Cargando…

Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital

BACKGROUND: Unused or rarely used instruments in standard surgical trays can unnecessarily increase costs. Prior studies have demonstrated the practicality and cost savings of reduced instrument tray sizes in various subspecialties. This study describes results and estimated cost savings from a redu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grodsky, Jacob D., Theophanous, Christos N., Schechet, Sidney A., Veldman, Peter B., Hariprasad, Seenu M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00215-2
_version_ 1783547782234112000
author Grodsky, Jacob D.
Theophanous, Christos N.
Schechet, Sidney A.
Veldman, Peter B.
Hariprasad, Seenu M.
author_facet Grodsky, Jacob D.
Theophanous, Christos N.
Schechet, Sidney A.
Veldman, Peter B.
Hariprasad, Seenu M.
author_sort Grodsky, Jacob D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unused or rarely used instruments in standard surgical trays can unnecessarily increase costs. Prior studies have demonstrated the practicality and cost savings of reduced instrument tray sizes in various subspecialties. This study describes results and estimated cost savings from a reduced instrument tray used for vitrectomy surgery at a large, tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Common usage patterns of vitrectomy instruments by one retina surgeon were reviewed and a reduced instrument vitrectomy tray was created and implemented in successive vitrectomy surgeries. Need for opening the previously utilized larger tray was recorded. Estimated cost savings of the new trays were calculated based upon per instrument sterilization, processing, and instrument replacement costs. RESULTS: New vitrectomy trays including just 7 instruments (89% reduction compared to original trays) were created and implemented in 189 successive cases. The original tray was never opened. Estimated cost savings from saved sterilization and processing resources is approximately $9588 per year. Assuming 5- and 10-year lifespan per instrument, annual cost avoidance is projected at $7886 and $15,772, respectively. Other indirect benefits relevant to healthcare quality were also noted. CONCLUSION: A reduced instrument tray can be successfully implemented for vitrectomy surgery and can result in significant indirect benefits as well as direct cost savings from reduced sterilization costs. Our study highlights the substantial impact made by evaluating the usage pattern and making appropriate instrument tray changes for just one retina surgeon. Applying these same methods to other surgeons and specialties can have significant implications on healthcare costs and quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7301997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73019972020-06-19 Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital Grodsky, Jacob D. Theophanous, Christos N. Schechet, Sidney A. Veldman, Peter B. Hariprasad, Seenu M. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: Unused or rarely used instruments in standard surgical trays can unnecessarily increase costs. Prior studies have demonstrated the practicality and cost savings of reduced instrument tray sizes in various subspecialties. This study describes results and estimated cost savings from a reduced instrument tray used for vitrectomy surgery at a large, tertiary academic medical center. METHODS: Common usage patterns of vitrectomy instruments by one retina surgeon were reviewed and a reduced instrument vitrectomy tray was created and implemented in successive vitrectomy surgeries. Need for opening the previously utilized larger tray was recorded. Estimated cost savings of the new trays were calculated based upon per instrument sterilization, processing, and instrument replacement costs. RESULTS: New vitrectomy trays including just 7 instruments (89% reduction compared to original trays) were created and implemented in 189 successive cases. The original tray was never opened. Estimated cost savings from saved sterilization and processing resources is approximately $9588 per year. Assuming 5- and 10-year lifespan per instrument, annual cost avoidance is projected at $7886 and $15,772, respectively. Other indirect benefits relevant to healthcare quality were also noted. CONCLUSION: A reduced instrument tray can be successfully implemented for vitrectomy surgery and can result in significant indirect benefits as well as direct cost savings from reduced sterilization costs. Our study highlights the substantial impact made by evaluating the usage pattern and making appropriate instrument tray changes for just one retina surgeon. Applying these same methods to other surgeons and specialties can have significant implications on healthcare costs and quality. BioMed Central 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7301997/ /pubmed/32566250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00215-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Article
Grodsky, Jacob D.
Theophanous, Christos N.
Schechet, Sidney A.
Veldman, Peter B.
Hariprasad, Seenu M.
Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title_full Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title_fullStr Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title_full_unstemmed Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title_short Reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
title_sort reducing instruments in a vitrectomy surgical tray: cost savings and results from a major academic hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7301997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32566250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00215-2
work_keys_str_mv AT grodskyjacobd reducinginstrumentsinavitrectomysurgicaltraycostsavingsandresultsfromamajoracademichospital
AT theophanouschristosn reducinginstrumentsinavitrectomysurgicaltraycostsavingsandresultsfromamajoracademichospital
AT schechetsidneya reducinginstrumentsinavitrectomysurgicaltraycostsavingsandresultsfromamajoracademichospital
AT veldmanpeterb reducinginstrumentsinavitrectomysurgicaltraycostsavingsandresultsfromamajoracademichospital
AT hariprasadseenum reducinginstrumentsinavitrectomysurgicaltraycostsavingsandresultsfromamajoracademichospital