Cargando…

Three-dimensional guidance including shape sensing of a stentgraft system for endovascular aneurysm repair

PURPOSE: During endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, medical instruments are guided with two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy and conventional digital subtraction angiography. However, this requires X-ray exposure and contrast agent is used, and the depth information is missing. To overcome t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jäckle, Sonja, García-Vázquez, Verónica, Eixmann, Tim, Matysiak, Florian, von Haxthausen, Felix, Sieren, Malte Maria, Schulz-Hildebrandt, Hinnerk, Hüttmann, Gereon, Ernst, Floris, Kleemann, Markus, Pätz, Torben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32383105
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02167-2
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: During endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) procedures, medical instruments are guided with two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy and conventional digital subtraction angiography. However, this requires X-ray exposure and contrast agent is used, and the depth information is missing. To overcome these drawbacks, a three-dimensional (3D) guidance approach based on tracking systems is introduced and evaluated. METHODS: A multicore fiber with fiber Bragg gratings for shape sensing and three electromagnetic (EM) sensors for locating the shape were integrated into a stentgraft system. A model for obtaining the located shape of the first 38 cm of the stentgraft system with two EM sensors is introduced and compared with a method based on three EM sensors. Both methods were evaluated with a vessel phantom containing a 3D-printed vessel made of silicone and agar-agar simulating the surrounding tissue. RESULTS: The evaluation of the guidance methods resulted in average errors from 1.35 to 2.43 mm and maximum errors from 3.04 to 6.30 mm using three EM sensors, and average errors from 1.57 to 2.64 mm and maximum errors from 2.79 to 6.27 mm using two EM sensors. Moreover, the videos made from the continuous measurements showed that a real-time guidance is possible with both approaches. CONCLUSION: The results showed that an accurate real-time guidance with two and three EM sensors is possible and that two EM sensors are already sufficient. Thus, the introduced 3D guidance method is promising to use it as navigation tool in EVAR procedures. Future work will focus on developing a method with less EM sensors and a detailed latency evaluation of the guidance method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11548-020-02167-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.