Cargando…
Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia
BACKGROUND: National audit is a key strategy used to improve care for patients with dementia. Audit and feedback has been shown to be effective, but with variation in how much it improves care. Both evidence and theory identify active ingredients associated with effectiveness of audit and feedback....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z |
_version_ | 1783547836689809408 |
---|---|
author | Sykes, Michael Thomson, Richard Kolehmainen, Niina Allan, Louise Finch, Tracy |
author_facet | Sykes, Michael Thomson, Richard Kolehmainen, Niina Allan, Louise Finch, Tracy |
author_sort | Sykes, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: National audit is a key strategy used to improve care for patients with dementia. Audit and feedback has been shown to be effective, but with variation in how much it improves care. Both evidence and theory identify active ingredients associated with effectiveness of audit and feedback. It is unclear to what extent national audit is consistent with evidence- and theory-based audit and feedback best practice. METHODS: We explored how the national audit of dementia is undertaken in order to identify opportunities to enhance its impact upon the improvement of care for people with dementia. We undertook a multi-method qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia at six hospitals within four diverse English National Health Service organisations. Inductive framework analysis of 32 semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis (n = 39) and 44 h of observations (n = 36) was undertaken. Findings were presented iteratively to a stakeholder group until a stable description of the audit and feedback process was produced. RESULTS: Each organisation invested considerable resources in the audit. The audit results were dependent upon the interpretation by case note reviewers who extracted the data. The national report was read by a small number of people in each organisation, who translated it into an internal report and action plan. The internal report was presented at specialty- and organisation-level committees. The internal report did not include information that was important to how committee members collectively decided whether and how to improve performance. Participants reported that the national audit findings may not reach clinicians who were not part of the specialty or organisation-level committees. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable organisational commitment to the national audit of dementia. We describe potential evidence- and theory-informed enhancements to the enactment of the audit to improve the local response to performance feedback in the national audit. The enhancements relate to the content and delivery of the feedback from the national audit provider, support for the clinicians leading the organisational response to the feedback, and the feedback provided within the organisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7302390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73023902020-06-19 Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia Sykes, Michael Thomson, Richard Kolehmainen, Niina Allan, Louise Finch, Tracy Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: National audit is a key strategy used to improve care for patients with dementia. Audit and feedback has been shown to be effective, but with variation in how much it improves care. Both evidence and theory identify active ingredients associated with effectiveness of audit and feedback. It is unclear to what extent national audit is consistent with evidence- and theory-based audit and feedback best practice. METHODS: We explored how the national audit of dementia is undertaken in order to identify opportunities to enhance its impact upon the improvement of care for people with dementia. We undertook a multi-method qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia at six hospitals within four diverse English National Health Service organisations. Inductive framework analysis of 32 semi-structured interviews, documentary analysis (n = 39) and 44 h of observations (n = 36) was undertaken. Findings were presented iteratively to a stakeholder group until a stable description of the audit and feedback process was produced. RESULTS: Each organisation invested considerable resources in the audit. The audit results were dependent upon the interpretation by case note reviewers who extracted the data. The national report was read by a small number of people in each organisation, who translated it into an internal report and action plan. The internal report was presented at specialty- and organisation-level committees. The internal report did not include information that was important to how committee members collectively decided whether and how to improve performance. Participants reported that the national audit findings may not reach clinicians who were not part of the specialty or organisation-level committees. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable organisational commitment to the national audit of dementia. We describe potential evidence- and theory-informed enhancements to the enactment of the audit to improve the local response to performance feedback in the national audit. The enhancements relate to the content and delivery of the feedback from the national audit provider, support for the clinicians leading the organisational response to the feedback, and the feedback provided within the organisation. BioMed Central 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7302390/ /pubmed/32552860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sykes, Michael Thomson, Richard Kolehmainen, Niina Allan, Louise Finch, Tracy Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title | Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title_full | Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title_fullStr | Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title_full_unstemmed | Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title_short | Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
title_sort | impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32552860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01004-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sykesmichael impetustochangeamultisitequalitativeexplorationofthenationalauditofdementia AT thomsonrichard impetustochangeamultisitequalitativeexplorationofthenationalauditofdementia AT kolehmainenniina impetustochangeamultisitequalitativeexplorationofthenationalauditofdementia AT allanlouise impetustochangeamultisitequalitativeexplorationofthenationalauditofdementia AT finchtracy impetustochangeamultisitequalitativeexplorationofthenationalauditofdementia |