Cargando…

No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities

Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damsma, Atser, Taatgen, Niels, de Jong, Ritske, van Rijn, Hedderik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z
_version_ 1783547975178387456
author Damsma, Atser
Taatgen, Niels
de Jong, Ritske
van Rijn, Hedderik
author_facet Damsma, Atser
Taatgen, Niels
de Jong, Ritske
van Rijn, Hedderik
author_sort Damsma, Atser
collection PubMed
description Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention was biased towards the location and low-level visual features of shapes that appeared with a regular order but were irrelevant for the main search task. Here, we investigate whether this bias also holds for irrelevant metrical temporal regularities. In six experiments, participants were asked to perform search tasks. In Experiments 1a–d, sequences of squares, each presented at one of four locations, appeared in between the search trials. Crucially, in one location, the square appeared with a regular rhythm, whereas the timing in the other locations was random. In Experiments 2a and 2b, a sequence of centrally presented colored circles was shown in between the search trials, of which one specific color appeared regularly. We expected that, if attention is automatically biased towards these temporal regularities, reaction times would be faster if the target matches the location (Experiments 1a–d) or color (Experiments 2a–b) of the regular stimulus. However, no reaction time benefit was observed for these targets, suggesting that there was no attentional bias towards the regularity. In addition, we found no evidence for attentional entrainment to the rhythmic stimulus. These results suggest that people do not use implicit rhythmic temporal regularities to guide their attention in the same way as they use order regularities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7303091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73030912020-06-22 No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities Damsma, Atser Taatgen, Niels de Jong, Ritske van Rijn, Hedderik Atten Percept Psychophys Article Action and perception are optimized by exploiting temporal regularities, and it has been suggested that the attentional system prioritizes information that contains some form of structure. Indeed, Zhao, Al-Aidroos, and Turk-Browne (Psychological Science, 24(5), 667–677, 2013) found that attention was biased towards the location and low-level visual features of shapes that appeared with a regular order but were irrelevant for the main search task. Here, we investigate whether this bias also holds for irrelevant metrical temporal regularities. In six experiments, participants were asked to perform search tasks. In Experiments 1a–d, sequences of squares, each presented at one of four locations, appeared in between the search trials. Crucially, in one location, the square appeared with a regular rhythm, whereas the timing in the other locations was random. In Experiments 2a and 2b, a sequence of centrally presented colored circles was shown in between the search trials, of which one specific color appeared regularly. We expected that, if attention is automatically biased towards these temporal regularities, reaction times would be faster if the target matches the location (Experiments 1a–d) or color (Experiments 2a–b) of the regular stimulus. However, no reaction time benefit was observed for these targets, suggesting that there was no attentional bias towards the regularity. In addition, we found no evidence for attentional entrainment to the rhythmic stimulus. These results suggest that people do not use implicit rhythmic temporal regularities to guide their attention in the same way as they use order regularities. Springer US 2019-09-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7303091/ /pubmed/31485992 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Damsma, Atser
Taatgen, Niels
de Jong, Ritske
van Rijn, Hedderik
No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title_full No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title_fullStr No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title_full_unstemmed No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title_short No evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
title_sort no evidence for an attentional bias towards implicit temporal regularities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31485992
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01851-z
work_keys_str_mv AT damsmaatser noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities
AT taatgenniels noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities
AT dejongritske noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities
AT vanrijnhedderik noevidenceforanattentionalbiastowardsimplicittemporalregularities