Brief Bioinform Case Study The development of multigene classifiers for cancer prognosis, treatment prediction, molecular subtypes or clinicopathological groups has been a cornerstone in transcriptomic analyses of human malignancies for nearly two decades. However, many reported classifiers are critically limited by different preprocessing needs like normalization and data centering. In response, a new breed of classifiers, single sample predictors (SSPs), has emerged. SSPs classify samples in an N-of-1 fashion, relying on, e.g. gene rules comparing expression values within a sample. To date, several methods have been reported, but there is a lack of head-to-head performance comparison for typical cancer classification problems, representing an unmet methodological need in cancer bioinformatics. To resolve this need, we performed an evaluation of two SSPs [k-top-scoring pair classifier (kTSP) and absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping (AIMS)] for two case examples of different magnitude of difficulty in non-small cell lung cancer: gene expression–based classification of (i) tumor histology and (ii) molecular subtype. Through the analysis of ~2000 lung cancer samples for each case example (n = 1918 and n = 2106, respectively), we compared the performance of the methods for different sample compositions, training data set sizes, gene expression platforms and gene rule selections. Three main conclusions are drawn from the comparisons: both methods are platform independent, they select largely overlapping gene rules associated with actual underlying tumor biology and, for large training data sets, they behave interchangeably performance-wise. While SSPs like AIMS and kTSP offer new possibilities to move gene expression signatures/predictors closer to a clinical context, they are still importantly limited by the difficultness of the classification problem at hand. Oxford University Press 2019-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7299291/ /pubmed/30721923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Study Cirenajwis, Helena Lauss, Martin Planck, Maria Vallon-Christersson, Johan Staaf, Johan Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title | Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full | Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title_short | Performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | performance of gene expression–based single sample predictors for assessment of clinicopathological subgroups and molecular subtypes in cancers: a case comparison study in non-small cell lung cancer |
topic | Case Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30721923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cirenajwishelena performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT laussmartin performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT planckmaria performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT vallonchristerssonjohan performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer AT staafjohan performanceofgeneexpressionbasedsinglesamplepredictorsforassessmentofclinicopathologicalsubgroupsandmolecularsubtypesincancersacasecomparisonstudyinnonsmallcelllungcancer |