Cargando…

Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology

PURPOSE: With non-technical skills (NTS) deficits being recognised as a major cause for error in surgery, there is an increasing interest in their training and evaluation. A growing number of training courses are emerging and some NTS curricula have also been created. Many different training methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Cora, Aydın, Abdullatif, Brunckhorst, Oliver, Raison, Nicholas, Khan, Muhammad Shamim, Dasgupta, Prokar, Ahmed, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31529246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02920-6
_version_ 1783547966345183232
author Griffin, Cora
Aydın, Abdullatif
Brunckhorst, Oliver
Raison, Nicholas
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Dasgupta, Prokar
Ahmed, Kamran
author_facet Griffin, Cora
Aydın, Abdullatif
Brunckhorst, Oliver
Raison, Nicholas
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Dasgupta, Prokar
Ahmed, Kamran
author_sort Griffin, Cora
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: With non-technical skills (NTS) deficits being recognised as a major cause for error in surgery, there is an increasing interest in their training and evaluation. A growing number of training courses are emerging and some NTS curricula have also been created. Many different training methods are described in the literature but there is still uncertainty with regards to their optimum combination within a curriculum. METHODS: A literature review of the electronic database Medline was performed. All articles published before December 2018 were screened by abstract and included if deemed relevant by the author. The included articles’ reference lists were also screened for further relevant studies. RESULTS: Simulation training is accepted as the most effective way to train NTS. Within simulation training, it is shown that the ‘igloo’ full immersion/distributed simulation environment is appropriate for teaching NTS in urological scenarios where a designated operating room or space is not available. The use of multiple settings, for example wards and clinics as well as the operating room, is advantageous, as is training in an interprofessional team. Classroom teaching also plays a role in NTS training as an adjunct to simulation, with evidence that it improves some parameters of NTS. All levels, including qualified surgeons, benefit from NTS training; however, adaptation to both trainee level and specialty is important. Although less time consuming, training juniors and seniors together mainly benefits juniors, and training NTS at the same time as technical skills detracts from the quality of teaching. Debriefing is an important part of training and should be well structured; there are many debriefing models in existence, allowing for choice of method based on examiner preference and participant demographic. Furthermore, examiners should be well briefed in their task and trained in NTS assessment. CONCLUSION: To move forward, studies should combine tried and tested learning techniques into a curriculum covering all training levels, which should then be validated and followed up long term to ensure a positive impact on patient safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7303051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73030512020-06-22 Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology Griffin, Cora Aydın, Abdullatif Brunckhorst, Oliver Raison, Nicholas Khan, Muhammad Shamim Dasgupta, Prokar Ahmed, Kamran World J Urol Topic Paper PURPOSE: With non-technical skills (NTS) deficits being recognised as a major cause for error in surgery, there is an increasing interest in their training and evaluation. A growing number of training courses are emerging and some NTS curricula have also been created. Many different training methods are described in the literature but there is still uncertainty with regards to their optimum combination within a curriculum. METHODS: A literature review of the electronic database Medline was performed. All articles published before December 2018 were screened by abstract and included if deemed relevant by the author. The included articles’ reference lists were also screened for further relevant studies. RESULTS: Simulation training is accepted as the most effective way to train NTS. Within simulation training, it is shown that the ‘igloo’ full immersion/distributed simulation environment is appropriate for teaching NTS in urological scenarios where a designated operating room or space is not available. The use of multiple settings, for example wards and clinics as well as the operating room, is advantageous, as is training in an interprofessional team. Classroom teaching also plays a role in NTS training as an adjunct to simulation, with evidence that it improves some parameters of NTS. All levels, including qualified surgeons, benefit from NTS training; however, adaptation to both trainee level and specialty is important. Although less time consuming, training juniors and seniors together mainly benefits juniors, and training NTS at the same time as technical skills detracts from the quality of teaching. Debriefing is an important part of training and should be well structured; there are many debriefing models in existence, allowing for choice of method based on examiner preference and participant demographic. Furthermore, examiners should be well briefed in their task and trained in NTS assessment. CONCLUSION: To move forward, studies should combine tried and tested learning techniques into a curriculum covering all training levels, which should then be validated and followed up long term to ensure a positive impact on patient safety. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-17 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7303051/ /pubmed/31529246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02920-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Topic Paper
Griffin, Cora
Aydın, Abdullatif
Brunckhorst, Oliver
Raison, Nicholas
Khan, Muhammad Shamim
Dasgupta, Prokar
Ahmed, Kamran
Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title_full Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title_fullStr Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title_full_unstemmed Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title_short Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
title_sort non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology
topic Topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31529246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02920-6
work_keys_str_mv AT griffincora nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT aydınabdullatif nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT brunckhorstoliver nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT raisonnicholas nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT khanmuhammadshamim nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT dasguptaprokar nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology
AT ahmedkamran nontechnicalskillsareviewoftrainingandevaluationinurology