Cargando…
Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice
Acute intoxication with picrotoxin or the rodenticide tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) can cause seizures that rapidly progress to status epilepticus and death. Both compounds inhibit γ-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABA(A)) receptors with similar potency. However, TETS is approximately 100 × more...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02728-z |
_version_ | 1783547968057507840 |
---|---|
author | Pressly, Brandon Vasylieva, Natalia Barnych, Bogdan Singh, Vikrant Singh, Latika Bruun, Donald A. Hwang, Sung Hee Chen, Yi-Je Fettinger, James C. Johnnides, Stephanie Lein, Pamela J. Yang, Jun Hammock, Bruce D. Wulff, Heike |
author_facet | Pressly, Brandon Vasylieva, Natalia Barnych, Bogdan Singh, Vikrant Singh, Latika Bruun, Donald A. Hwang, Sung Hee Chen, Yi-Je Fettinger, James C. Johnnides, Stephanie Lein, Pamela J. Yang, Jun Hammock, Bruce D. Wulff, Heike |
author_sort | Pressly, Brandon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute intoxication with picrotoxin or the rodenticide tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) can cause seizures that rapidly progress to status epilepticus and death. Both compounds inhibit γ-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABA(A)) receptors with similar potency. However, TETS is approximately 100 × more lethal than picrotoxin. Here, we directly compared the toxicokinetics of the two compounds following intraperitoneal administration in mice. Using LC/MS analysis we found that picrotoxinin, the active component of picrotoxin, hydrolyses quickly into picrotoxic acid, has a short in vivo half-life, and is moderately brain penetrant (brain/plasma ratio 0.3). TETS, in contrast, is not metabolized by liver microsomes and persists in the body following intoxication. Using both GC/MS and a TETS-selective immunoassay we found that mice administered TETS at the LD(50) of 0.2 mg/kg in the presence of rescue medications exhibited serum levels that remained constant around 1.6 μM for 48 h before falling slowly over the next 10 days. TETS showed a similar persistence in tissues. Whole-cell patch-clamp demonstrated that brain and serum extracts prepared from mice at 2 and 14 days after TETS administration significantly blocked heterologously expressed α(2)β(3)γ(2) GABA(A)-receptors confirming that TETS remains pharmacodynamically active in vivo. This observed persistence may contribute to the long-lasting and recurrent seizures observed following human exposures. We suggest that countermeasures to neutralize TETS or accelerate its elimination should be explored for this highly dangerous threat agent. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00204-020-02728-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7303059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73030592020-06-22 Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice Pressly, Brandon Vasylieva, Natalia Barnych, Bogdan Singh, Vikrant Singh, Latika Bruun, Donald A. Hwang, Sung Hee Chen, Yi-Je Fettinger, James C. Johnnides, Stephanie Lein, Pamela J. Yang, Jun Hammock, Bruce D. Wulff, Heike Arch Toxicol Toxicokinetics and Metabolism Acute intoxication with picrotoxin or the rodenticide tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) can cause seizures that rapidly progress to status epilepticus and death. Both compounds inhibit γ-aminobutyric acid type-A (GABA(A)) receptors with similar potency. However, TETS is approximately 100 × more lethal than picrotoxin. Here, we directly compared the toxicokinetics of the two compounds following intraperitoneal administration in mice. Using LC/MS analysis we found that picrotoxinin, the active component of picrotoxin, hydrolyses quickly into picrotoxic acid, has a short in vivo half-life, and is moderately brain penetrant (brain/plasma ratio 0.3). TETS, in contrast, is not metabolized by liver microsomes and persists in the body following intoxication. Using both GC/MS and a TETS-selective immunoassay we found that mice administered TETS at the LD(50) of 0.2 mg/kg in the presence of rescue medications exhibited serum levels that remained constant around 1.6 μM for 48 h before falling slowly over the next 10 days. TETS showed a similar persistence in tissues. Whole-cell patch-clamp demonstrated that brain and serum extracts prepared from mice at 2 and 14 days after TETS administration significantly blocked heterologously expressed α(2)β(3)γ(2) GABA(A)-receptors confirming that TETS remains pharmacodynamically active in vivo. This observed persistence may contribute to the long-lasting and recurrent seizures observed following human exposures. We suggest that countermeasures to neutralize TETS or accelerate its elimination should be explored for this highly dangerous threat agent. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00204-020-02728-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-01 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7303059/ /pubmed/32239239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02728-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Toxicokinetics and Metabolism Pressly, Brandon Vasylieva, Natalia Barnych, Bogdan Singh, Vikrant Singh, Latika Bruun, Donald A. Hwang, Sung Hee Chen, Yi-Je Fettinger, James C. Johnnides, Stephanie Lein, Pamela J. Yang, Jun Hammock, Bruce D. Wulff, Heike Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title | Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title_full | Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title_short | Comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) in mice |
title_sort | comparison of the toxicokinetics of the convulsants picrotoxinin and tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (tets) in mice |
topic | Toxicokinetics and Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32239239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-020-02728-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT presslybrandon comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT vasylievanatalia comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT barnychbogdan comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT singhvikrant comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT singhlatika comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT bruundonalda comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT hwangsunghee comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT chenyije comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT fettingerjamesc comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT johnnidesstephanie comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT leinpamelaj comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT yangjun comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT hammockbruced comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice AT wulffheike comparisonofthetoxicokineticsoftheconvulsantspicrotoxininandtetramethylenedisulfotetraminetetsinmice |