Cargando…

SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters

Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnaout, Ramy, Lee, Rose A., Lee, Ghee Rye, Callahan, Cody, Yen, Christina F., Smith, Kenneth P., Arora, Rohit, Kirby, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144
_version_ 1783547800187830272
author Arnaout, Ramy
Lee, Rose A.
Lee, Ghee Rye
Callahan, Cody
Yen, Christina F.
Smith, Kenneth P.
Arora, Rohit
Kirby, James E.
author_facet Arnaout, Ramy
Lee, Rose A.
Lee, Ghee Rye
Callahan, Cody
Yen, Christina F.
Smith, Kenneth P.
Arora, Rohit
Kirby, James E.
author_sort Arnaout, Ramy
collection PubMed
description Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter of transport media. However, LoDs of currently approved assays vary over 10,000-fold. Assays with higher LoDs will miss more infected patients, resulting in more false negatives. However, the false-negative rate for a given LoD remains unknown. Here we address this question using over 27,500 test results for patients from across our healthcare network tested using the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 EUA. These results suggest that each 10-fold increase in LoD is expected to increase the false negative rate by 13%, missing an additional one in eight infected patients. The highest LoDs on the market will miss a majority of infected patients, with false negative rates as high as 70%. These results suggest that choice of assay has meaningful clinical and epidemiological consequences. The limit of detection matters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7302192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73021922020-06-23 SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters Arnaout, Ramy Lee, Rose A. Lee, Ghee Rye Callahan, Cody Yen, Christina F. Smith, Kenneth P. Arora, Rohit Kirby, James E. bioRxiv Article Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter of transport media. However, LoDs of currently approved assays vary over 10,000-fold. Assays with higher LoDs will miss more infected patients, resulting in more false negatives. However, the false-negative rate for a given LoD remains unknown. Here we address this question using over 27,500 test results for patients from across our healthcare network tested using the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 EUA. These results suggest that each 10-fold increase in LoD is expected to increase the false negative rate by 13%, missing an additional one in eight infected patients. The highest LoDs on the market will miss a majority of infected patients, with false negative rates as high as 70%. These results suggest that choice of assay has meaningful clinical and epidemiological consequences. The limit of detection matters. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7302192/ /pubmed/32577640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Arnaout, Ramy
Lee, Rose A.
Lee, Ghee Rye
Callahan, Cody
Yen, Christina F.
Smith, Kenneth P.
Arora, Rohit
Kirby, James E.
SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title_full SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title_fullStr SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title_short SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
title_sort sars-cov2 testing: the limit of detection matters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144
work_keys_str_mv AT arnaoutramy sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT leerosea sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT leegheerye sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT callahancody sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT yenchristinaf sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT smithkennethp sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT arorarohit sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters
AT kirbyjamese sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters