Cargando…

Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population

Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oe, Misari, Ito, Masaya, Takebayashi, Yoshitake, Katayanagi, Akiko, Horikoshi, Masaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938
_version_ 1783547737920241664
author Oe, Misari
Ito, Masaya
Takebayashi, Yoshitake
Katayanagi, Akiko
Horikoshi, Masaru
author_facet Oe, Misari
Ito, Masaya
Takebayashi, Yoshitake
Katayanagi, Akiko
Horikoshi, Masaru
author_sort Oe, Misari
collection PubMed
description Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people who had experienced different potentially traumatic events. In addition, we estimated the comorbidity with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder according to these four diagnostic manuals. Method: A web-based survey (n = 6,180) was conducted from November 2016 to March 2017. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and other standardized measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Results: The prevalence of PTSD caseness according to ICD-11 was significantly lower as compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Cohen’s kappa between DSM-5 and ICD-11 was 0.79, indicating substantial agreement. Comorbidity with depression was significantly higher in unique DSM-5 cases than in unique ICD-11 cases. Unique DSM-5 PTSD cases were significantly stronger functionally impaired than unique ICD-11 PTSD cases. Conclusions: Although requiring fewer items, the ICD-11 showed substantial agreement with DSM-5 regarding PTSD caseness. The lower comorbidity rates in unique cases may support the concept of the ICD-11 which intends to reduce comorbidity by identifying the core elements of PTSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73016942020-06-25 Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population Oe, Misari Ito, Masaya Takebayashi, Yoshitake Katayanagi, Akiko Horikoshi, Masaru Eur J Psychotraumatol Clinical Research Article Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people who had experienced different potentially traumatic events. In addition, we estimated the comorbidity with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder according to these four diagnostic manuals. Method: A web-based survey (n = 6,180) was conducted from November 2016 to March 2017. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and other standardized measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Results: The prevalence of PTSD caseness according to ICD-11 was significantly lower as compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Cohen’s kappa between DSM-5 and ICD-11 was 0.79, indicating substantial agreement. Comorbidity with depression was significantly higher in unique DSM-5 cases than in unique ICD-11 cases. Unique DSM-5 PTSD cases were significantly stronger functionally impaired than unique ICD-11 PTSD cases. Conclusions: Although requiring fewer items, the ICD-11 showed substantial agreement with DSM-5 regarding PTSD caseness. The lower comorbidity rates in unique cases may support the concept of the ICD-11 which intends to reduce comorbidity by identifying the core elements of PTSD. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7301694/ /pubmed/32595913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Article
Oe, Misari
Ito, Masaya
Takebayashi, Yoshitake
Katayanagi, Akiko
Horikoshi, Masaru
Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title_full Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title_fullStr Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title_short Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
title_sort prevalence and comorbidity of the icd-11 and dsm-5 for ptsd caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the japanese population
topic Clinical Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938
work_keys_str_mv AT oemisari prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation
AT itomasaya prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation
AT takebayashiyoshitake prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation
AT katayanagiakiko prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation
AT horikoshimasaru prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation