Cargando…

New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled

The classic domestication scenario for grains and fruits has been portrayed as the lucky fixation of major-effect “domestication genes.” Characterization of these genes plus recent improvements in generating novel alleles (e.g., by gene editing) have created great interest in de novo domestication o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Tassel, David L., Tesdell, Omar, Schlautman, Brandon, Rubin, Matthew J., DeHaan, Lee R., Crews, Timothy E., Streit Krug, Aubrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00789
_version_ 1783547548766568448
author Van Tassel, David L.
Tesdell, Omar
Schlautman, Brandon
Rubin, Matthew J.
DeHaan, Lee R.
Crews, Timothy E.
Streit Krug, Aubrey
author_facet Van Tassel, David L.
Tesdell, Omar
Schlautman, Brandon
Rubin, Matthew J.
DeHaan, Lee R.
Crews, Timothy E.
Streit Krug, Aubrey
author_sort Van Tassel, David L.
collection PubMed
description The classic domestication scenario for grains and fruits has been portrayed as the lucky fixation of major-effect “domestication genes.” Characterization of these genes plus recent improvements in generating novel alleles (e.g., by gene editing) have created great interest in de novo domestication of new crops from wild species. While new gene editing technologies may accelerate some genetic aspects of domestication, we caution that de novo domestication should be understood as an iterative process rather than a singular event. Changes in human social preferences and relationships and ongoing agronomic innovation, along with broad genetic changes, may be foundational. Allele frequency changes at many loci controlling quantitative traits not normally included in the domestication syndrome may be required to achieve sufficient yield, quality, defense, and broad adaptation. The environments, practices and tools developed and maintained by farmers and researchers over generations contribute to crop yield and success, yet those may not be appropriate for new crops without a history of agronomy. New crops must compete with crops that benefit from long-standing participation in human cultural evolution; adoption of new crops may require accelerating the evolution of new crops’ culinary and cultural significance, the emergence of markets and trade, and the formation and support of agricultural and scholarly institutions. We provide a practical framework that highlights and integrates these genetic, agronomic, and cultural drivers of change to conceptualize de novo domestication for communities of new crop domesticators, growers and consumers. Major gene-focused domestication may be valuable in creating allele variants that are critical to domestication but will not alone result in widespread and ongoing cultivation of new crops. Gene editing does not bypass or diminish the need for classical breeding, ethnobotanical and horticultural knowledge, local agronomy and crop protection research and extension, farmer participation, and social and cultural research and outreach. To realize the ecological and social benefits that a new era of de novo domestication could offer, we call on funding agencies, proposal reviewers and authors, and research communities to value and support these disciplines and approaches as essential to the success of the breakthroughs that are expected from gene editing techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7300247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73002472020-06-26 New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled Van Tassel, David L. Tesdell, Omar Schlautman, Brandon Rubin, Matthew J. DeHaan, Lee R. Crews, Timothy E. Streit Krug, Aubrey Front Plant Sci Plant Science The classic domestication scenario for grains and fruits has been portrayed as the lucky fixation of major-effect “domestication genes.” Characterization of these genes plus recent improvements in generating novel alleles (e.g., by gene editing) have created great interest in de novo domestication of new crops from wild species. While new gene editing technologies may accelerate some genetic aspects of domestication, we caution that de novo domestication should be understood as an iterative process rather than a singular event. Changes in human social preferences and relationships and ongoing agronomic innovation, along with broad genetic changes, may be foundational. Allele frequency changes at many loci controlling quantitative traits not normally included in the domestication syndrome may be required to achieve sufficient yield, quality, defense, and broad adaptation. The environments, practices and tools developed and maintained by farmers and researchers over generations contribute to crop yield and success, yet those may not be appropriate for new crops without a history of agronomy. New crops must compete with crops that benefit from long-standing participation in human cultural evolution; adoption of new crops may require accelerating the evolution of new crops’ culinary and cultural significance, the emergence of markets and trade, and the formation and support of agricultural and scholarly institutions. We provide a practical framework that highlights and integrates these genetic, agronomic, and cultural drivers of change to conceptualize de novo domestication for communities of new crop domesticators, growers and consumers. Major gene-focused domestication may be valuable in creating allele variants that are critical to domestication but will not alone result in widespread and ongoing cultivation of new crops. Gene editing does not bypass or diminish the need for classical breeding, ethnobotanical and horticultural knowledge, local agronomy and crop protection research and extension, farmer participation, and social and cultural research and outreach. To realize the ecological and social benefits that a new era of de novo domestication could offer, we call on funding agencies, proposal reviewers and authors, and research communities to value and support these disciplines and approaches as essential to the success of the breakthroughs that are expected from gene editing techniques. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7300247/ /pubmed/32595676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00789 Text en Copyright © 2020 Van Tassel, Tesdell, Schlautman, Rubin, DeHaan, Crews and Streit Krug. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Van Tassel, David L.
Tesdell, Omar
Schlautman, Brandon
Rubin, Matthew J.
DeHaan, Lee R.
Crews, Timothy E.
Streit Krug, Aubrey
New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title_full New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title_fullStr New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title_full_unstemmed New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title_short New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled
title_sort new food crop domestication in the age of gene editing: genetic, agronomic and cultural change remain co-evolutionarily entangled
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00789
work_keys_str_mv AT vantasseldavidl newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT tesdellomar newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT schlautmanbrandon newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT rubinmatthewj newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT dehaanleer newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT crewstimothye newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled
AT streitkrugaubrey newfoodcropdomesticationintheageofgeneeditinggeneticagronomicandculturalchangeremaincoevolutionarilyentangled