Cargando…

Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations

In the vineyards of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany), two different types of Shepherd’s Purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) coexist: (1) the common type called ‘wild type’, and (2) the decandric type called Capsella apetala or ‘Spe’ with four stamens in place of the four petals. In this study, we compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuffer, Barbara, Schorsch, Michael, Hameister, Steffen, Knuesting, Johannes, Selinski, Jennifer, Scheibe, Renate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9226
_version_ 1783547772873474048
author Neuffer, Barbara
Schorsch, Michael
Hameister, Steffen
Knuesting, Johannes
Selinski, Jennifer
Scheibe, Renate
author_facet Neuffer, Barbara
Schorsch, Michael
Hameister, Steffen
Knuesting, Johannes
Selinski, Jennifer
Scheibe, Renate
author_sort Neuffer, Barbara
collection PubMed
description In the vineyards of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany), two different types of Shepherd’s Purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) coexist: (1) the common type called ‘wild type’, and (2) the decandric type called Capsella apetala or ‘Spe’ with four stamens in place of the four petals. In this study, we compare the anatomical and physiological characters of rosette leaves of the respective types. Progeny of individual plants was cultivated in growth chambers under low- and high-light conditions. Under low-light conditions, the stomata densities of the adaxial and abaxial epidermis did not differ between the two types. When grown under high-light conditions, wild type and Spe, both exhibited increased stomata densities compared to low-light conditions, but Spe to a lesser extent than the wild type. The maximal photosynthetic capacity of Spe was lower in both, low-light and high-light conditions compared to wild-type plants. Under all CO(2) concentrations, Spe seemed to be less productive. The less effective CO(2) assimilation of the Spe mutant C. apetala was accompanied by later flowering. This fact prolonged the vegetative phase of Spe by about two weeks and was sufficient for the maintenance of both populations stably over years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73018972020-06-24 Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations Neuffer, Barbara Schorsch, Michael Hameister, Steffen Knuesting, Johannes Selinski, Jennifer Scheibe, Renate PeerJ Ecology In the vineyards of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany), two different types of Shepherd’s Purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris) coexist: (1) the common type called ‘wild type’, and (2) the decandric type called Capsella apetala or ‘Spe’ with four stamens in place of the four petals. In this study, we compare the anatomical and physiological characters of rosette leaves of the respective types. Progeny of individual plants was cultivated in growth chambers under low- and high-light conditions. Under low-light conditions, the stomata densities of the adaxial and abaxial epidermis did not differ between the two types. When grown under high-light conditions, wild type and Spe, both exhibited increased stomata densities compared to low-light conditions, but Spe to a lesser extent than the wild type. The maximal photosynthetic capacity of Spe was lower in both, low-light and high-light conditions compared to wild-type plants. Under all CO(2) concentrations, Spe seemed to be less productive. The less effective CO(2) assimilation of the Spe mutant C. apetala was accompanied by later flowering. This fact prolonged the vegetative phase of Spe by about two weeks and was sufficient for the maintenance of both populations stably over years. PeerJ Inc. 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7301897/ /pubmed/32587795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9226 Text en ©2020 Neuffer et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) , which permits using, remixing, and building upon the work non-commercially, as long as it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Neuffer, Barbara
Schorsch, Michael
Hameister, Steffen
Knuesting, Johannes
Selinski, Jennifer
Scheibe, Renate
Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title_full Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title_fullStr Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title_full_unstemmed Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title_short Physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
title_sort physiological and anatomical differentiation of two sympatric weed populations
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9226
work_keys_str_mv AT neufferbarbara physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations
AT schorschmichael physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations
AT hameistersteffen physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations
AT knuestingjohannes physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations
AT selinskijennifer physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations
AT scheiberenate physiologicalandanatomicaldifferentiationoftwosympatricweedpopulations