Cargando…

Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review in elderly people with polypharmacy. DESIGN: Pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 359 general practices in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. PARTIC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rieckert, Anja, Reeves, David, Altiner, Attila, Drewelow, Eva, Esmail, Aneez, Flamm, Maria, Hann, Mark, Johansson, Tim, Klaassen-Mielke, Renate, Kunnamo, Ilkka, Löffler, Christin, Piccoliori, Giuliano, Sommerauer, Christina, Trampisch, Ulrike S, Vögele, Anna, Woodham, Adrine, Sönnichsen, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1822
_version_ 1783547636154892288
author Rieckert, Anja
Reeves, David
Altiner, Attila
Drewelow, Eva
Esmail, Aneez
Flamm, Maria
Hann, Mark
Johansson, Tim
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Löffler, Christin
Piccoliori, Giuliano
Sommerauer, Christina
Trampisch, Ulrike S
Vögele, Anna
Woodham, Adrine
Sönnichsen, Andreas
author_facet Rieckert, Anja
Reeves, David
Altiner, Attila
Drewelow, Eva
Esmail, Aneez
Flamm, Maria
Hann, Mark
Johansson, Tim
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Löffler, Christin
Piccoliori, Giuliano
Sommerauer, Christina
Trampisch, Ulrike S
Vögele, Anna
Woodham, Adrine
Sönnichsen, Andreas
author_sort Rieckert, Anja
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review in elderly people with polypharmacy. DESIGN: Pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 359 general practices in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 3904 adults aged 75 years and older using eight or more drugs on a regular basis, recruited by their general practitioner. INTERVENTION: A newly developed electronic decision support tool comprising a comprehensive drug review to support general practitioners in deprescribing potentially inappropriate and non-evidence based drugs. Doctors were randomly allocated to either the electronic decision support tool or to provide treatment as usual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. The key secondary outcome was reduction in the number of drugs. RESULTS: 3904 adults were enrolled between January and October 2015. 181 practices and 1953 participants were assigned to electronic decision support (intervention group) and 178 practices and 1951 participants to treatment as usual (control group). The primary outcome (composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months) occurred in 871 (44.6%) participants in the intervention group and 944 (48.4%) in the control group. In an intention-to-treat analysis the odds ratio of the composite outcome was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.07; P=0.19, 997 of 1953 v 1055 of 1951). In an analysis restricted to participants attending practice according to protocol, a difference was found favouring the intervention (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.98; 774 of 1682 v 873 of 1712, P=0.03). By 24 months the number of prescribed drugs had decreased in the intervention group compared with control group (uncontrolled mean change −0.42 v 0.06: adjusted mean difference −0.45, 95% confidence interval −0.63 to −0.26; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In intention-to-treat analysis, a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review of elderly people with polypharmacy showed no conclusive effects on the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. Nonetheless, a reduction in drugs was achieved without detriment to patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10137559.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73011642020-06-23 Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial Rieckert, Anja Reeves, David Altiner, Attila Drewelow, Eva Esmail, Aneez Flamm, Maria Hann, Mark Johansson, Tim Klaassen-Mielke, Renate Kunnamo, Ilkka Löffler, Christin Piccoliori, Giuliano Sommerauer, Christina Trampisch, Ulrike S Vögele, Anna Woodham, Adrine Sönnichsen, Andreas BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review in elderly people with polypharmacy. DESIGN: Pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 359 general practices in Austria, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 3904 adults aged 75 years and older using eight or more drugs on a regular basis, recruited by their general practitioner. INTERVENTION: A newly developed electronic decision support tool comprising a comprehensive drug review to support general practitioners in deprescribing potentially inappropriate and non-evidence based drugs. Doctors were randomly allocated to either the electronic decision support tool or to provide treatment as usual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. The key secondary outcome was reduction in the number of drugs. RESULTS: 3904 adults were enrolled between January and October 2015. 181 practices and 1953 participants were assigned to electronic decision support (intervention group) and 178 practices and 1951 participants to treatment as usual (control group). The primary outcome (composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months) occurred in 871 (44.6%) participants in the intervention group and 944 (48.4%) in the control group. In an intention-to-treat analysis the odds ratio of the composite outcome was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.07; P=0.19, 997 of 1953 v 1055 of 1951). In an analysis restricted to participants attending practice according to protocol, a difference was found favouring the intervention (odds ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.98; 774 of 1682 v 873 of 1712, P=0.03). By 24 months the number of prescribed drugs had decreased in the intervention group compared with control group (uncontrolled mean change −0.42 v 0.06: adjusted mean difference −0.45, 95% confidence interval −0.63 to −0.26; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In intention-to-treat analysis, a computerised decision support tool for comprehensive drug review of elderly people with polypharmacy showed no conclusive effects on the composite of unplanned hospital admission or death by 24 months. Nonetheless, a reduction in drugs was achieved without detriment to patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10137559. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7301164/ /pubmed/32554566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1822 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Rieckert, Anja
Reeves, David
Altiner, Attila
Drewelow, Eva
Esmail, Aneez
Flamm, Maria
Hann, Mark
Johansson, Tim
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Kunnamo, Ilkka
Löffler, Christin
Piccoliori, Giuliano
Sommerauer, Christina
Trampisch, Ulrike S
Vögele, Anna
Woodham, Adrine
Sönnichsen, Andreas
Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort use of an electronic decision support tool to reduce polypharmacy in elderly people with chronic diseases: cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554566
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1822
work_keys_str_mv AT rieckertanja useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reevesdavid useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT altinerattila useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dreweloweva useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT esmailaneez useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT flammmaria useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hannmark useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT johanssontim useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT klaassenmielkerenate useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kunnamoilkka useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lofflerchristin useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT piccoliorigiuliano useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sommerauerchristina useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT trampischulrikes useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vogeleanna useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woodhamadrine useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sonnichsenandreas useofanelectronicdecisionsupporttooltoreducepolypharmacyinelderlypeoplewithchronicdiseasesclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial