Cargando…

Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data

BACKGROUND: Due to the absence and or costliness of biological measures such as glycated haemoglobin, diabetes case ascertainment and prevalence studies are usually conducted using surveys or routine health service use databases. However, the use of each of these sources is associated with its limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wubishet, Befikadu L., Harris, Melissa L., Forder, Peta M., Byles, Julie E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234812
_version_ 1783547902172332032
author Wubishet, Befikadu L.
Harris, Melissa L.
Forder, Peta M.
Byles, Julie E.
author_facet Wubishet, Befikadu L.
Harris, Melissa L.
Forder, Peta M.
Byles, Julie E.
author_sort Wubishet, Befikadu L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the absence and or costliness of biological measures such as glycated haemoglobin, diabetes case ascertainment and prevalence studies are usually conducted using surveys or routine health service use databases. However, the use of each of these sources is associated with its limitations potentially impacting the quality of the case ascertainment and prevalence estimation. This study aimed at ascertaining diabetes cases and estimating prevalence among mid- and older-age women through simultaneous use of a longitudinal survey and multiple healthcare administrative data sources. METHODS: Data were available for 12,432 and 13,714 women born in 1921–26 and 1946–51 from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). Diabetes was ascertained using the ALSWH survey, health service use, and cause of death data. Parsimonious multiple logistic regression analyses tested associations between sociodemographic and health variables and the presence of diabetes. RESULTS: In both cohorts, two or more of the sources captured more than 80% of the women with diabetes. The point prevalence of diabetes increased from 8.4% when the mean age of the women were aged 73, to 22.0% of surviving women at age 90 in the 1921–26 cohort; and from 2.6% at age 48 to 15.8% at age 68 in the 1946–51 cohort. In the 1921–26 cohort, women who were obese (OR: 3.56; 95 CI: 3.04–4.17) and women who were sedentary (OR: 1.18; 95 CI: 1.09–1.40) were more likely to have diabetes compared to those who had a normal weight and engaged in a moderate level of physical activity. In the 1946–51 cohort, the odds of diabetes increased three times (OR: 2.99; 95 CI: 2.54–3.52) for overweight women and nine times (OR: 8.78; 95 CI: 7.46–10.33) for obese women compared to those who had normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous use of multiple data sources improved the validity of diabetes case ascertainment. Application of this methodology in future studies may have important benefits including estimation of disease burden, health service needs, and resource allocation with improved precision. Diabetes prevalence increased with age, was much higher in the 1946–51 cohort than in 1921–26 at similar ages, and was significantly associated with physical inactivity and obesity. Interventions to promote physical activity and a healthy weight are needed to prevent the rising prevalence of diabetes across successive generations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7302694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73026942020-06-19 Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data Wubishet, Befikadu L. Harris, Melissa L. Forder, Peta M. Byles, Julie E. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to the absence and or costliness of biological measures such as glycated haemoglobin, diabetes case ascertainment and prevalence studies are usually conducted using surveys or routine health service use databases. However, the use of each of these sources is associated with its limitations potentially impacting the quality of the case ascertainment and prevalence estimation. This study aimed at ascertaining diabetes cases and estimating prevalence among mid- and older-age women through simultaneous use of a longitudinal survey and multiple healthcare administrative data sources. METHODS: Data were available for 12,432 and 13,714 women born in 1921–26 and 1946–51 from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health (ALSWH). Diabetes was ascertained using the ALSWH survey, health service use, and cause of death data. Parsimonious multiple logistic regression analyses tested associations between sociodemographic and health variables and the presence of diabetes. RESULTS: In both cohorts, two or more of the sources captured more than 80% of the women with diabetes. The point prevalence of diabetes increased from 8.4% when the mean age of the women were aged 73, to 22.0% of surviving women at age 90 in the 1921–26 cohort; and from 2.6% at age 48 to 15.8% at age 68 in the 1946–51 cohort. In the 1921–26 cohort, women who were obese (OR: 3.56; 95 CI: 3.04–4.17) and women who were sedentary (OR: 1.18; 95 CI: 1.09–1.40) were more likely to have diabetes compared to those who had a normal weight and engaged in a moderate level of physical activity. In the 1946–51 cohort, the odds of diabetes increased three times (OR: 2.99; 95 CI: 2.54–3.52) for overweight women and nine times (OR: 8.78; 95 CI: 7.46–10.33) for obese women compared to those who had normal weight. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous use of multiple data sources improved the validity of diabetes case ascertainment. Application of this methodology in future studies may have important benefits including estimation of disease burden, health service needs, and resource allocation with improved precision. Diabetes prevalence increased with age, was much higher in the 1946–51 cohort than in 1921–26 at similar ages, and was significantly associated with physical inactivity and obesity. Interventions to promote physical activity and a healthy weight are needed to prevent the rising prevalence of diabetes across successive generations. Public Library of Science 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7302694/ /pubmed/32555738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234812 Text en © 2020 Wubishet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wubishet, Befikadu L.
Harris, Melissa L.
Forder, Peta M.
Byles, Julie E.
Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title_full Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title_fullStr Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title_short Age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older Australian women: Case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
title_sort age and cohort rise in diabetes prevalence among older australian women: case ascertainment using survey and healthcare administrative data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7302694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234812
work_keys_str_mv AT wubishetbefikadul ageandcohortriseindiabetesprevalenceamongolderaustralianwomencaseascertainmentusingsurveyandhealthcareadministrativedata
AT harrismelissal ageandcohortriseindiabetesprevalenceamongolderaustralianwomencaseascertainmentusingsurveyandhealthcareadministrativedata
AT forderpetam ageandcohortriseindiabetesprevalenceamongolderaustralianwomencaseascertainmentusingsurveyandhealthcareadministrativedata
AT bylesjuliee ageandcohortriseindiabetesprevalenceamongolderaustralianwomencaseascertainmentusingsurveyandhealthcareadministrativedata