Cargando…
Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population
Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938 |
_version_ | 1783547737920241664 |
---|---|
author | Oe, Misari Ito, Masaya Takebayashi, Yoshitake Katayanagi, Akiko Horikoshi, Masaru |
author_facet | Oe, Misari Ito, Masaya Takebayashi, Yoshitake Katayanagi, Akiko Horikoshi, Masaru |
author_sort | Oe, Misari |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people who had experienced different potentially traumatic events. In addition, we estimated the comorbidity with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder according to these four diagnostic manuals. Method: A web-based survey (n = 6,180) was conducted from November 2016 to March 2017. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and other standardized measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Results: The prevalence of PTSD caseness according to ICD-11 was significantly lower as compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Cohen’s kappa between DSM-5 and ICD-11 was 0.79, indicating substantial agreement. Comorbidity with depression was significantly higher in unique DSM-5 cases than in unique ICD-11 cases. Unique DSM-5 PTSD cases were significantly stronger functionally impaired than unique ICD-11 PTSD cases. Conclusions: Although requiring fewer items, the ICD-11 showed substantial agreement with DSM-5 regarding PTSD caseness. The lower comorbidity rates in unique cases may support the concept of the ICD-11 which intends to reduce comorbidity by identifying the core elements of PTSD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7301694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73016942020-06-25 Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population Oe, Misari Ito, Masaya Takebayashi, Yoshitake Katayanagi, Akiko Horikoshi, Masaru Eur J Psychotraumatol Clinical Research Article Background: The diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differ between DSM-5 and ICD-11, which may affect the estimation of prevalence. Objective: To investigate the concordance of ICD-11 and DSM-5, as compared to ICD-10 and DSM-IV, regarding PTSD caseness among Japanese people who had experienced different potentially traumatic events. In addition, we estimated the comorbidity with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder according to these four diagnostic manuals. Method: A web-based survey (n = 6,180) was conducted from November 2016 to March 2017. Participants completed the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, and other standardized measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety. Results: The prevalence of PTSD caseness according to ICD-11 was significantly lower as compared to DSM-IV, DSM-5, and ICD-10. Cohen’s kappa between DSM-5 and ICD-11 was 0.79, indicating substantial agreement. Comorbidity with depression was significantly higher in unique DSM-5 cases than in unique ICD-11 cases. Unique DSM-5 PTSD cases were significantly stronger functionally impaired than unique ICD-11 PTSD cases. Conclusions: Although requiring fewer items, the ICD-11 showed substantial agreement with DSM-5 regarding PTSD caseness. The lower comorbidity rates in unique cases may support the concept of the ICD-11 which intends to reduce comorbidity by identifying the core elements of PTSD. Taylor & Francis 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7301694/ /pubmed/32595913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Oe, Misari Ito, Masaya Takebayashi, Yoshitake Katayanagi, Akiko Horikoshi, Masaru Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title | Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title_full | Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title_short | Prevalence and comorbidity of the ICD-11 and DSM-5 for PTSD caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the Japanese population |
title_sort | prevalence and comorbidity of the icd-11 and dsm-5 for ptsd caseness with previous diagnostic manuals among the japanese population |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1753938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oemisari prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation AT itomasaya prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation AT takebayashiyoshitake prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation AT katayanagiakiko prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation AT horikoshimasaru prevalenceandcomorbidityoftheicd11anddsm5forptsdcasenesswithpreviousdiagnosticmanualsamongthejapanesepopulation |