Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study

AIM: An in vitro study to evaluate and compare the remineralization potential of commercially available remineralizing agents containing silver diamine fluoride (SDF), casein sucrose phosphate (CSP), casein phospho peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) using DIAGNOdent. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinod, Darshana, Gopalakrishnan, Anjana, Subramani, Saravanakumar M, Balachandran, Muralikrishnan, Manoharan, Vidya, Joy, Amrutha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581482
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1715
_version_ 1783547462479249408
author Vinod, Darshana
Gopalakrishnan, Anjana
Subramani, Saravanakumar M
Balachandran, Muralikrishnan
Manoharan, Vidya
Joy, Amrutha
author_facet Vinod, Darshana
Gopalakrishnan, Anjana
Subramani, Saravanakumar M
Balachandran, Muralikrishnan
Manoharan, Vidya
Joy, Amrutha
author_sort Vinod, Darshana
collection PubMed
description AIM: An in vitro study to evaluate and compare the remineralization potential of commercially available remineralizing agents containing silver diamine fluoride (SDF), casein sucrose phosphate (CSP), casein phospho peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) using DIAGNOdent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted premolars for orthodontic treatment were collected. Specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 each: group I: SDF, group II: CSP, group III: CPP-ACP. The samples were subjected to DIAGNOdent analysis for recording the baseline values. Specimens were placed in demineralizing solution incubated at 37°C for 72 hours. DIAGNOdent values were recorded after demineralization. Following this, remineralization procedure was carried out using 3 different remineralizing agents: group I samples with SDF, group II with CSP, and group III with CPP-ACP. The remineralization procedure was performed to group I once and repeated for 14 days for group II and group III and storage solution was changed every 24 hours. The samples were subjected to DIAGNOdent analysis after 72 hours, 7 days, and 14 days and values were recorded. RESULTS: The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc test. Intragroup comparison of DIAGNOdent readings showed a highly significant difference between baseline, postdemineralization, and postremineralization values. Among intergroup comparison, SDF showed maximum remineralization values followed by CSP and CPP-ACP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Silver diamine fluoride, CSP, and CPP-ACP are proven to possess remineralization potential. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A comparative evaluation of these three remineralizing agents will aid in identifying most potent and effective agent in treating initial caries lesions in an effective noninvasive and child-friendly manner. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Vinod D, Gopalakrishnan A, Subramani SM, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(1):61–65.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72998862020-06-23 A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study Vinod, Darshana Gopalakrishnan, Anjana Subramani, Saravanakumar M Balachandran, Muralikrishnan Manoharan, Vidya Joy, Amrutha Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: An in vitro study to evaluate and compare the remineralization potential of commercially available remineralizing agents containing silver diamine fluoride (SDF), casein sucrose phosphate (CSP), casein phospho peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) using DIAGNOdent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted premolars for orthodontic treatment were collected. Specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 10 each: group I: SDF, group II: CSP, group III: CPP-ACP. The samples were subjected to DIAGNOdent analysis for recording the baseline values. Specimens were placed in demineralizing solution incubated at 37°C for 72 hours. DIAGNOdent values were recorded after demineralization. Following this, remineralization procedure was carried out using 3 different remineralizing agents: group I samples with SDF, group II with CSP, and group III with CPP-ACP. The remineralization procedure was performed to group I once and repeated for 14 days for group II and group III and storage solution was changed every 24 hours. The samples were subjected to DIAGNOdent analysis after 72 hours, 7 days, and 14 days and values were recorded. RESULTS: The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc test. Intragroup comparison of DIAGNOdent readings showed a highly significant difference between baseline, postdemineralization, and postremineralization values. Among intergroup comparison, SDF showed maximum remineralization values followed by CSP and CPP-ACP, respectively. CONCLUSION: Silver diamine fluoride, CSP, and CPP-ACP are proven to possess remineralization potential. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A comparative evaluation of these three remineralizing agents will aid in identifying most potent and effective agent in treating initial caries lesions in an effective noninvasive and child-friendly manner. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Vinod D, Gopalakrishnan A, Subramani SM, et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2020;13(1):61–65. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7299886/ /pubmed/32581482 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1715 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vinod, Darshana
Gopalakrishnan, Anjana
Subramani, Saravanakumar M
Balachandran, Muralikrishnan
Manoharan, Vidya
Joy, Amrutha
A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Remineralizing Potential of Three Commercially Available Remineralizing Agents: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of remineralizing potential of three commercially available remineralizing agents: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32581482
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1715
work_keys_str_mv AT vinoddarshana acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT gopalakrishnananjana acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT subramanisaravanakumarm acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT balachandranmuralikrishnan acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT manoharanvidya acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT joyamrutha acomparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT vinoddarshana comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT gopalakrishnananjana comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT subramanisaravanakumarm comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT balachandranmuralikrishnan comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT manoharanvidya comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT joyamrutha comparativeevaluationofremineralizingpotentialofthreecommerciallyavailableremineralizingagentsaninvitrostudy