Cargando…

Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal

Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wisman, Arnaud, Shrira, Ilan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8
_version_ 1783547468842008576
author Wisman, Arnaud
Shrira, Ilan
author_facet Wisman, Arnaud
Shrira, Ilan
author_sort Wisman, Arnaud
collection PubMed
description Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent mini meta-analysis, support was found for the hypothesis that men can process the scent of sexually aroused women and that exposure to these sexual chemosignals affect the subsequent perceptions and sexual motivation of men. Specifically, Experiment 1 revealed that men evaluate the axillary sweat of sexually aroused women as more attractive, compared to the scent of the same women when not sexually aroused. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that exposure to sexual chemosignals increased the men’s sexual arousal. Experiment 3 found support for the thesis that exposure to sexual chemosignals would increase sexual motivation. As predicted, men devoted greater attention to and showed greater interest in mating with women who displayed sexual cues (e.g., scantily dressed, in seductive poses). By contrast, exposure to the sexual chemosignals did not alter males’ attention and mating interest toward women who displayed no sexual cues. It is discussed how sexual chemosignals may function as an additional channel in the communication of sexual interest and how contextual factors can influence the dynamics of human sexual communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7299914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72999142020-06-19 Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal Wisman, Arnaud Shrira, Ilan Arch Sex Behav Original Paper Research suggests that humans can communicate emotional states (e.g., fear, sadness) via chemosignals. However, thus far little is known about whether sexual arousal can also be conveyed through chemosignals and how these signals might influence the receiver. In three experiments, and a subsequent mini meta-analysis, support was found for the hypothesis that men can process the scent of sexually aroused women and that exposure to these sexual chemosignals affect the subsequent perceptions and sexual motivation of men. Specifically, Experiment 1 revealed that men evaluate the axillary sweat of sexually aroused women as more attractive, compared to the scent of the same women when not sexually aroused. In addition, Experiment 2 showed that exposure to sexual chemosignals increased the men’s sexual arousal. Experiment 3 found support for the thesis that exposure to sexual chemosignals would increase sexual motivation. As predicted, men devoted greater attention to and showed greater interest in mating with women who displayed sexual cues (e.g., scantily dressed, in seductive poses). By contrast, exposure to the sexual chemosignals did not alter males’ attention and mating interest toward women who displayed no sexual cues. It is discussed how sexual chemosignals may function as an additional channel in the communication of sexual interest and how contextual factors can influence the dynamics of human sexual communication. Springer US 2020-02-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7299914/ /pubmed/32026223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Wisman, Arnaud
Shrira, Ilan
Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title_full Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title_fullStr Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title_full_unstemmed Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title_short Sexual Chemosignals: Evidence that Men Process Olfactory Signals of Women’s Sexual Arousal
title_sort sexual chemosignals: evidence that men process olfactory signals of women’s sexual arousal
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7299914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32026223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01588-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wismanarnaud sexualchemosignalsevidencethatmenprocessolfactorysignalsofwomenssexualarousal
AT shrirailan sexualchemosignalsevidencethatmenprocessolfactorysignalsofwomenssexualarousal