Cargando…

How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?

[Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Sangbae, Ghosh, Soumadwip, Jana, Suvamay, Robertson, Nathan, Tate, Christopher G., Vaidehi, Nagarajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183
_version_ 1783547861725609984
author Lee, Sangbae
Ghosh, Soumadwip
Jana, Suvamay
Robertson, Nathan
Tate, Christopher G.
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
author_facet Lee, Sangbae
Ghosh, Soumadwip
Jana, Suvamay
Robertson, Nathan
Tate, Christopher G.
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
author_sort Lee, Sangbae
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15425–15433], we showed that GPCRs in alkyl glucosides were highly dynamic, resulting in the penetration of detergent molecules between transmembrane α-helices, which is the initial step in receptor denaturation. Although this was not observed for GPCRs in dodecyl maltoside (DDM, also known as lauryl maltoside), even this detergent is not mild enough to preserve the integrity of many GPCRs during purification. Lauryl maltose neopentylglycol (LMNG) detergents have been found to have significant advantages for purifying GPCRs in a native state as they impart more stability to the receptor than DDM. To gain insights into how they stabilize GPCRs, we used atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of wild type adenosine A(2A) receptor (WT-A(2A)R), thermostabilized A(2A)R (tA(2A)R), and wild type β(2)-adrenoceptor (β(2)AR) in a variety of detergents (LMNG, DMNG, OGNG, and DDM). Analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of tA(2A)R in LMNG, DMNG, and OGNG showed that this series of detergents exhibited behavior very similar to that of an analogous series of detergents DDM, DM, and OG in our previous study. However, there was a striking difference upon comparison of the behavior of LMNG to that of DDM. LMNG showed considerably less motion than DDM, which resulted in the enhanced density of the aliphatic chains around the hydrophobic regions of the receptor and considerably more hydrogen bond formation between the head groups. This contributed to enhanced interaction energies between both detergent molecules and between the receptor and detergent, explaining the enhanced stability of GPCRs purified in this detergent. Branched detergents occlude between transmembrane helices and reduce their flexibility. Our results provide a rational foundation to develop detergent variants for stabilizing membrane proteins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7302508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73025082020-06-19 How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? Lee, Sangbae Ghosh, Soumadwip Jana, Suvamay Robertson, Nathan Tate, Christopher G. Vaidehi, Nagarajan Biochemistry [Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15425–15433], we showed that GPCRs in alkyl glucosides were highly dynamic, resulting in the penetration of detergent molecules between transmembrane α-helices, which is the initial step in receptor denaturation. Although this was not observed for GPCRs in dodecyl maltoside (DDM, also known as lauryl maltoside), even this detergent is not mild enough to preserve the integrity of many GPCRs during purification. Lauryl maltose neopentylglycol (LMNG) detergents have been found to have significant advantages for purifying GPCRs in a native state as they impart more stability to the receptor than DDM. To gain insights into how they stabilize GPCRs, we used atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of wild type adenosine A(2A) receptor (WT-A(2A)R), thermostabilized A(2A)R (tA(2A)R), and wild type β(2)-adrenoceptor (β(2)AR) in a variety of detergents (LMNG, DMNG, OGNG, and DDM). Analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of tA(2A)R in LMNG, DMNG, and OGNG showed that this series of detergents exhibited behavior very similar to that of an analogous series of detergents DDM, DM, and OG in our previous study. However, there was a striking difference upon comparison of the behavior of LMNG to that of DDM. LMNG showed considerably less motion than DDM, which resulted in the enhanced density of the aliphatic chains around the hydrophobic regions of the receptor and considerably more hydrogen bond formation between the head groups. This contributed to enhanced interaction energies between both detergent molecules and between the receptor and detergent, explaining the enhanced stability of GPCRs purified in this detergent. Branched detergents occlude between transmembrane helices and reduce their flexibility. Our results provide a rational foundation to develop detergent variants for stabilizing membrane proteins. American Chemical Society 2020-05-21 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7302508/ /pubmed/32437610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited.
spellingShingle Lee, Sangbae
Ghosh, Soumadwip
Jana, Suvamay
Robertson, Nathan
Tate, Christopher G.
Vaidehi, Nagarajan
How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title_full How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title_fullStr How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title_full_unstemmed How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title_short How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
title_sort how do branched detergents stabilize gpcrs in micelles?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183
work_keys_str_mv AT leesangbae howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles
AT ghoshsoumadwip howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles
AT janasuvamay howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles
AT robertsonnathan howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles
AT tatechristopherg howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles
AT vaidehinagarajan howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles