Cargando…
How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles?
[Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183 |
_version_ | 1783547861725609984 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Sangbae Ghosh, Soumadwip Jana, Suvamay Robertson, Nathan Tate, Christopher G. Vaidehi, Nagarajan |
author_facet | Lee, Sangbae Ghosh, Soumadwip Jana, Suvamay Robertson, Nathan Tate, Christopher G. Vaidehi, Nagarajan |
author_sort | Lee, Sangbae |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15425–15433], we showed that GPCRs in alkyl glucosides were highly dynamic, resulting in the penetration of detergent molecules between transmembrane α-helices, which is the initial step in receptor denaturation. Although this was not observed for GPCRs in dodecyl maltoside (DDM, also known as lauryl maltoside), even this detergent is not mild enough to preserve the integrity of many GPCRs during purification. Lauryl maltose neopentylglycol (LMNG) detergents have been found to have significant advantages for purifying GPCRs in a native state as they impart more stability to the receptor than DDM. To gain insights into how they stabilize GPCRs, we used atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of wild type adenosine A(2A) receptor (WT-A(2A)R), thermostabilized A(2A)R (tA(2A)R), and wild type β(2)-adrenoceptor (β(2)AR) in a variety of detergents (LMNG, DMNG, OGNG, and DDM). Analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of tA(2A)R in LMNG, DMNG, and OGNG showed that this series of detergents exhibited behavior very similar to that of an analogous series of detergents DDM, DM, and OG in our previous study. However, there was a striking difference upon comparison of the behavior of LMNG to that of DDM. LMNG showed considerably less motion than DDM, which resulted in the enhanced density of the aliphatic chains around the hydrophobic regions of the receptor and considerably more hydrogen bond formation between the head groups. This contributed to enhanced interaction energies between both detergent molecules and between the receptor and detergent, explaining the enhanced stability of GPCRs purified in this detergent. Branched detergents occlude between transmembrane helices and reduce their flexibility. Our results provide a rational foundation to develop detergent variants for stabilizing membrane proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7302508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73025082020-06-19 How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? Lee, Sangbae Ghosh, Soumadwip Jana, Suvamay Robertson, Nathan Tate, Christopher G. Vaidehi, Nagarajan Biochemistry [Image: see text] The structural and functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are often studied in a detergent micellar environment, but many GPCRs tend to denature or aggregate in short alkyl chain detergents. In our previous work [Lee, S., et al. (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc.138, 15425–15433], we showed that GPCRs in alkyl glucosides were highly dynamic, resulting in the penetration of detergent molecules between transmembrane α-helices, which is the initial step in receptor denaturation. Although this was not observed for GPCRs in dodecyl maltoside (DDM, also known as lauryl maltoside), even this detergent is not mild enough to preserve the integrity of many GPCRs during purification. Lauryl maltose neopentylglycol (LMNG) detergents have been found to have significant advantages for purifying GPCRs in a native state as they impart more stability to the receptor than DDM. To gain insights into how they stabilize GPCRs, we used atomistic molecular dynamics simulations of wild type adenosine A(2A) receptor (WT-A(2A)R), thermostabilized A(2A)R (tA(2A)R), and wild type β(2)-adrenoceptor (β(2)AR) in a variety of detergents (LMNG, DMNG, OGNG, and DDM). Analysis of molecular dynamics simulations of tA(2A)R in LMNG, DMNG, and OGNG showed that this series of detergents exhibited behavior very similar to that of an analogous series of detergents DDM, DM, and OG in our previous study. However, there was a striking difference upon comparison of the behavior of LMNG to that of DDM. LMNG showed considerably less motion than DDM, which resulted in the enhanced density of the aliphatic chains around the hydrophobic regions of the receptor and considerably more hydrogen bond formation between the head groups. This contributed to enhanced interaction energies between both detergent molecules and between the receptor and detergent, explaining the enhanced stability of GPCRs purified in this detergent. Branched detergents occlude between transmembrane helices and reduce their flexibility. Our results provide a rational foundation to develop detergent variants for stabilizing membrane proteins. American Chemical Society 2020-05-21 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7302508/ /pubmed/32437610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Lee, Sangbae Ghosh, Soumadwip Jana, Suvamay Robertson, Nathan Tate, Christopher G. Vaidehi, Nagarajan How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title | How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title_full | How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title_fullStr | How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title_full_unstemmed | How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title_short | How Do Branched Detergents Stabilize GPCRs in Micelles? |
title_sort | how do branched detergents stabilize gpcrs in micelles? |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32437610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesangbae howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles AT ghoshsoumadwip howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles AT janasuvamay howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles AT robertsonnathan howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles AT tatechristopherg howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles AT vaidehinagarajan howdobrancheddetergentsstabilizegpcrsinmicelles |