Cargando…

Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research should benefit society at large. Involving citizens those who are affected by research may not only increase the quality, but can also push research towards generating greater societal benefits and relevant outcomes for citizens. Including citizens in research also h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaisler, Raphaela E., Missbach, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00208-3
_version_ 1783547776117768192
author Kaisler, Raphaela E.
Missbach, Benjamin
author_facet Kaisler, Raphaela E.
Missbach, Benjamin
author_sort Kaisler, Raphaela E.
collection PubMed
description PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research should benefit society at large. Involving citizens those who are affected by research may not only increase the quality, but can also push research towards generating greater societal benefits and relevant outcomes for citizens. Including citizens in research also has ethical implications, which necessitate structured guidance on ‘how to’ meaningfully involve them. In our project, we invited a multi-stakeholder group consisting of researchers from multiple disciplines, citizen scientists, youth and patient advocates to co-create a guide on ‘how to’ meaningfully involve citizens in research. In five consecutive workshops, we discussed how the characteristics of interactions between researchers and citizens (e.g., building trustful relationships and communication) and what a possible project steering structure enabling meaningful public involvement in research could look like. As a result of these workshops, the PPIE ‘How to’ Guide for Researchers was developed to support the implementation of ‘Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement’ (PPIE) activities and informed a PPIE Implementation Programme funding public involvement activities in Austria. ABSTRACT: Involving citizens in research is not widely utilised across research disciplines and countries. It requires the readiness of researchers and their organisations as well as guides on ‘how to’ successfully involve citizens in a meaningful way. Including the patient and citizen voice in research activities has been most frequently demonstrated in health research, however, is implemented along various degrees of involvement – from passively receiving information about science to actively involving the citizens in steering projects and research activities. In this commentary, we aim to report a multi-stakeholder co-creation process developing ‘Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement’ (PPIE) activities across disciplines to provide guidance for researchers and the public. We use Ludwig Boltzmann Society’s (LBG) organisational framework as a case study, hence it consists of research institutes ranging from the life sciences to humanities and therefore represents a well-suited research environment for this endeavour. In a co-creation approach – to accomplish a shared understanding of public involvement in research among different stakeholders – a multi-stakeholder group comprising 11 researchers from natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and humanities, and 13 citizens (such as patient advocates, young people and citizen scientists) were involved. In five consecutive workshops, we co-developed the nature of interactions between citizens and researchers, as well as governance structures enabling meaningful involvement in research. The workshops’ content was informed by an initial literature review. As a result of this process, the PPIE ‘How to’ Guide for Researchers was developed to support the implementation of involvement activities in their research projects according to the public involvement principles. These principles informed assessment criteria for the newly established PPIE Implementation Programme at LBG. It provides funding and support for public involvement activities in research to embed a sustainable and meaningful implementation of public involvement activities in Austria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73019672020-06-19 Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers Kaisler, Raphaela E. Missbach, Benjamin Res Involv Engagem Commentary PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research should benefit society at large. Involving citizens those who are affected by research may not only increase the quality, but can also push research towards generating greater societal benefits and relevant outcomes for citizens. Including citizens in research also has ethical implications, which necessitate structured guidance on ‘how to’ meaningfully involve them. In our project, we invited a multi-stakeholder group consisting of researchers from multiple disciplines, citizen scientists, youth and patient advocates to co-create a guide on ‘how to’ meaningfully involve citizens in research. In five consecutive workshops, we discussed how the characteristics of interactions between researchers and citizens (e.g., building trustful relationships and communication) and what a possible project steering structure enabling meaningful public involvement in research could look like. As a result of these workshops, the PPIE ‘How to’ Guide for Researchers was developed to support the implementation of ‘Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement’ (PPIE) activities and informed a PPIE Implementation Programme funding public involvement activities in Austria. ABSTRACT: Involving citizens in research is not widely utilised across research disciplines and countries. It requires the readiness of researchers and their organisations as well as guides on ‘how to’ successfully involve citizens in a meaningful way. Including the patient and citizen voice in research activities has been most frequently demonstrated in health research, however, is implemented along various degrees of involvement – from passively receiving information about science to actively involving the citizens in steering projects and research activities. In this commentary, we aim to report a multi-stakeholder co-creation process developing ‘Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement’ (PPIE) activities across disciplines to provide guidance for researchers and the public. We use Ludwig Boltzmann Society’s (LBG) organisational framework as a case study, hence it consists of research institutes ranging from the life sciences to humanities and therefore represents a well-suited research environment for this endeavour. In a co-creation approach – to accomplish a shared understanding of public involvement in research among different stakeholders – a multi-stakeholder group comprising 11 researchers from natural sciences, life sciences, social sciences and humanities, and 13 citizens (such as patient advocates, young people and citizen scientists) were involved. In five consecutive workshops, we co-developed the nature of interactions between citizens and researchers, as well as governance structures enabling meaningful involvement in research. The workshops’ content was informed by an initial literature review. As a result of this process, the PPIE ‘How to’ Guide for Researchers was developed to support the implementation of involvement activities in their research projects according to the public involvement principles. These principles informed assessment criteria for the newly established PPIE Implementation Programme at LBG. It provides funding and support for public involvement activities in research to embed a sustainable and meaningful implementation of public involvement activities in Austria. BioMed Central 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7301967/ /pubmed/32566249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00208-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Kaisler, Raphaela E.
Missbach, Benjamin
Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title_full Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title_fullStr Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title_full_unstemmed Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title_short Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
title_sort co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement ‘how to’ guide for researchers
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00208-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kaislerraphaelae cocreatingapatientandpublicinvolvementandengagementhowtoguideforresearchers
AT missbachbenjamin cocreatingapatientandpublicinvolvementandengagementhowtoguideforresearchers