Cargando…

How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)

The frequency of patients who switch to a second‐line therapy from a frontline second‐generation (2gen) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as dasatinib and nilotinib, is still substantially unknown. We retrospectively investigated a large series of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML) p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breccia, Massimo, Olimpieri, Pier Paolo, Olimpieri, Odoardo, Pane, Fabrizio, Iurlo, Alessandra, Foggi, Paolo, Cirilli, Alessia, Colatrella, Antonietta, Cuomo, Marcello, Gozzo, Lucia, Summa, Valentina, Corradini, Paolo, Russo, Pierluigi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3071
_version_ 1783547583750209536
author Breccia, Massimo
Olimpieri, Pier Paolo
Olimpieri, Odoardo
Pane, Fabrizio
Iurlo, Alessandra
Foggi, Paolo
Cirilli, Alessia
Colatrella, Antonietta
Cuomo, Marcello
Gozzo, Lucia
Summa, Valentina
Corradini, Paolo
Russo, Pierluigi
author_facet Breccia, Massimo
Olimpieri, Pier Paolo
Olimpieri, Odoardo
Pane, Fabrizio
Iurlo, Alessandra
Foggi, Paolo
Cirilli, Alessia
Colatrella, Antonietta
Cuomo, Marcello
Gozzo, Lucia
Summa, Valentina
Corradini, Paolo
Russo, Pierluigi
author_sort Breccia, Massimo
collection PubMed
description The frequency of patients who switch to a second‐line therapy from a frontline second‐generation (2gen) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as dasatinib and nilotinib, is still substantially unknown. We retrospectively investigated a large series of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML) patients initially treated with 2gen TKIs monitored through the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA Agenzia Italiana del farmaco) registries. Overall, 2420 patients were analyzed over a period of 6 years. One hundred and fifty‐seven patients (16.3%) treated with dasatinib and 164 treated with nilotinib (11.3%) have switched to another drug, with an overall frequency of 13.2%. In the dasatinib cohort, 39.4% of patients changed treatment for failure and 36.3% for intolerance as compared to 45.7% and 27.4% respectively in the nilotinib cohort. Overall, the median time to switch due to resistance was 293 days, whereas it was 317 days in case of intolerance. Resistance was observed mainly in younger male patients with high‐risk features, while intolerance was not related to any baseline parameter. After resistance/intolerance to nilotinib, the majority of patients switched to dasatinib (53.8%) whereas in case of frontline dasatinib to ponatinib (43.2%). To the best of our knowledge these data provide the first report on the frequency of discontinuation of frontline 2gen TKIs and on the main causes and pattern of choice to a second‐line therapy in the real‐life setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7300412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73004122020-06-18 How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA) Breccia, Massimo Olimpieri, Pier Paolo Olimpieri, Odoardo Pane, Fabrizio Iurlo, Alessandra Foggi, Paolo Cirilli, Alessia Colatrella, Antonietta Cuomo, Marcello Gozzo, Lucia Summa, Valentina Corradini, Paolo Russo, Pierluigi Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research The frequency of patients who switch to a second‐line therapy from a frontline second‐generation (2gen) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as dasatinib and nilotinib, is still substantially unknown. We retrospectively investigated a large series of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML) patients initially treated with 2gen TKIs monitored through the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA Agenzia Italiana del farmaco) registries. Overall, 2420 patients were analyzed over a period of 6 years. One hundred and fifty‐seven patients (16.3%) treated with dasatinib and 164 treated with nilotinib (11.3%) have switched to another drug, with an overall frequency of 13.2%. In the dasatinib cohort, 39.4% of patients changed treatment for failure and 36.3% for intolerance as compared to 45.7% and 27.4% respectively in the nilotinib cohort. Overall, the median time to switch due to resistance was 293 days, whereas it was 317 days in case of intolerance. Resistance was observed mainly in younger male patients with high‐risk features, while intolerance was not related to any baseline parameter. After resistance/intolerance to nilotinib, the majority of patients switched to dasatinib (53.8%) whereas in case of frontline dasatinib to ponatinib (43.2%). To the best of our knowledge these data provide the first report on the frequency of discontinuation of frontline 2gen TKIs and on the main causes and pattern of choice to a second‐line therapy in the real‐life setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7300412/ /pubmed/32319737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3071 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Breccia, Massimo
Olimpieri, Pier Paolo
Olimpieri, Odoardo
Pane, Fabrizio
Iurlo, Alessandra
Foggi, Paolo
Cirilli, Alessia
Colatrella, Antonietta
Cuomo, Marcello
Gozzo, Lucia
Summa, Valentina
Corradini, Paolo
Russo, Pierluigi
How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title_full How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title_fullStr How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title_full_unstemmed How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title_short How many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? A retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (AIFA)
title_sort how many chronic myeloid leukemia patients who started a frontline second‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor have to switch to a second‐line treatment? a retrospective analysis from the monitoring registries of the italian medicines agency (aifa)
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7300412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3071
work_keys_str_mv AT brecciamassimo howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT olimpieripierpaolo howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT olimpieriodoardo howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT panefabrizio howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT iurloalessandra howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT foggipaolo howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT cirillialessia howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT colatrellaantonietta howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT cuomomarcello howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT gozzolucia howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT summavalentina howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT corradinipaolo howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT russopierluigi howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa
AT howmanychronicmyeloidleukemiapatientswhostartedafrontlinesecondgenerationtyrosinekinaseinhibitorhavetoswitchtoasecondlinetreatmentaretrospectiveanalysisfromthemonitoringregistriesoftheitalianmedicinesagencyaifa