Cargando…
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization
OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on imaging utilization across practice settings. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in the composition of inpatient imaging volumes for modality types and Current Procedural Terminology–coded g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American College of Radiology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32622817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.011 |
_version_ | 1783547630281818112 |
---|---|
author | Naidich, Jason J. Boltyenkov, Artem Wang, Jason J. Chusid, Jesse Hughes, Danny Sanelli, Pina C. |
author_facet | Naidich, Jason J. Boltyenkov, Artem Wang, Jason J. Chusid, Jesse Hughes, Danny Sanelli, Pina C. |
author_sort | Naidich, Jason J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on imaging utilization across practice settings. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in the composition of inpatient imaging volumes for modality types and Current Procedural Terminology–coded groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective study of inpatient imaging volumes in a large health care system was performed, analyzing weekly imaging volumes by modality types (radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine) in years 2020 and 2019. The data set was split to compare pre-COVID-19 (weeks 1-9) and post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-16) periods. Further subanalyses compared early post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-13) and late post-COVID-19 (weeks 14-16) periods. Statistical comparisons were performed using χ(2) and independent-samples t tests. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, total inpatient imaging volume in 2020 post-COVID-19, early and late post-COVID-19 periods, declined by 13.6% (from 78,902 to 68,168), 16.6% (from 45,221 to 37,732), and 9.6% (from 33,681 to 30,436), respectively. By week 16, inpatient imaging volume rebounded and was only down 4.2% (from 11,003 to 10,546). However, a statistically significant shift (P < .0001) in the 2020 composition mix was observed largely comprised of radiography (74.3%), followed by CT (12.7%), ultrasound (8%), MRI (2.4%), interventional radiology (2.3%), and nuclear medicine (0.4%). Although the vast majority of imaging studies declined, few Current Procedural Terminology–coded groups showed increased trends in imaging volumes in the late post-COVID-19 period, including CT angiography chest, radiography chest, and ultrasound venous duplex. DISCUSSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a decrease in inpatient imaging volumes accompanied by a shift away from cross-sectional imaging toward radiography. These findings could have significant implications in planning for a potential resurgence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7301132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American College of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73011322020-06-18 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization Naidich, Jason J. Boltyenkov, Artem Wang, Jason J. Chusid, Jesse Hughes, Danny Sanelli, Pina C. J Am Coll Radiol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on imaging utilization across practice settings. The purpose of this study was to quantify the change in the composition of inpatient imaging volumes for modality types and Current Procedural Terminology–coded groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective study of inpatient imaging volumes in a large health care system was performed, analyzing weekly imaging volumes by modality types (radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine) in years 2020 and 2019. The data set was split to compare pre-COVID-19 (weeks 1-9) and post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-16) periods. Further subanalyses compared early post-COVID-19 (weeks 10-13) and late post-COVID-19 (weeks 14-16) periods. Statistical comparisons were performed using χ(2) and independent-samples t tests. RESULTS: Compared with 2019, total inpatient imaging volume in 2020 post-COVID-19, early and late post-COVID-19 periods, declined by 13.6% (from 78,902 to 68,168), 16.6% (from 45,221 to 37,732), and 9.6% (from 33,681 to 30,436), respectively. By week 16, inpatient imaging volume rebounded and was only down 4.2% (from 11,003 to 10,546). However, a statistically significant shift (P < .0001) in the 2020 composition mix was observed largely comprised of radiography (74.3%), followed by CT (12.7%), ultrasound (8%), MRI (2.4%), interventional radiology (2.3%), and nuclear medicine (0.4%). Although the vast majority of imaging studies declined, few Current Procedural Terminology–coded groups showed increased trends in imaging volumes in the late post-COVID-19 period, including CT angiography chest, radiography chest, and ultrasound venous duplex. DISCUSSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a decrease in inpatient imaging volumes accompanied by a shift away from cross-sectional imaging toward radiography. These findings could have significant implications in planning for a potential resurgence. American College of Radiology 2020-10 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7301132/ /pubmed/32622817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.011 Text en © 2020 American College of Radiology. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Naidich, Jason J. Boltyenkov, Artem Wang, Jason J. Chusid, Jesse Hughes, Danny Sanelli, Pina C. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title_full | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title_fullStr | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title_full_unstemmed | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title_short | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Shifts Inpatient Imaging Utilization |
title_sort | coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic shifts inpatient imaging utilization |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32622817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.06.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naidichjasonj coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization AT boltyenkovartem coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization AT wangjasonj coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization AT chusidjesse coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization AT hughesdanny coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization AT sanellipinac coronavirusdisease2019covid19pandemicshiftsinpatientimagingutilization |