Cargando…

Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays

INTRODUCTION: The United Kingdom (UK) has experienced one of the worst initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical signs help guide initial diagnosis, though definitive diagnosis is made using the laboratory technique reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The chest x-ray (CX...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stevens, Barry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32591286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.010
_version_ 1783547617659060224
author Stevens, Barry J.
author_facet Stevens, Barry J.
author_sort Stevens, Barry J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The United Kingdom (UK) has experienced one of the worst initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical signs help guide initial diagnosis, though definitive diagnosis is made using the laboratory technique reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The chest x-ray (CXR) is used as the primary imaging investigation in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with suspected COVID-19. In some hospitals these CXRs may be reported by a radiographer. METHODS: Retrospective review of CXR reports by radiographers for suspected COVID-19 patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) of a hospital in the UK. Interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) coding system was assessed. Report description and code use were cross-checked. Report and code usage were checked against the RT-PCR result to determine accuracy. Report availability was checked against the availability of the RT-PCR result. A confusion matrix was utilised to determine performance. The data were analysed manually using Excel. RESULTS: Sample size was 320 patients; 54.1% male patients (n = 173), 45.9% female patients (n = 147). The correct code matched report descriptions in 316 of the 320 cases (98.8%). In 299 of the 320 cases (93.4%), the reports were available before the RT-PCR swab result. CXR sensitivity for detecting COVID-19 was 85% compared to 93% for the initial RT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Reporting radiographers can adequately utilise and apply the BSTI classification system when reporting COVID-19 CXRs. They can recognise the classic CXR appearances of COVID-19 and those with normal appearances. Future best practice includes checking laboratory results when reporting CXRs with ambiguous appearances. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Utilisation of reporting radiographers to report CXRs in any future respiratory pandemic should be considered a service-enabling development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73010772020-06-18 Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays Stevens, Barry J. Radiography (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: The United Kingdom (UK) has experienced one of the worst initial waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical signs help guide initial diagnosis, though definitive diagnosis is made using the laboratory technique reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The chest x-ray (CXR) is used as the primary imaging investigation in the United Kingdom (UK) for patients with suspected COVID-19. In some hospitals these CXRs may be reported by a radiographer. METHODS: Retrospective review of CXR reports by radiographers for suspected COVID-19 patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) of a hospital in the UK. Interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) coding system was assessed. Report description and code use were cross-checked. Report and code usage were checked against the RT-PCR result to determine accuracy. Report availability was checked against the availability of the RT-PCR result. A confusion matrix was utilised to determine performance. The data were analysed manually using Excel. RESULTS: Sample size was 320 patients; 54.1% male patients (n = 173), 45.9% female patients (n = 147). The correct code matched report descriptions in 316 of the 320 cases (98.8%). In 299 of the 320 cases (93.4%), the reports were available before the RT-PCR swab result. CXR sensitivity for detecting COVID-19 was 85% compared to 93% for the initial RT-PCR. CONCLUSION: Reporting radiographers can adequately utilise and apply the BSTI classification system when reporting COVID-19 CXRs. They can recognise the classic CXR appearances of COVID-19 and those with normal appearances. Future best practice includes checking laboratory results when reporting CXRs with ambiguous appearances. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Utilisation of reporting radiographers to report CXRs in any future respiratory pandemic should be considered a service-enabling development. The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-02 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7301077/ /pubmed/32591286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.010 Text en © 2020 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Stevens, Barry J.
Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title_full Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title_fullStr Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title_full_unstemmed Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title_short Reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the British Society of Thoracic Imaging's coding system when reporting COVID-19 chest x-rays
title_sort reporting radiographers' interpretation and use of the british society of thoracic imaging's coding system when reporting covid-19 chest x-rays
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32591286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.06.010
work_keys_str_mv AT stevensbarryj reportingradiographersinterpretationanduseofthebritishsocietyofthoracicimagingscodingsystemwhenreportingcovid19chestxrays