Cargando…
No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention wa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z |
_version_ | 1783547975178387456 |
---|---|
author | Damsma, Atser Taatgen, Niels de Jong, Ritske van Rijn, Hedderik |
author_facet | Damsma, Atser Taatgen, Niels de Jong, Ritske van Rijn, Hedderik |
author_sort | Damsma, Atser |
collection | PubMed |
description | Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention was biased towards the location and low-level visual features of shapes that appeared with a regular order but were irrelevant for the main search task. Here, we investigate whether this bias also holds for irrelevant metrical temporal regularities. In six experiments, participants were asked to perform search tasks. In Experiments 1a–d, sequences of squares, each presented at one of four locations, appeared in between the search trials. Crucially, in one location, the square appeared with a regular rhythm, whereas the timing in the other locations was random. In Experiments 2a and 2b, a sequence of centrally presented colored circles was shown in between the search trials, of which one specific color appeared regularly. We expected that, if attention is automatically biased towards these temporal regularities, reaction times would be faster if the target matches the location (Experiments 1a–d) or color (Experiments 2a–b) of the regular stimulus. However, no reaction time benefit was observed for these targets, suggesting that there was no attentional bias towards the regularity. In addition, we found no evidence for attentional entrainment to the rhythmic stimulus. These results suggest that people do not use implicit rhythmic temporal regularities to guide their attention in the same way as they use order regularities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7303091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73030912020-06-22 No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities Damsma, Atser Taatgen, Niels de Jong, Ritske van Rijn, Hedderik Atten Percept Psychophys Article Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention was biased towards the location and low-level visual features of shapes that appeared with a regular order but were irrelevant for the main search task. Here, we investigate whether this bias also holds for irrelevant metrical temporal regularities. In six experiments, participants were asked to perform search tasks. In Experiments 1a–d, sequences of squares, each presented at one of four locations, appeared in between the search trials. Crucially, in one location, the square appeared with a regular rhythm, whereas the timing in the other locations was random. In Experiments 2a and 2b, a sequence of centrally presented colored circles was shown in between the search trials, of which one specific color appeared regularly. We expected that, if attention is automatically biased towards these temporal regularities, reaction times would be faster if the target matches the location (Experiments 1a–d) or color (Experiments 2a–b) of the regular stimulus. However, no reaction time benefit was observed for these targets, suggesting that there was no attentional bias towards the regularity. In addition, we found no evidence for attentional entrainment to the rhythmic stimulus. These results suggest that people do not use implicit rhythmic temporal regularities to guide their attention in the same way as they use order regularities. Springer US 2019-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7303091/ /pubmed/31485992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Damsma, Atser Taatgen, Niels de Jong, Ritske van Rijn, Hedderik No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title | No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title_full | No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title_fullStr | No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title_full_unstemmed | No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title_short | No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
title_sort | no evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damsmaatser noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities AT taatgenniels noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities AT dejongritske noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities AT vanrijnhedderik noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities |