Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison

OBJECTIVE: To compare improvement in pain and physical function for patients treated with baricitinib, adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapy from randomised, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled trials in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)/biologic (bDMARD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fautrel, B, Zhu, B, Taylor, P C, van de Laar, M, Emery, P, De Leonardis, F, Kannowski, C L, Nicolay, C, Kadziola, Z, De La Torre, I, Fleischmann, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001131
_version_ 1783547405010993152
author Fautrel, B
Zhu, B
Taylor, P C
van de Laar, M
Emery, P
De Leonardis, F
Kannowski, C L
Nicolay, C
Kadziola, Z
De La Torre, I
Fleischmann, R
author_facet Fautrel, B
Zhu, B
Taylor, P C
van de Laar, M
Emery, P
De Leonardis, F
Kannowski, C L
Nicolay, C
Kadziola, Z
De La Torre, I
Fleischmann, R
author_sort Fautrel, B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare improvement in pain and physical function for patients treated with baricitinib, adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapy from randomised, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled trials in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)/biologic (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs). METHODS: Data were from Phase III trials on patients receiving monotherapy baricitinib, tocilizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or MTX. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) and physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). An MAIC based on treatment-arm matching, an MAIC with study-level matching and Bucher’s method without matching compared change in outcomes between therapies. Matching variables included age, gender, baseline disease activity and baseline value of outcome measure. RESULTS: With all methods, greater improvements were observed in pain and HAQ-DI at 6 months for baricitinib compared with adalimumab and tocilizumab (p<0.05). Differences in treatment effects (TEs) favouring baricitinib for pain VAS for treatment-arm matching, study-level matching and Bucher’s method, respectively, were −12, −12 and −12 for baricitinib versus adalimumab and −7, −7 and −9 for baricitinib versus tocilizumab; the difference in TEs for HAQ-DI was −0.28, −0.28 and −0.30 for adalimumab and −0.23, −0.23 and −0.26 for tocilizumab. For baricitinib versus tofacitinib, no statistically significant differences for pain improvement were observed except with one of the three methods (Bucher method) and none for HAQ-DI. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest greater pain reduction and improved physical function for baricitinib monotherapy compared with tocilizumab and adalimumab monotherapy. No statistically significant differences in pain reduction and improved physical function were observed between baricitinib and tofacitinib with the MAIC analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72995192020-06-22 Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison Fautrel, B Zhu, B Taylor, P C van de Laar, M Emery, P De Leonardis, F Kannowski, C L Nicolay, C Kadziola, Z De La Torre, I Fleischmann, R RMD Open Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: To compare improvement in pain and physical function for patients treated with baricitinib, adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapy from randomised, methotrexate (MTX)-controlled trials in conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)/biologic (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs). METHODS: Data were from Phase III trials on patients receiving monotherapy baricitinib, tocilizumab, adalimumab, tofacitinib or MTX. Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (0–100 mm) and physical function using the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). An MAIC based on treatment-arm matching, an MAIC with study-level matching and Bucher’s method without matching compared change in outcomes between therapies. Matching variables included age, gender, baseline disease activity and baseline value of outcome measure. RESULTS: With all methods, greater improvements were observed in pain and HAQ-DI at 6 months for baricitinib compared with adalimumab and tocilizumab (p<0.05). Differences in treatment effects (TEs) favouring baricitinib for pain VAS for treatment-arm matching, study-level matching and Bucher’s method, respectively, were −12, −12 and −12 for baricitinib versus adalimumab and −7, −7 and −9 for baricitinib versus tocilizumab; the difference in TEs for HAQ-DI was −0.28, −0.28 and −0.30 for adalimumab and −0.23, −0.23 and −0.26 for tocilizumab. For baricitinib versus tofacitinib, no statistically significant differences for pain improvement were observed except with one of the three methods (Bucher method) and none for HAQ-DI. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest greater pain reduction and improved physical function for baricitinib monotherapy compared with tocilizumab and adalimumab monotherapy. No statistically significant differences in pain reduction and improved physical function were observed between baricitinib and tofacitinib with the MAIC analyses. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7299519/ /pubmed/32371431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001131 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rheumatoid Arthritis
Fautrel, B
Zhu, B
Taylor, P C
van de Laar, M
Emery, P
De Leonardis, F
Kannowski, C L
Nicolay, C
Kadziola, Z
De La Torre, I
Fleischmann, R
Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title_full Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title_short Comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title_sort comparative effectiveness of improvement in pain and physical function for baricitinib versus adalimumab, tocilizumab and tofacitinib monotherapies in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are naïve to treatment with biologic or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison
topic Rheumatoid Arthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32371431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001131
work_keys_str_mv AT fautrelb comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT zhub comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT taylorpc comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT vandelaarm comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT emeryp comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT deleonardisf comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT kannowskicl comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT nicolayc comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT kadziolaz comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT delatorrei comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc
AT fleischmannr comparativeeffectivenessofimprovementinpainandphysicalfunctionforbaricitinibversusadalimumabtocilizumabandtofacitinibmonotherapiesinrheumatoidarthritispatientswhoarenaivetotreatmentwithbiologicorconventionalsyntheticdiseasemodifyingantirheumaticdrugsamatc