Cargando…

Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing

Background: Clinical complications of long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation cause significant morbidity and have a substantial economic impact on the healthcare system. Objective: To assess the cost-benefit by implementing patient self-testing (PST) in German patients antico...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diel, Roland, Lampenius, Niklas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685587
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9774
_version_ 1783547387900329984
author Diel, Roland
Lampenius, Niklas
author_facet Diel, Roland
Lampenius, Niklas
author_sort Diel, Roland
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical complications of long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation cause significant morbidity and have a substantial economic impact on the healthcare system. Objective: To assess the cost-benefit by implementing patient self-testing (PST) in German patients anticoagulated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) compared to treatment with the new oral anticoagulant drugs (NOAC) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Methods: A deterministic decision-analytic model was developed simulating the number of major bleedings, ischemic strokes, and hemorrhagic strokes and their associated costs by utilizing PST compared to those of treatment with NOAC. Data on the rates of these adverse events in both groups during the 1st year of treatment was taken from the NOAC approval studies. Direct costs were evaluated from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) considering the use of resources directly related to PST testing and costs incurred by hospital treatment of the adverse events. Univariate sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the extent to which our calculations were affected by varying the parameters considered in our model within plausible extremes. To capture the interactions between multiple inputs, we also provided a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Results: When achieving an average time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 78%, implementing PST in VKA patients reduces cost per patient compared to NOAC treatment between €603.38 [USD 681.52] (edoxaban) and €762.64 [USD 861.40] (rivaroxaban) during the 1-year observation period. In line with the TTR increase, the initially higher number of adverse events per VKA patient compared to NOAC-treated patients in the approval studies becomes largely aligned; the difference in associated hospital costs per patient in the NOAC groups is then only €1.03 [USD 1.16] (in favor of dabigatran), €23.41 [USD 26.44] (in favor of apixaban), €0.53 [USD 0.60] (in favor of edoxaban) and €52.62 [USD 59.43] (in favor of VKA anticoagulation in the rivaroxaban group). In PSA, implementation of self-management results on average in a cost saving between €619.20 [USD 699.39] and €785.24 [USD 886.93] per VKA patient in favor of the SHI. Under all reasonable assumptions, PST remains constantly less expensive irrespective of which NOAC is administered. Conclusion: Implementing PST in German VKA patients may significantly reduce SHI expenditures compared to utilizing NOAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299443
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72994432020-07-16 Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing Diel, Roland Lampenius, Niklas J Health Econ Outcomes Res Cardiovascular Conditions Background: Clinical complications of long-term anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation cause significant morbidity and have a substantial economic impact on the healthcare system. Objective: To assess the cost-benefit by implementing patient self-testing (PST) in German patients anticoagulated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) compared to treatment with the new oral anticoagulant drugs (NOAC) apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Methods: A deterministic decision-analytic model was developed simulating the number of major bleedings, ischemic strokes, and hemorrhagic strokes and their associated costs by utilizing PST compared to those of treatment with NOAC. Data on the rates of these adverse events in both groups during the 1st year of treatment was taken from the NOAC approval studies. Direct costs were evaluated from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) considering the use of resources directly related to PST testing and costs incurred by hospital treatment of the adverse events. Univariate sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the extent to which our calculations were affected by varying the parameters considered in our model within plausible extremes. To capture the interactions between multiple inputs, we also provided a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Results: When achieving an average time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 78%, implementing PST in VKA patients reduces cost per patient compared to NOAC treatment between €603.38 [USD 681.52] (edoxaban) and €762.64 [USD 861.40] (rivaroxaban) during the 1-year observation period. In line with the TTR increase, the initially higher number of adverse events per VKA patient compared to NOAC-treated patients in the approval studies becomes largely aligned; the difference in associated hospital costs per patient in the NOAC groups is then only €1.03 [USD 1.16] (in favor of dabigatran), €23.41 [USD 26.44] (in favor of apixaban), €0.53 [USD 0.60] (in favor of edoxaban) and €52.62 [USD 59.43] (in favor of VKA anticoagulation in the rivaroxaban group). In PSA, implementation of self-management results on average in a cost saving between €619.20 [USD 699.39] and €785.24 [USD 886.93] per VKA patient in favor of the SHI. Under all reasonable assumptions, PST remains constantly less expensive irrespective of which NOAC is administered. Conclusion: Implementing PST in German VKA patients may significantly reduce SHI expenditures compared to utilizing NOAC. Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2019-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7299443/ /pubmed/32685587 http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9774 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Conditions
Diel, Roland
Lampenius, Niklas
Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title_full Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title_fullStr Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title_full_unstemmed Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title_short Cost-benefit analysis of VKA versus NOAC treatment in German patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
title_sort cost-benefit analysis of vka versus noac treatment in german patients with atrial fibrillation utilizing patient self-testing
topic Cardiovascular Conditions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299443/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685587
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9774
work_keys_str_mv AT dielroland costbenefitanalysisofvkaversusnoactreatmentingermanpatientswithatrialfibrillationutilizingpatientselftesting
AT lampeniusniklas costbenefitanalysisofvkaversusnoactreatmentingermanpatientswithatrialfibrillationutilizingpatientselftesting