Cargando…
SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters
Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144 |
_version_ | 1783547800187830272 |
---|---|
author | Arnaout, Ramy Lee, Rose A. Lee, Ghee Rye Callahan, Cody Yen, Christina F. Smith, Kenneth P. Arora, Rohit Kirby, James E. |
author_facet | Arnaout, Ramy Lee, Rose A. Lee, Ghee Rye Callahan, Cody Yen, Christina F. Smith, Kenneth P. Arora, Rohit Kirby, James E. |
author_sort | Arnaout, Ramy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter of transport media. However, LoDs of currently approved assays vary over 10,000-fold. Assays with higher LoDs will miss more infected patients, resulting in more false negatives. However, the false-negative rate for a given LoD remains unknown. Here we address this question using over 27,500 test results for patients from across our healthcare network tested using the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 EUA. These results suggest that each 10-fold increase in LoD is expected to increase the false negative rate by 13%, missing an additional one in eight infected patients. The highest LoDs on the market will miss a majority of infected patients, with false negative rates as high as 70%. These results suggest that choice of assay has meaningful clinical and epidemiological consequences. The limit of detection matters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7302192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73021922020-06-23 SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters Arnaout, Ramy Lee, Rose A. Lee, Ghee Rye Callahan, Cody Yen, Christina F. Smith, Kenneth P. Arora, Rohit Kirby, James E. bioRxiv Article Resolving the COVID-19 pandemic requires diagnostic testing to determine which individuals are infected and which are not. The current gold standard is to perform RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal samples. Best-in-class assays demonstrate a limit of detection (LoD) of ~100 copies of viral RNA per milliliter of transport media. However, LoDs of currently approved assays vary over 10,000-fold. Assays with higher LoDs will miss more infected patients, resulting in more false negatives. However, the false-negative rate for a given LoD remains unknown. Here we address this question using over 27,500 test results for patients from across our healthcare network tested using the Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 EUA. These results suggest that each 10-fold increase in LoD is expected to increase the false negative rate by 13%, missing an additional one in eight infected patients. The highest LoDs on the market will miss a majority of infected patients, with false negative rates as high as 70%. These results suggest that choice of assay has meaningful clinical and epidemiological consequences. The limit of detection matters. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7302192/ /pubmed/32577640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Arnaout, Ramy Lee, Rose A. Lee, Ghee Rye Callahan, Cody Yen, Christina F. Smith, Kenneth P. Arora, Rohit Kirby, James E. SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title | SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title_full | SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title_fullStr | SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title_full_unstemmed | SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title_short | SARS-CoV2 Testing: The Limit of Detection Matters |
title_sort | sars-cov2 testing: the limit of detection matters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32577640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.131144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arnaoutramy sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT leerosea sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT leegheerye sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT callahancody sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT yenchristinaf sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT smithkennethp sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT arorarohit sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters AT kirbyjamese sarscov2testingthelimitofdetectionmatters |