Cargando…

Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube

BACKGROUND: After prehospital insertion of i-gel, a popular supraglottic airway (SGA), fiberoptic-guided intubation through i-gel is often required to switch the i-gel to a definitive airway for anticipated difficult airway. The Aintree intubation catheter (AIC) was developed for this purpose yet it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chae, Yun Jeong, Lee, Heirim, Jun, Bokyeong, Yi, In Kyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01069-9
_version_ 1783547796762132480
author Chae, Yun Jeong
Lee, Heirim
Jun, Bokyeong
Yi, In Kyong
author_facet Chae, Yun Jeong
Lee, Heirim
Jun, Bokyeong
Yi, In Kyong
author_sort Chae, Yun Jeong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After prehospital insertion of i-gel, a popular supraglottic airway (SGA), fiberoptic-guided intubation through i-gel is often required to switch the i-gel to a definitive airway for anticipated difficult airway. The Aintree intubation catheter (AIC) was developed for this purpose yet it requires many procedural steps during which maintenance of adequate ventilation is difficult. We custom-made a long endotracheal tube (LET) which may facilitate this procedure and compared the efficacy of the AIC and LET in a cervical immobilized manikin. METHODS: In this 2 × 2 crossover manikin-based trial, 20 anaesthesiologists and residents performed both methods in random order. Total intubation time, fiberoptic time, and procedure time were recorded. The ease of insertion, procedure failure rate, difficulty score, and participants’ preference were recorded. RESULTS: Total intubation time was significantly shorter for the LET than the AIC group (70.8 ± 16.4 s vs 94.0 ± 28.4 s, P = 0.001). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the LET group (51.9 ± 13.8 s vs 76.5 ± 25.4 s, P <  0.001). The ease of insertion score was lower, i.e., easier, in the AIC than the LET group (2.0 [1.0–2.75] vs 1.0 [1.0–1.0], P <  0.001). Fiberoptic time (19.0 ± 6.9 s vs 17.5 ± 12.3 s) and subjective difficulty (4.0 [3.0–6.0] vs 4.0 [3.0–5.75]) were similar between groups. Fourteen participants preferred the LET method (70%) due to its fewer procedural steps. CONCLUSIONS: LET resulted in a shorter intubation time than the AIC during fiberoptic-guided intubation through the i-gel, possibly due to the less procedural steps compared to AIC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03645174 (ClinicalTrials.gov, Aug 22, 2018).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7302158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73021582020-06-19 Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube Chae, Yun Jeong Lee, Heirim Jun, Bokyeong Yi, In Kyong BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: After prehospital insertion of i-gel, a popular supraglottic airway (SGA), fiberoptic-guided intubation through i-gel is often required to switch the i-gel to a definitive airway for anticipated difficult airway. The Aintree intubation catheter (AIC) was developed for this purpose yet it requires many procedural steps during which maintenance of adequate ventilation is difficult. We custom-made a long endotracheal tube (LET) which may facilitate this procedure and compared the efficacy of the AIC and LET in a cervical immobilized manikin. METHODS: In this 2 × 2 crossover manikin-based trial, 20 anaesthesiologists and residents performed both methods in random order. Total intubation time, fiberoptic time, and procedure time were recorded. The ease of insertion, procedure failure rate, difficulty score, and participants’ preference were recorded. RESULTS: Total intubation time was significantly shorter for the LET than the AIC group (70.8 ± 16.4 s vs 94.0 ± 28.4 s, P = 0.001). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the LET group (51.9 ± 13.8 s vs 76.5 ± 25.4 s, P <  0.001). The ease of insertion score was lower, i.e., easier, in the AIC than the LET group (2.0 [1.0–2.75] vs 1.0 [1.0–1.0], P <  0.001). Fiberoptic time (19.0 ± 6.9 s vs 17.5 ± 12.3 s) and subjective difficulty (4.0 [3.0–6.0] vs 4.0 [3.0–5.75]) were similar between groups. Fourteen participants preferred the LET method (70%) due to its fewer procedural steps. CONCLUSIONS: LET resulted in a shorter intubation time than the AIC during fiberoptic-guided intubation through the i-gel, possibly due to the less procedural steps compared to AIC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03645174 (ClinicalTrials.gov, Aug 22, 2018). BioMed Central 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7302158/ /pubmed/32552828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01069-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chae, Yun Jeong
Lee, Heirim
Jun, Bokyeong
Yi, In Kyong
Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title_full Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title_fullStr Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title_full_unstemmed Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title_short Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
title_sort conversion of i-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01069-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chaeyunjeong conversionofigeltodefinitiveairwayinacervicalimmobilizedmanikinaintreeintubationcathetervslongendotrachealtube
AT leeheirim conversionofigeltodefinitiveairwayinacervicalimmobilizedmanikinaintreeintubationcathetervslongendotrachealtube
AT junbokyeong conversionofigeltodefinitiveairwayinacervicalimmobilizedmanikinaintreeintubationcathetervslongendotrachealtube
AT yiinkyong conversionofigeltodefinitiveairwayinacervicalimmobilizedmanikinaintreeintubationcathetervslongendotrachealtube