Cargando…
Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent m...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8 |
_version_ | 1783547468842008576 |
---|---|
author | Wisman, Arnaud Shrira, Ilan |
author_facet | Wisman, Arnaud Shrira, Ilan |
author_sort | Wisman, Arnaud |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent mini meta-analysis, support was found for the hypothesis that men can process the scent of sexually aroused women and that exposure to these sexual chemosignals affect the subsequent perceptions and sexual motivation of men. Specifically, Experiment 1 revealed that men evaluate the axillary sweat of sexually aroused women as more attractive, compared to the scent of the same women when not sexually aroused. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that exposure to sexual chemosignals increased the men’s sexual arousal. Experiment 3 found support for the thesis that exposure to sexual chemosignals would increase sexual motivation. As predicted, men devoted greater attention to and showed greater interest in mating with women who displayed sexual cues (e.g., scantily dressed, in seductive poses). By contrast, exposure to the sexual chemosignals did not alter males’ attention and mating interest toward women who displayed no sexual cues. It is discussed how sexual chemosignals may function as an additional channel in the communication of sexual interest and how contextual factors can influence the dynamics of human sexual communication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7299914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72999142020-06-19 Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal Wisman, Arnaud Shrira, Ilan Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent mini meta-analysis, support was found for the hypothesis that men can process the scent of sexually aroused women and that exposure to these sexual chemosignals affect the subsequent perceptions and sexual motivation of men. Specifically, Experiment 1 revealed that men evaluate the axillary sweat of sexually aroused women as more attractive, compared to the scent of the same women when not sexually aroused. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that exposure to sexual chemosignals increased the men’s sexual arousal. Experiment 3 found support for the thesis that exposure to sexual chemosignals would increase sexual motivation. As predicted, men devoted greater attention to and showed greater interest in mating with women who displayed sexual cues (e.g., scantily dressed, in seductive poses). By contrast, exposure to the sexual chemosignals did not alter males’ attention and mating interest toward women who displayed no sexual cues. It is discussed how sexual chemosignals may function as an additional channel in the communication of sexual interest and how contextual factors can influence the dynamics of human sexual communication. Springer US 2020-02-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7299914/ /pubmed/32026223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Wisman, Arnaud Shrira, Ilan Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title | Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title_full | Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title_fullStr | Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title_full_unstemmed | Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title_short | Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal |
title_sort | sexual chemosignals: evidence that men process olfactory signals of women’s sexual arousal |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wismanarnaud sexualchemosignalsevidencethatmenprocessolfactorysignalsofwomenssexualarousal AT shrirailan sexualchemosignalsevidencethatmenprocessolfactorysignalsofwomenssexualarousal |