Cargando…

Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review

A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranasinghe, Udara, Jefferies, Marcus, Davis, Peter, Pillay, Manikam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009
_version_ 1783548079754969088
author Ranasinghe, Udara
Jefferies, Marcus
Davis, Peter
Pillay, Manikam
author_facet Ranasinghe, Udara
Jefferies, Marcus
Davis, Peter
Pillay, Manikam
author_sort Ranasinghe, Udara
collection PubMed
description A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co–occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7303539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73035392020-06-25 Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review Ranasinghe, Udara Jefferies, Marcus Davis, Peter Pillay, Manikam Saf Health Work Review Article A safe work environment is crucial in high-risk industries, such as construction refurbishment. Safety incidents caused by uncertainty and unexpected events in construction refurbishment systems are difficult to control using conventional safety management techniques. Resilience engineering (RE) is proposed as an alternative to traditional safety management approaches. It presents a successful safety management methodology designed to deal with uncertainty in high-risk work environments. Despite the fact that RE resides in the safety domain, there is no common set of RE indicators to measure and assess resilient in the work environment. The main aim of this research is to explore RE indicators that have been identified as important in developing and assessing the resilient work environment in high-risk industries, particularly in construction refurbishment. Indicators have been attained through a systematic literature review of research and scholarly articles published between the years 2004 and 2019. The literature review explored RE indicators in various industries. Descriptive analysis and co–occurrence-based network visualization were used for data analysis. The findings revealed 28 RE indicators in 11 different high-risk industries. The results show that the four commonly used indicators were: top-management commitment, awareness, learning, and flexibility, all of which have a strong relationship with RE. The findings of this study are useful for stakeholders when making decisions concerning the most important RE indicators in the context of their research or practice as this would avoid the ambiguity and disparity in the identification of RE indicators. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2020-06 2020-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7303539/ /pubmed/32596006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Ranasinghe, Udara
Jefferies, Marcus
Davis, Peter
Pillay, Manikam
Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title_full Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title_short Resilience Engineering Indicators and Safety Management: A Systematic Review
title_sort resilience engineering indicators and safety management: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009
work_keys_str_mv AT ranasingheudara resilienceengineeringindicatorsandsafetymanagementasystematicreview
AT jefferiesmarcus resilienceengineeringindicatorsandsafetymanagementasystematicreview
AT davispeter resilienceengineeringindicatorsandsafetymanagementasystematicreview
AT pillaymanikam resilienceengineeringindicatorsandsafetymanagementasystematicreview