Cargando…

Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nosworthy, Matthew G., Medina, Gerardo, Franczyk, Adam J., Neufeld, Jason, Appah, Paulyn, Utioh, Alphonsus, Frohlich, Peter, Tar'an, Bunyamin, House, James D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1597
_version_ 1783547501275512832
author Nosworthy, Matthew G.
Medina, Gerardo
Franczyk, Adam J.
Neufeld, Jason
Appah, Paulyn
Utioh, Alphonsus
Frohlich, Peter
Tar'an, Bunyamin
House, James D.
author_facet Nosworthy, Matthew G.
Medina, Gerardo
Franczyk, Adam J.
Neufeld, Jason
Appah, Paulyn
Utioh, Alphonsus
Frohlich, Peter
Tar'an, Bunyamin
House, James D.
author_sort Nosworthy, Matthew G.
collection PubMed
description Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determined using in vivo and in vitro analyses for processed chickpeas. Processing differentially affected the protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of chickpeas with extruded chickpea (83.8) having a higher PDCAAS score than both cooked (75.2) and baked (80.03). Interestingly, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) value of baked chickpea (0.84) was higher compared to both extruded (0.82) and cooked (0.78). The protein efficiency ratio, another measure of protein quality, was significantly higher for extruded chickpea than baked chickpea (p < .01). In vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality were well correlated (R (2) = .9339). These results demonstrated that under certain circumstances in vitro methods could replace the use of animals to determine protein quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7300037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73000372020-06-18 Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Nosworthy, Matthew G. Medina, Gerardo Franczyk, Adam J. Neufeld, Jason Appah, Paulyn Utioh, Alphonsus Frohlich, Peter Tar'an, Bunyamin House, James D. Food Sci Nutr Original Research Chickpea is a widely produced pulse crop, but requires processing prior to human consumption. Protein bioavailability and amino acid quantity of chickpea flour can be altered by multiple factors including processing method. For this reason, the protein quality of processed chickpea flour was determined using in vivo and in vitro analyses for processed chickpeas. Processing differentially affected the protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) of chickpeas with extruded chickpea (83.8) having a higher PDCAAS score than both cooked (75.2) and baked (80.03). Interestingly, the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) value of baked chickpea (0.84) was higher compared to both extruded (0.82) and cooked (0.78). The protein efficiency ratio, another measure of protein quality, was significantly higher for extruded chickpea than baked chickpea (p < .01). In vivo and in vitro analysis of protein quality were well correlated (R (2) = .9339). These results demonstrated that under certain circumstances in vitro methods could replace the use of animals to determine protein quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7300037/ /pubmed/32566213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1597 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Nosworthy, Matthew G.
Medina, Gerardo
Franczyk, Adam J.
Neufeld, Jason
Appah, Paulyn
Utioh, Alphonsus
Frohlich, Peter
Tar'an, Bunyamin
House, James D.
Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title_full Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title_fullStr Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title_full_unstemmed Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title_short Thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)
title_sort thermal processing methods differentially affect the protein quality of chickpea (cicer arietinum)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1597
work_keys_str_mv AT nosworthymatthewg thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT medinagerardo thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT franczykadamj thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT neufeldjason thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT appahpaulyn thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT utiohalphonsus thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT frohlichpeter thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT taranbunyamin thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum
AT housejamesd thermalprocessingmethodsdifferentiallyaffecttheproteinqualityofchickpeacicerarietinum