Cargando…

The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand

PURPOSE: Pertaining to the Colorectal Surgery Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) Executive and Research Support Committee, this study aimed to assess the usefulness and outcomes of surveys sent out by the society to its members. METHODS: From 2009 to 2017, CSSANZ members received 38 surve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus, Lin, Amelia Alice, Young, Christopher John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Coloproctology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.17
_version_ 1783547413253849088
author Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus
Lin, Amelia Alice
Young, Christopher John
author_facet Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus
Lin, Amelia Alice
Young, Christopher John
author_sort Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pertaining to the Colorectal Surgery Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) Executive and Research Support Committee, this study aimed to assess the usefulness and outcomes of surveys sent out by the society to its members. METHODS: From 2009 to 2017, CSSANZ members received 38 surveys, most of which were distributed from within the society, and a few of which originated from other affiliated groups. Surveys were categorised by type, topics, times required for completion, delivery method, response rates, and advancement to publication. RESULTS: Of 38 surveys, 20 (53%) were published and 18 remain unpublished. Four surveys were distributed annually on average, with 2.2 published annually on average, with a mean impact factor of 2.41 ± 1.55. Mean time to publication was 31 ± 17 months. Surveys contributed to 13 publications (34%). The most common survey topics were rectal cancer decisionmaking, in 6 publications (16%), preoperative assessment of colorectal patients, in 5 publications (13%), and anal physiology: continence and defaecation, in 4 publications (11%). Publication of surveys was not related to the number of surveys distributed per year, the number of questions per survey, or the time required by respondents to complete the surveys. CONCLUSION: Most of the CSSANZ-distributed surveys resulted in publications, and one third of the surveys contributed to higher degrees obtained by investigators. These surveys aid research into areas that are otherwise difficult to assess, often indicating areas for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72995682020-06-19 The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus Lin, Amelia Alice Young, Christopher John Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Pertaining to the Colorectal Surgery Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) Executive and Research Support Committee, this study aimed to assess the usefulness and outcomes of surveys sent out by the society to its members. METHODS: From 2009 to 2017, CSSANZ members received 38 surveys, most of which were distributed from within the society, and a few of which originated from other affiliated groups. Surveys were categorised by type, topics, times required for completion, delivery method, response rates, and advancement to publication. RESULTS: Of 38 surveys, 20 (53%) were published and 18 remain unpublished. Four surveys were distributed annually on average, with 2.2 published annually on average, with a mean impact factor of 2.41 ± 1.55. Mean time to publication was 31 ± 17 months. Surveys contributed to 13 publications (34%). The most common survey topics were rectal cancer decisionmaking, in 6 publications (16%), preoperative assessment of colorectal patients, in 5 publications (13%), and anal physiology: continence and defaecation, in 4 publications (11%). Publication of surveys was not related to the number of surveys distributed per year, the number of questions per survey, or the time required by respondents to complete the surveys. CONCLUSION: Most of the CSSANZ-distributed surveys resulted in publications, and one third of the surveys contributed to higher degrees obtained by investigators. These surveys aid research into areas that are otherwise difficult to assess, often indicating areas for future research. Korean Society of Coloproctology 2020-04 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7299568/ /pubmed/32429010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.17 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Coloproctology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ricardo Hamilton, Auerilius Erastus
Lin, Amelia Alice
Young, Christopher John
The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title_full The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title_fullStr The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title_short The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
title_sort benefits of colorectal surgery surveys in australia and new zealand
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.17
work_keys_str_mv AT ricardohamiltonaueriliuserastus thebenefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand
AT linameliaalice thebenefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand
AT youngchristopherjohn thebenefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand
AT ricardohamiltonaueriliuserastus benefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand
AT linameliaalice benefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand
AT youngchristopherjohn benefitsofcolorectalsurgerysurveysinaustraliaandnewzealand